由趨勢跟踪器於2025年3月5日|市場見解

在當今動蕩的加密景觀中，尋找真正的寶藏需要敏銳的價值和實用性。 Bitlemons（$ blem）已成為寶石

In the turbulent sea of crypto, finding true treasure requires a keen eye for value and utility. As Chainlink (LINK) and Polkadot (DOT) encountered choppy waters, BitLemons (BLEM) emerged as the gem that seasoned investors were eager to claim.

在湍流的加密海洋中，尋找真正的寶藏需要敏銳的價值和實用性。隨著Chainlink（Link）和Polkadot（DOT）遇到了波濤洶湧的水域，Bitlemons（Blem）成為經驗豐富的投資者渴望聲稱的寶石。

With its innovative GambleFi platform generating consistent revenue, BitLemons quickly drew attention, especially as Stage 2 of the presale saw tremendous momentum at double the initial price.

憑藉其創新的GambleFI平台產生了一致的收入，Bitlemons很快引起了人們的關注，尤其是當Presale的第2階段的勢頭巨大的勢頭以初始價格的兩倍。

However, with exchange listings rapidly approaching and rumors circulating about 17-18 cents, early investors stood to realize potential returns exceeding 1700%.

但是，隨著交流清單的迅速臨近，謠言散發了約17-18美分，早期投資者就可以實現超過1700％的潛在回報。

Can Chainlink Navigate Back To Calmer Waters With Its Latest Upgrade?

Chainlink可以通過其最新升級來導航回到平靜的水域嗎？

Chainlink recently launched its Cross-Chain Interoperability Protocol (CCIP) v1.5, introducing a new Cross-Chain Token standard aimed at simplifying multi-blockchain deployments.

ChainLink最近啟動了其跨鏈互操作性協議（CCIP）v1.5，引入了一種新的跨鏈令牌標準，旨在簡化多塊鏈部署。

Despite this technical advancement, LINK struggled to maintain momentum. The token declined 8.75% over the past week, dropping to $13.82 with decreased trading volume of $830.34M (down 6.91%).

儘管有這種技術進步，但林克仍在努力保持動力。在過去一周中，令牌下跌8.75％，下降到13.82美元，交易量下降了83034萬美元（下跌6.91％）。

LINK faced significant resistance at $15, which it failed to breach despite multiple attempts. This indicated that buyers exhausted themselves at this level.

Link面臨著15美元的明顯阻力，儘管進行了多次嘗試，但仍未違反。這表明買家在這個水平上精疲力盡。

Furthermore, LINK encountered strong support at $11, which it managed to defend. Nevertheless, the lower price levels encountered weaker support, suggesting that buyers might not be able to provide sufficient support at deeper levels.

此外，Link遇到了11美元的強大支持，並設法捍衛了這一點。然而，較低的價格水平遇到了較弱的支持，這表明買家可能無法在更深層次的水平上提供足夠的支持。

In the short term, LINK showed signs of potential recovery as it broke out of the downward channel in which it had been moving over the past month.

在短期內，鏈接顯示出了過去一個月移動的向下渠道時的潛在恢復跡象。

However, despite this positive development, LINK still had a long way to go to reach the crucial $15 resistance level.

但是，儘管有這種積極的發展，但Link仍然有很長的路要達到至關重要的15美元阻力水平。

Moreover, while the large PEUMVs (greater than 100 BTC) demonstrated some interest, their activity remained minimal.

此外，儘管大型PEUMV（大於100 BTC）表現出一定的興趣，但它們的活性仍然很少。

On the other hand, the activity of medium-sized PEUMVs (30-100 BTC) showed a slight decrease, indicating that these entities were not actively accumulating LINK at lower prices.

另一方面，中型PEUMV（30-100 BTC）的活動顯示出略有下降，表明這些實體並未以較低的價格積極積累鏈接。

This lack of interest from medium-sized PEUMVs could be attributed to their belief that LINK would continue to move lower, or perhaps they had already completed their desired accumulations at higher price levels.

中型PEUMV缺乏興趣可能歸因於他們的信念，即鏈接將繼續下降，或者他們已經以更高的價格水平完成了所需的積累。

In the short term, the prospects of LINK remained bleak.

在短期內，鏈接的前景仍然黯淡。

Can Polkadot’s ETF Filing Be Enough To Locate New Gains?

Polkadot的ETF申請是否足以找到新的收益？

Polkadot recently made headlines with Tuttle Capital Management filing for the first-ever leveraged ETFs tied to DOT.

Polkadot最近以Tuttle Capital Management申請了與DOT相關的第一個槓桿ETF的頭條新聞。

While this institutional interest signaled confidence in Polkadot’s technology, it didn’t translate to positive price action. DOT declined by 3.61% over the past week, trading at $4.24 with its market cap shrinking by 16.58% to $6.59B.

儘管這種機構興趣表明對Polkadot的技術有信心，但並沒有轉化為正價行動。在過去一周中，DOT下降了3.61％，其市值縮小了16.58％，至6.59B美元，其市值下降了4.24美元。

Trading volume also decreased by 3.61% to $370.47M.

交易量也下降了3.61％，至3.7047億美元。

Technical analysis revealed that DOT struggled to maintain support at $4.40, which it finally broke after multiple attempts.

技術分析表明，DOT努力將支持保持在4.40美元，這是多次嘗試後最終破裂的。

The important $5.00 resistance level repeatedly rejected breakthrough attempts, further complicating the price movements.

重要的$ 5.00電阻水平反复拒絕突破性嘗試，從而使價格變動變得更加複雜。

Despite the recent price decrease, the Relative Strength Index (RSI) indicated that the oversold conditions were improving.

儘管最近的價格下降，但相對強度指數（RSI）表明，超售條件正在改善。

This signaled that the selling pressure might be decreasing, potentially setting the stage for a price rebound.

這表明銷售壓力可能正在下降，有可能為價格反彈奠定舞台。

However, the window of opportunity for investors to capitalize on BitLemons (BLEM) was rapidly closing.

但是，投資者利用Bitlemons（Blem）的機會之窗正在迅速關閉。

As the cryptocurrency market navigated choppy waters, presenting most projects with bleak prospects, BitLemons stood out as a beacon of hope, especially for treasure hunters seeking a valuable gem amidst an ocean of uncertainty.

當加密貨幣市場在波濤洶湧的水域中航行，向大多數項目呈現出慘淡的前景，比特林斯（Bitlemons）脫穎而出，是希望的燈塔，尤其是對於尋寶者而言，在不確定性的海洋中尋求寶貴的寶石。

While established cryptocurrencies like Chainlink (LINK) and Polkadot (DOT) encountered turbulent times, BitLemons was quickly grabbing attention with its innovative GambleFi crypto gaming platform.

儘管諸如Chainlink（Link）和Polkadot（DOT）之類的既定加密貨幣遇到了動蕩的時代，但Bitlemons迅速通過其創新的Gamblefi Crypto遊戲平台引起了人們的關注。

This platform, featuring over 8,000 games from industry leaders like Evolution and Pragmatic, operated 24/7, ensuring consistent returns regardless of market conditions.

該平台擁有來自Evolution和Opmatic等行業領導者的8,000多種遊戲，並運行了24/7，可確保不管市場狀況如何。

This unique model, in conjunction with dual security audits from SpyWolf and SolidProof – validation that its competitors simply couldn’t match – made BitLemons' tokenomics a treasure trove in itself.

這種獨特的模型與Spywolf和Sueldproof的雙重安全審核（其競爭對手根本無法匹配），使Bitlemons的Tokenomics本身成為寶庫。

With 30% of Gross Gaming Revenue directly supporting the ecosystem – 15% funding token buybacks and burns, creating deflationary pressure, while 15% rewarded stakers with passive income – BitLemons was truly optimized for success.

有30％的總遊戲收入直接支持生態系統 - 15％的資金代幣回購和燃燒，造成了放氣壓力，而15％的人獎勵了具有被動收入的Stakers -Bitlemons真正優化了成功。

This was in stark contrast to projects like Chainlink, which had limited functionality and faced technical difficulties despite its technical advancements.

這與諸如ChainLink之類的項目形成鮮明對比，ChainLink的功能有限，儘管具有技術進步，卻面臨著技術困難。

Polkadot, on the other hand, drew attention with Tuttle Capital Management’s filing for the first-ever leveraged ETFs tied to DOT, showcasing increased interest from institutional investors.

另一方面，Polkadot引起了Tuttle Capital Management對DOT綁定的第一個槓桿ETF的申請，這表明了機構投資者的興趣增加。

However, this good news wasn’t enough to keep the price of DOT in the green as it floundered despite the filings and

但是，這個好消息不足以使DOT的價格保持在綠色狀態，儘管提交和