由趋势跟踪器于2025年3月5日|市场见解

在当今动荡的加密景观中，寻找真正的宝藏需要敏锐的价值和实用性。 Bitlemons（$ blem）已成为宝石

In the turbulent sea of crypto, finding true treasure requires a keen eye for value and utility. As Chainlink (LINK) and Polkadot (DOT) encountered choppy waters, BitLemons (BLEM) emerged as the gem that seasoned investors were eager to claim.

在湍流的加密海洋中，寻找真正的宝藏需要敏锐的价值和实用性。随着Chainlink（Link）和Polkadot（DOT）遇到了波涛汹涌的水域，Bitlemons（Blem）成为经验丰富的投资者渴望声称的宝石。

With its innovative GambleFi platform generating consistent revenue, BitLemons quickly drew attention, especially as Stage 2 of the presale saw tremendous momentum at double the initial price.

凭借其创新的GambleFI平台产生了一致的收入，Bitlemons很快引起了人们的关注，尤其是当Presale的第2阶段的势头巨大的势头以初始价格的两倍。

However, with exchange listings rapidly approaching and rumors circulating about 17-18 cents, early investors stood to realize potential returns exceeding 1700%.

但是，随着交流清单的迅速临近，谣言散发了约17-18美分，早期投资者就可以实现超过1700％的潜在回报。

Can Chainlink Navigate Back To Calmer Waters With Its Latest Upgrade?

Chainlink可以通过其最新升级来导航回到平静的水域吗？

Chainlink recently launched its Cross-Chain Interoperability Protocol (CCIP) v1.5, introducing a new Cross-Chain Token standard aimed at simplifying multi-blockchain deployments.

ChainLink最近启动了其跨链互操作性协议（CCIP）v1.5，引入了一种新的跨链令牌标准，旨在简化多块链部署。

Despite this technical advancement, LINK struggled to maintain momentum. The token declined 8.75% over the past week, dropping to $13.82 with decreased trading volume of $830.34M (down 6.91%).

尽管有这种技术进步，但林克仍在努力保持动力。在过去一周中，令牌下跌8.75％，下降到13.82美元，交易量下降了83034万美元（下跌6.91％）。

LINK faced significant resistance at $15, which it failed to breach despite multiple attempts. This indicated that buyers exhausted themselves at this level.

Link面临着15美元的明显阻力，尽管进行了多次尝试，但仍未违反。这表明买家在这个水平上精疲力尽。

Furthermore, LINK encountered strong support at $11, which it managed to defend. Nevertheless, the lower price levels encountered weaker support, suggesting that buyers might not be able to provide sufficient support at deeper levels.

此外，Link遇到了11美元的强大支持，并设法捍卫了这一点。然而，较低的价格水平遇到了较弱的支持，这表明买家可能无法在更深层次的水平上提供足够的支持。

In the short term, LINK showed signs of potential recovery as it broke out of the downward channel in which it had been moving over the past month.

在短期内，链接显示出了过去一个月移动的向下渠道时的潜在恢复迹象。

However, despite this positive development, LINK still had a long way to go to reach the crucial $15 resistance level.

但是，尽管有这种积极的发展，但Link仍然有很长的路要达到至关重要的15美元阻力水平。

Moreover, while the large PEUMVs (greater than 100 BTC) demonstrated some interest, their activity remained minimal.

此外，尽管大型PEUMV（大于100 BTC）表现出一定的兴趣，但它们的活性仍然很少。

On the other hand, the activity of medium-sized PEUMVs (30-100 BTC) showed a slight decrease, indicating that these entities were not actively accumulating LINK at lower prices.

另一方面，中型PEUMV（30-100 BTC）的活动显示出略有下降，表明这些实体并未以较低的价格积极积累链接。

This lack of interest from medium-sized PEUMVs could be attributed to their belief that LINK would continue to move lower, or perhaps they had already completed their desired accumulations at higher price levels.

中型PEUMV缺乏兴趣可能归因于他们的信念，即链接将继续下降，或者他们已经以更高的价格水平完成了所需的积累。

In the short term, the prospects of LINK remained bleak.

在短期内，链接的前景仍然黯淡。

Can Polkadot’s ETF Filing Be Enough To Locate New Gains?

Polkadot的ETF申请是否足以找到新的收益？

Polkadot recently made headlines with Tuttle Capital Management filing for the first-ever leveraged ETFs tied to DOT.

Polkadot最近以Tuttle Capital Management申请了与DOT相关的第一个杠杆ETF的头条新闻。

While this institutional interest signaled confidence in Polkadot’s technology, it didn’t translate to positive price action. DOT declined by 3.61% over the past week, trading at $4.24 with its market cap shrinking by 16.58% to $6.59B.

尽管这种机构兴趣表明对Polkadot的技术有信心，但并没有转化为正价行动。在过去一周中，DOT下降了3.61％，其市值缩小了16.58％，至6.59B美元，其市值下降了4.24美元。

Trading volume also decreased by 3.61% to $370.47M.

交易量也下降了3.61％，至3.7047亿美元。

Technical analysis revealed that DOT struggled to maintain support at $4.40, which it finally broke after multiple attempts.

技术分析表明，DOT努力将支持保持在4.40美元，这是多次尝试后最终破裂的。

The important $5.00 resistance level repeatedly rejected breakthrough attempts, further complicating the price movements.

重要的$ 5.00电阻水平反复拒绝突破性尝试，从而使价格变动变得更加复杂。

Despite the recent price decrease, the Relative Strength Index (RSI) indicated that the oversold conditions were improving.

尽管最近的价格下降，但相对强度指数（RSI）表明，超售条件正在改善。

This signaled that the selling pressure might be decreasing, potentially setting the stage for a price rebound.

这表明销售压力可能正在下降，有可能为价格反弹奠定舞台。

However, the window of opportunity for investors to capitalize on BitLemons (BLEM) was rapidly closing.

但是，投资者利用Bitlemons（Blem）的机会之窗正在迅速关闭。

As the cryptocurrency market navigated choppy waters, presenting most projects with bleak prospects, BitLemons stood out as a beacon of hope, especially for treasure hunters seeking a valuable gem amidst an ocean of uncertainty.

当加密货币市场在波涛汹涌的水域中航行，向大多数项目呈现出惨淡的前景，比特林斯（Bitlemons）脱颖而出，是希望的灯塔，尤其是对于寻宝者而言，在不确定性的海洋中寻求宝贵的宝石。

While established cryptocurrencies like Chainlink (LINK) and Polkadot (DOT) encountered turbulent times, BitLemons was quickly grabbing attention with its innovative GambleFi crypto gaming platform.

尽管诸如Chainlink（Link）和Polkadot（DOT）之类的既定加密货币遇到了动荡的时代，但Bitlemons迅速通过其创新的Gamblefi Crypto游戏平台引起了人们的关注。

This platform, featuring over 8,000 games from industry leaders like Evolution and Pragmatic, operated 24/7, ensuring consistent returns regardless of market conditions.

该平台拥有来自Evolution和Opmatic等行业领导者的8,000多种游戏，并运行了24/7，可确保不管市场状况如何。

This unique model, in conjunction with dual security audits from SpyWolf and SolidProof – validation that its competitors simply couldn’t match – made BitLemons' tokenomics a treasure trove in itself.

这种独特的模型与Spywolf和Sueldproof的双重安全审核（其竞争对手根本无法匹配），使Bitlemons的Tokenomics本身成为宝库。

With 30% of Gross Gaming Revenue directly supporting the ecosystem – 15% funding token buybacks and burns, creating deflationary pressure, while 15% rewarded stakers with passive income – BitLemons was truly optimized for success.

有30％的总游戏收入直接支持生态系统 - 15％的资金代币回购和燃烧，造成了放气压力，而15％的人奖励了具有被动收入的Stakers -Bitlemons真正优化了成功。

This was in stark contrast to projects like Chainlink, which had limited functionality and faced technical difficulties despite its technical advancements.

这与诸如ChainLink之类的项目形成鲜明对比，ChainLink的功能有限，尽管具有技术进步，却面临着技术困难。

Polkadot, on the other hand, drew attention with Tuttle Capital Management’s filing for the first-ever leveraged ETFs tied to DOT, showcasing increased interest from institutional investors.

另一方面，Polkadot引起了Tuttle Capital Management对DOT绑定的第一个杠杆ETF的申请，这表明了机构投资者的兴趣增加。

However, this good news wasn’t enough to keep the price of DOT in the green as it floundered despite the filings and

但是，这个好消息不足以使DOT的价格保持在绿色状态，尽管提交和