标题：crypto.com刚刚拉起了加密历史上最勇敢的治理操纵特技

让我们面对现实吧 - DAO治理对代币持有者来说是个玩笑，但对于希望在同时扮演权力下放的项目中保持控制的项目非常适合。

In the rapidly evolving landscape of blockchain technology, Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) have emerged as a promising paradigm for collective decision-making and governance. However, despite the potential of DAOs to empower token holders and foster community engagement, there is growing concern that many projects are exploiting the concept of DAO governance for their own purposes, leaving token holders with little to no real influence.

在区块链技术的快速发展的景观中，分散的自治组织（DAOS）已成为集体决策和治理的有前途的范式。然而，尽管Daos有潜力赋予令牌持有人并促进社区参与的能力，但人们越来越担心许多项目正在为自己的目的利用DAO治理的概念，而将令牌持有人几乎没有影响。

One glaring instance of this deception comes from the Crypto.com ecosystem, which has become notorious for its blatant manipulation of DAO proposals and its disregard for the interests of token holders.

这种欺骗的一个明显的例子来自Crypto.com生态系统，该系统因其公然对DAO建议的操纵而臭名昭著，并且由于代币持有人的利益而无视它。

Crypto.com, the company behind the CRO token and the Crypto.com Exchange, has been a major player in the cryptocurrency industry for several years. The company began its journey as a cryptocurrency platform, but it has since diversified into other areas, such as DeFi and NFTs.

Cropto.com是Cro Token和Crypto.com交易所背后的公司，已经在加密货币行业一直是一名主要参与者。该公司以加密货币平台的身份开始了自己的旅程，但此后已将其分散到其他领域，例如Defi和NFTS。

Despite its efforts to present itself as a decentralized entity, Crypto.com has faced criticism for maintaining tight control over its projects and prioritizing its own agenda over the preferences of the community.

尽管它努力将自己作为一个分散的实体展示，但Crypto.com仍面临批评，以维持其项目的严格控制，并优先考虑其自己的议程而不是社区的偏好。

Earlier this month, Cronos chain pushed through a proposal to "re-mint" 70 billion CRO tokens. These aren't new tokens - they're the exact 70% of supply that Crypto.com dramatically "burned" in February 2021 right before their mainnet launch.

本月初，Cronos Chain推进了“重新磨合” 700亿个CRO令牌的提议。这些不是新的代币 - 它们是Crypto.com的确切70％的供应量，该供应量在2021年2月在主网发布之前就显着“燃烧”。

Back then, they marketed it as the "largest token burn in history" to "fully decentralize the network" (convenient how that blog post is now deleted). The burn did output a short-term buzz, but ultimately, it was an attempt to quickly convert DeFi summer hype into usable value.

那时，他们将其销售为“历史上最大的代币燃烧”，以“完全分散网络”（现在如何删除该博客文章）。燃烧确实引起了短期嗡嗡声，但最终，这是试图将Defi Summer Hype快速转化为可用值的尝试。

After the dust settled and the hype died down, Cronos chain applied for a new proposal to bring back the 70 billion CRO tokens, boasting about how quickly they got the proposal through.

尘埃落定和炒作消失后，克罗诺斯连锁店申请了一项新提案，以带回700亿个Cro cro tokens，吹嘘他们得到了该提议的速度。

The proposal went through smoothly with an overwhelming majority vote. A total of 1,675 out of 1,761 voted in favor of re-minting the tokens, while only 86 voted against it.

该提案以绝大多数投票顺利进行。在1,761人中，共有1,675票投票支持重新制造令牌，而只有86个投票赞成它。

This isn't surprising considering the vast majority of the voting power was concentrated in a few large entities, known as "validators." Out of the 100 validators, only 16 voted against the proposal, while the remaining 84 voted in favor of it.

考虑到绝大多数投票权集中在一些被称为“验证者”的大型实体上，这并不奇怪。在100个验证者中，只有16个投票反对该提案，而其余的84则投票赞成该提案。

The small number of validators who voted against the proposal weren't necessarily against the proposal itself, but rather felt pressured to vote no due to the feedback they received from the community.

投票反对该提案的少数验证者不一定反对该提案本身，而是由于他们从社区收到的反馈而感到压力不得投票。

Many members of the CRO community expressed their disappointment with the proposal and pointed out that it appeared to be designed to benefit Crypto.com at the expense of token holders.

CRO社区的许多成员对该提案表示失望，并指出它的设计似乎是为了使Crypto.com受益，而牺牲了令牌持有人。

Some community members also noted that the proposal was pushed through too quickly, with insufficient time for discussion and feedback.

一些社区成员还指出，该提案的推动太快了，没有足够的时间进行讨论和反馈。

Despite the concerns raised by the community, the proposal ultimately passed with an overwhelming majority vote, demonstrating the significant influence that a small number of validators can have over DAO governance.

尽管社区引起了人们的担忧，但该提案最终以绝大多数投票通过，这表明了少数验证者对DAO治理的重大影响。

As industry giants manipulate governance this blatantly, it poisons the well for everyone. It reinforces the worst stereotypes about crypto, undermines projects genuinely trying to share value with token holders, and shows retail exactly where they stand in the hierarchy: dead last, by design.output: Let’s face it – DAO governance is a joke for token holders but works perfectly for projects looking to maintain control while cosplaying decentralization.

当行业巨头公然操纵治理时，这对每个人都很好。它加强了关于加密货币的最糟糕的刻板印象，破坏了真正试图与令牌持有人共享价值的项目，并准确地显示了它们在层次结构中的位置：Dead last，by Design.output：Output：Out's Faceput。

I don’t usually pay attention to CRO or the Crypto.com ecosystem (not sure many crypto natives really do), but they just pulled something so brazen it caught my attention and I think it deserves yours too. This isn’t some obscure DeFi project run by anons – this is a company with Super Bowl commercials, arena naming rights, and a seat at regulatory roundtables.

我通常不关注CRO或Crypto.com生态系统（不确定许多加密本地人确实会这样做），但是他们只是拉了一些东西，因此引起了我的注意，我认为这也值得您。这不是Anons开展的一些晦涩的Defi项目 - 这是一家拥有超级碗广告，竞技场命名权和监管圆桌会议的公司。

When industry giants manipulate governance this blatantly, it poisons the well for everyone. It reinforces the worst stereotypes about crypto, undermines projects genuinely trying to share value with token holders, and shows retail exactly where they stand in the hierarchy: dead last, by design.

当行业巨头公然操纵治理时，它对每个人都很好。它加强了关于加密货币的最糟糕的刻板印象，破坏了真正试图与令牌持有人共享价值的项目，并准确地显示了它们在层次结构中的位置：最后一个设计。

Earlier this month, Cronos chain pushed through a proposal to “re-mint” 70 billion CRO tokens. These aren’t new tokens – they’re the exact 70% of supply that Crypto.com dramatically “burned” in February 2021 right before their mainnet launch.

本月初，Cronos Chain推进了一个“重新磨合” 700亿CRO令牌的提议。这些不是新令牌 - 它们是Crypto.com的确切70％的供应量，该供应量在2021年2月在主网发布之前就显着“燃烧”。

Back then, they marketed it as the “largest token burn in history” to “fully decentralize the network” (convenient how that blog post is now deleted). The burn did output a short-term buzz, but ultimately, it was an attempt to quickly convert DeFi summer hype into usable value. After the dust settled and the hype died down, Cronos chain applied for a new proposal to bring back the 70 billion CRO tokens, boasting about how quickly they got the proposal through.

那时，他们将其销售为“历史上最大的代币燃烧”，以“完全分散网络”（即将删除该博客文章的方便）。燃烧确实引起了短期嗡嗡声，但最终，这是试图将Defi Summer Hype快速转化为可用值的尝试。尘埃落定和炒作消失后，克罗诺斯连锁店申请了一项新提案，以带回700亿个Cro cro tokens，吹嘘他们得到了该提议的速度。

The proposal went through smoothly with an overwhelming majority vote. A total of 1,675 out of 1,761 voted in favor of re-minting the tokens

该提案以绝大多数投票顺利进行。在1,761人中，共有1,675票投票支持重新制造令牌