![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Recently, a new batch of MEME tokens have emerged in the on-chain trading field, quickly becoming a hot topic. In just a month, new subdivisions have appeared in the AI Agent field, from ai16z to Virtual and then to Swarms. As various AI Agent tokens continue to emerge, which ones will break through the competition, and which are just fleeting concepts? There may be multiple angles to consider, but the flow of funds on-chain and changes in major players may still be the most important indicators.
PANews takes the recently popular Swarms token as the main object of analysis, comparing it with six high-market-cap AI Agent tokens' major addresses, attempting to "carve a boat to seek a sword" once again, to glimpse some secrets. The data range for this analysis includes: the initial purchase and sale conditions of the top 1000 holding addresses of Swarms tokens (data time cut off at January 6, 2025, 24:00), and the address overlap situation of six AI-related tokens with a market cap exceeding 100 million USD, including Fartcoin, GRIFFAIN, ZEREBRO, ai16z, arc, and Swarms (data time cut off at January 7, 2025, 14:00), as well as analysis of internal trading records.
Some quietly lay the groundwork at low prices, while others follow the trend to enter
First, looking at the timeline of when major players entered the market, most of them started entering after January 2, which was 12 days after the token was created. From a timing perspective, many major players in Swarms began buying only after the Swarms ecosystem started to heat up, failing to complete early positioning.
However, from the price curve of Swarms, if purchased before December 27, the price could basically be maintained below 0.02 USD, with nearly a 30-fold increase from the current highest price of 0.6 USD. Analyzing the initial purchase prices of these addresses, 202 addresses bought in the price range of 0.01 to 0.05 USD, while the highest number of addresses bought in the range of 0.3 to 0.4 USD.
The distribution of these two data points means that early investors in Swarms bought in batches at low prices during the period of price collapse, and this buying was relatively dispersed, not concentrated in a single time period. The benefit of this is that they could acquire chips at a lower price. Another group of major players began to enter significantly after the discussion around Swarms heated up, but their holding prices do not have much competitive advantage.
This distribution of chips may explain why the Swarms market appears to have significant short-term fluctuations. If early ambushers sell at high points, new major players have higher costs, and once a large sell-off occurs, it is easier to trigger sensitive nerves on both sides, leading to a sharp drop.
However, looking at the chip distribution, the main chips of Swarms are relatively dispersed. In the analysis of the top 1000 holding addresses, there are not many tokens sourced from the same address, and most addresses' initial token sources are mainly from on-chain exchanges. Therefore, there is little evidence of early major players acquiring large amounts of chips and then dispersing them to multiple addresses.
Additionally, by comparing internal trading addresses, it was found that addresses that purchased on the internal market did not appear among the current top 1000 holding addresses. Therefore, the early chips of this token have basically completed their rotation.
From the overall data, the average initial purchase price of Swarms tokens is 0.17 USD, and the average initial selling price is 0.23 USD, with the average initial purchase amount per address reaching 37,600 USD and the average initial selling amount about 28,200 USD. Comparing the buying and selling situation of individual addresses, the average initial selling price of these addresses is about 2.43 times the buying price.
The highest major holder has made 25 million USD profit without selling
Compared to other MEME tokens, the average initial purchase amount mentioned above is significantly higher, mainly due to the influence of some major addresses. The address with the highest initial transfer amount is Dsjzh2oj3HxyPefjQr5qqvbR5NrMnvBgptGLSQ3t8T5i, which transferred about 4.13 million USD from another address on December 31, followed by several transfers totaling about 500,000 USD, with the current holding value at 27.33 million USD.
The address it transferred from, 5HfrnyodRraAw63aRVPueD5Er4D
免责声明:info@kdj.com
所提供的信息并非交易建议。根据本文提供的信息进行的任何投资,kdj.com不承担任何责任。加密货币具有高波动性,强烈建议您深入研究后,谨慎投资!
如您认为本网站上使用的内容侵犯了您的版权,请立即联系我们(info@kdj.com),我们将及时删除。
-
- 在特朗普的关税公告之前,比特币(BTC)稳步
- 2025-04-02 18:00:12
- Investing.com-比特币(BTC)在周三稳定地看到,由于交易者在很大程度上是避开风险的,几乎没有购买
-
- Solana(Sol)价格仍然陷入困境,这暗示着公牛保持被动的交易活动下降
- 2025-04-02 18:00:12
- 在交易者预见到朝新鲜底部迈向新鲜底部的时代,隐藏的看涨差异闪烁着将上涨升至150美元的可能性
-
-
-
- 比特币(BTC)关闭了2025年3月的每月蜡烛,就在38.2%的斐波那契回回层
- 2025-04-02 17:50:12
- 尽管开始了这一年,但BTC在2025年第一季度以足够的音调结束,增强了其看涨的前景。
-
- 两个主要的狗果会抗性水平可能铺平了下一次公牛奔跑的道路
- 2025-04-02 17:50:12
- 一位分析师指出了两个主要的狗狗毒素阻力水平,这可能会为下一个牛市的价格铺平道路。
-
-
- 解锁未来:VRC-20代币如何重新定义数据所有权和货币化
- 2025-04-02 17:45:12
- VRC-20代币标准是区块链技术领域的开发开发,旨在使用户能够将其作为宝贵资产的代币化和交易数据。
-