揭示双刃剑：分析二元的“投票列出”和“投票”的风险和机会

本文结合了最新的市场反馈，社区意见和相关分析，以深入研究列表和提取的投票机制中现有的主要问题

Recently, Binance launched the "Voting for Listing" and "Voting for Delisting" mechanisms, attempting to grant the community greater decision-making power and activate market vitality. However, this mechanism is like a double-edged sword, as it not only empowers the community but also harbors risks of manipulation and imbalance, testing the platform's wisdom in balancing democracy and efficiency.

最近，Binance启动了“投票”和“投票”和“投票”的机制，试图赋予社区更大的决策能力并激活市场活力。但是，这种机制就像一把双刃剑，因为它不仅赋予了社区能力，而且还避免了操纵和失衡的风险，还测试了平台在平衡民主和效率之间的智慧。

This article combines recent market feedback, community opinions, and relevant analyses to delve into the main issues existing in the voting mechanisms for listing and delisting, and discusses how to optimize the rules to make them fairer and more transparent.

本文结合了最新的市场反馈，社区意见和相关分析，以深入研究上市和提取的投票机制中存在的主要问题，并讨论了如何优化规则以使其更加公平，更透明。

According to Binance's current rules, the voting period lasts for 7 days, and users must hold at least 0.01 BNB to participate. Each user can cast a maximum of 5 votes, and each account can only vote once for the same project. However, this mechanism has sparked heated discussions in the community, with the main points of contention including the following aspects:

根据Binance的当前规则，投票期持续7天，用户必须至少持有0.01 BNB才能参加。每个用户最多可以投票5票，每个帐户只能投票一次。但是，这种机制引发了社区中激烈的讨论，主要争论重点包括以下方面：

1. Vote Manipulation and Cheating Rampant, Difficulty in Preventing Cheating Will Continue to Rise

1。投票操纵和作弊猖ramp，阻止作弊的困难将继续上升

Under the voting mechanism, project parties often spend money to manipulate votes in order to win listing opportunities, even hiring "voting armies" to create false appearances. Although the platform continuously optimizes anti-cheating measures, the difficulty of governance continues to rise with the evolution of vote manipulation techniques.

在投票机制下，项目政党经常花钱操纵投票，以赢得上市机会，甚至雇用“投票军队”来创造虚假的出现。尽管该平台不断地优化了反实际的措施，但随着投票操纵技术的发展，治理的困难仍在不断上升。

2. Community Division and Intensified Competition, Later Voting May Evolve into "PVP" Mode

2。社区部门和加强竞争，后来的投票可能演变为“ PVP”模式

Binance founder CZ mentioned that the initial voting mechanism in 2017 was effective, but later led to community division due to mutual attacks between project parties, forming a "PVP" situation.

Binance创始人CZ提到，2017年最初的投票机制是有效的，但后来由于项目各方之间的相互攻击而导致社区划分，形成了“ PVP”情况。

Some projects may incite users to maliciously disrupt other communities, turning the voting mechanism from a tool for fair competition into a battlefield that exacerbates market infighting.

一些项目可能会促使用户恶意破坏其他社区，从而将公平竞争工具的投票机制变成加剧市场内斗的战场。

3. Diminished Expected Economic Benefits

3。降低了预期的经济利益

The voting for listing model makes the process of new coin launches highly transparent, allowing everyone to predict which coins might win in advance and even track the progress in real-time. This high transparency somewhat diminishes the "surprise effect," reducing the novelty and economic value of token launches.

对上市模型的投票使新硬币的过程非常透明，使每个人都可以预测哪些硬币可能会提前获胜，甚至可以实时跟踪进度。这种高透明度在某种程度上减少了“惊喜效应”，从而降低了令牌发射的新颖性和经济价值。

4. Increased Risk of Bad Money Driving Out Good Money

4。增加不良钱的风险驱逐好钱

Due to the potential manipulation of voting results, truly capable projects with long-term value may not succeed in being listed, while projects with strong marketing capabilities and ample funds may find it easier to win. This mechanism could lead to a misallocation of market resources, exacerbating the risk of "bad money driving out good money."

由于潜在的投票结果操纵，具有长期价值的真正有能力的项目可能无法成功被列出，而具有强大营销能力和丰富资金的项目可能会发现更容易获胜。这种机制可能导致市场资源的分配，加剧了“赚钱赚钱”的风险。

Community Suggestions: Optimizing the Voting Mechanism Together

社区建议：一起优化投票机制

Community member @xiaoyibtc suggests that only token holders (with a minimum holding of 100 USD) should be allowed to vote to prevent malicious vote manipulation.

社区成员@xiaoyibtc建议，只有令牌持有人（最低持有100美元）才能投票以防止恶意投票操纵。

Community member @IZp3ddsqzk63818 proposes that only users holding the token for over 100 USD during the Alpha phase should be eligible to vote, promoting token market value growth and increasing trading volume and platform registration.

社区成员 @izp3ddsqzk63818建议，只有在Alpha阶段持有令牌超过100美元的用户才有资格投票，促进令牌市场价值增长，并增加交易量和平台注册。

Community member @Crypto_Cat888 suggests raising the voting account thresholds, such as account creation time, BNB holdings, and monthly trading volume. New users could be given a special voting opportunity, with subsequent votes following the rules.

社区成员 @crypto_cat888建议提高投票帐户门槛，例如帐户创建时间，BNB控股和每月交易量。可以为新用户提供一个特殊的投票机会，随后按照规则进行投票。

Community member @Jay_Cui1991 recommends that voting eligibility be based on the user's registration duration on Binance, historical trading volume, and BNB holdings. Additionally, users should hold the voting token and transfer a certain proportion to the Binance address, which they can withdraw after voting ends, to enhance the fairness and authenticity of the voting.

社区成员 @jay_cui1991建议投票资格基于用户对二人，历史交易量和BNB Holdings的注册持续时间。此外，用户应持有投票令牌并转移一定比例与二元地址的一定比例（他们可以在投票结束后撤回，以增强投票的公平性和真实性。

Community member @Lichao0418 proposes that voting users must hold the token and set a locking period, assigning different voting weights based on the duration of the lock. Voting could also be calculated based on the number of participants, market capitalization, and average locked amount. Only true holders can demonstrate long-term support for the community, while non-holders' voting weight defaults to 1 to ensure fairness and community consensus.

社区成员 @lichao0418建议投票用户必须持有令牌并设置锁定期，并根据锁定持续时间分配不同的投票权重。投票也可以根据参与者的数量，市值和平均锁定数量来计算。只有真正的持有人才能向社区表现出长期的支持，而非持有人的投票权重违约为1，以确保公平和社区共识。

Crypto KOL @gokunocool suggests allocating voting weights based on users' BNB holdings, using "capital" as a measurement standard to make voting results more quantifiable. Additionally, publicize the amount of BNB support each project receives, allowing BNB holders to participate in market competition. Project parties could attract more BNB holders' support, forming a more economically incentivized competitive model, which helps foster new gameplay.

Crypto KOL @GokunoCool建议根据用户的BNB持有量分配投票权重，以“资本”为衡量标准，以使投票结果更加量化。此外，宣传每个项目收到的BNB支持的数量，使BNB持有人能够参加市场竞争。项目派对可以吸引更多BNB持有人的支持，形成更经济激励的竞争模型，这有助于培养新的游戏玩法。

Community member @RedCap_io suggests implementing facial recognition identity verification for voting to prevent bulk registration of fake accounts, ensuring that even purchased accounts cannot bypass verification.

社区成员@redcap_io建议对投票实施面部识别身份验证，以防止伪造帐户的大量注册，以确保即使购买的帐户也无法绕过验证。

Community member @tianyisee proposes combining statistics and social choice theory, considering factors such as the number of tokens held, BNB holdings, and platform joining time. The following rules are suggested:

社区成员@tianyisee提议将统计数据和社会选择理论结合起来，考虑诸如持有的代币数量，BNB Holdings和平台加入时间之类的因素。建议以下规则：

- Total voting rights are: 1 (basic) + BNB weighted votes + registration duration weighted votes.

- 总投票权为：1（基本） + BNB加权投票 +注册持续时间加权投票。

- Additionally, candidate projects must receive over 50% of the voting rights to advance to the next stage.

- 此外，候选项目必须获得超过50％的投票权才能晋升到下一阶段。

Crypto KOL @blockTVBee

加密kol @blocktvbee