Sui vs Aptos：哪个将主导下一代区块链时代？

我们将SUI和APTO在区块链绩效，可伸缩性，生态系统和交易优势方面进行了比较，并预测，到2025年底，SUI的价格将达到16美元，APT将达到22美元。

Author: Patrick Bush, VanEck

作者：帕特里克·布什（Patrick Bush），瓦内克（Vaneck）

Compiled by: Alex Liu, Foresight News

编译者：Alex Liu，预科新闻

We compared Sui and Aptos in terms of blockchain performance, scalability, ecosystem, and transaction advantages, and predicted that by the end of 2025, the price of SUI will reach $16, and APT will reach $22.

我们将SUI和APTO在区块链绩效，可伸缩性，生态系统和交易优势方面进行了比较，并预测，到2025年底，SUI的价格将达到16美元，APT将达到22美元。

Please note that VanEck holds Sui (SUI) and Aptos (APT).

请注意，Vaneck持有SUI（SUI）和APTO（APT）。

Sui vs. Aptos: Origins and Overview

Sui与Aptos：起源和概述

Previously, we discussed the potential of Ethereum and Solana to attract billions of users into the crypto space. While both ecosystems are highly attractive, they represent early blockchain technology. Since their inception, a new generation of blockchains has emerged to break through the limitations of these systems, including Aptos and Sui, founded by former members of Facebook's blockchain project Diem.

以前，我们讨论了以太坊和Solana吸引数十亿用户进入加密货币领域的潜力。尽管两个生态系统都非常有吸引力，但它们代表了早期的区块链技术。自成立以来，新一代的区块链已经出现了，以突破由Facebook Blockchain Project Diem的前成员创立的这些系统的局限性，包括Aptos和Sui。

Diem attempted to create a stablecoin payment system for Facebook's social media platform but was shelved due to regulatory pressure. However, its technological experiments led to significant breakthroughs in the blockchain field. The most important legacy of Diem is the Move smart contract programming language—developed based on Rust, which is used by 4.3 million developers globally and is the third fastest-growing language, optimized to address the shortcomings of early smart contract languages like Ethereum's Solidity and Cardano's Haskell. Both Aptos and Sui leverage Move to build a faster, safer, and more intuitive development environment for developers. Move also enables both virtual machines (VMs) to achieve faster transaction confirmation speeds (the time users receive confirmation) and higher throughput (the volume of transactions processed by the system in a given time). The potential of Move is so great that the total market capitalization of Move-based blockchains skyrocketed from about $5 billion to $22 billion within a year.

Diem试图为Facebook的社交媒体平台创建一个稳定的支付系统，但由于监管压力而被搁置。但是，其技术实验导致区块链领域的突破。 DIEM最重要的遗产是“举动智能合同编程语言”，该语言是根据Rust开发的，该语言是由全球430万开发人员使用的，它是第三个增长最快的语言，旨在解决以太坊牢固和诸如以太坊的牢固性和智能合同语言的缺点卡达诺的哈斯克尔。 Aptos和Sui都杠杆作用，为开发人员建立更快，更安全，更直观的开发环境。移动还使这两个虚拟机（VM）都可以实现更快的交易确认速度（用户接收确认的时间）和更高的吞吐量（系统在给定时间内处理的交易量）。移动的潜力是如此之大，以至于基于移动的区块链的总市值从一年内从约50亿美元飙升至220亿美元。

Core Comparison Dimensions

核心比较维度

The size of the crypto developer community is only 1/1000 of JavaScript

加密开发人员社区的大小仅为JavaScript的1/1000

Data source: Electric Capital, Slash Data (as of 2024/12/19)

数据来源：电资本，斜线数据（截至2024/12/19）

The significance of the Move language lies in providing a more developer-friendly entry point. The crypto developer community is extremely small—Meta (Facebook) has more full-time developers than the entire crypto industry. By offering a more user-friendly and efficient language, Move is expected to attract a broader developer community, fostering experimentation and innovation. This innovation is crucial for uncovering "killer applications" that drive mass adoption. We view blockchain as an innovation experimentation platform, with its high valuation stemming from its ability to nurture applications for hundreds of millions of users. Since no one can predict how the next breakthrough application will emerge, attracting as many developers as possible to experiment is particularly critical.

移动语言的意义在于提供更友好的开发人员的入口点。 Crypto开发人员社区非常小 - Meta（Facebook）拥有的全职开发人员比整个加密行业都多。通过提供更具用户友好和高效的语言，Move有望吸引更广泛的开发人员社区，从而促进实验和创新。这项创新对于揭示推动大量采用的“杀手级应用”至关重要。我们将区块链视为一个创新实验平台，其高估归因于其培养数亿用户申请的能力。由于没有人能预测下一个突破性应用程序将如何出现，因此吸引尽可能多的开发人员进行实验至关重要。

Both Aptos and Sui combine the Move virtual machine with advanced consensus mechanisms to ensure efficient transaction validation on the network. This cutting-edge combination of virtual machines and consensus protocols forms the technical foundation that provides performance beyond previous blockchain systems. Before innovations like Solana's Firedancer prove their limitations, Sui and Aptos represent the pinnacle of blockchain technology.

APTO和SUI都将虚拟机与高级共识机制相结合，以确保网络上有效的交易验证。虚拟机和共识协议的尖端组合构成了技术基础，该基础提供了以前的区块链系统以外的性能。在索拉纳（Solana）的《解雇者》（Firnancer）这样的创新证明其局限性之前，Sui和Aptos代表了区块链技术的顶峰。

Aptos set a record of 326 million transactions in a single day on 2024/10/18 (13,300 TPS)

Aptos在2024/10/18（13,300 TPS）的一天中创造了3.26亿件交易的记录

Daily transaction peaks of various blockchains Data source: Artemis XYZ (as of 2024/12/19)

各种区块链数据来源的每日交易峰：Artemis XYZ（截至2024/12/19）

Sui and Aptos provide key blockchain technologies capable of serving hundreds of millions of users. Both outperform Solana (which sacrifices complexity for scalability) and Ethereum (which sacrifices flexibility for a rich ecosystem) in simplifying development processes and ensuring security. Tactically, Sui and Aptos offer a better experience for current core crypto use cases (speculation and value transfer); strategically, they lay the foundation for non-speculative applications such as AI agents, social media, and cloud services. While the forms of future phenomenal applications remain unknown, Sui and Aptos have already demonstrated strong potential to attract the next generation of blockchain users.

SUI和APTO提供了能够为数亿用户提供服务的关键区块链技术。在简化开发过程和确保安全性方面，均超过了Solana（为可伸缩性牺牲复杂性）和以太坊（为丰富的生态系统而牺牲灵活性）。从战术上讲，SUI和APTO为当前的Core Crypto用例（投机和价值转移）提供了更好的体验；从战略上讲，他们为非代表性应用（例如AI代理，社交媒体和云服务）奠定了基础。尽管未来现象应用的形式尚不清楚，但SUI和APTO已经表现出了吸引下一代区块链用户的强大潜力。

But what exactly makes these systems so exceptional? Which one is superior?

但是，什么使这些系统如此出色？哪一个是优越的？

Sui vs. Aptos: Blockchain Performance and Scalability

SUI与Aptos：区块链性能和可扩展性

Despite sharing the Move language gene, the blockchain architectures of the two reflect different design philosophies. Each network employs a customized version of the Move language, uniquely optimized for transaction processing.

尽管分享了移动语言基因，但两者的区块链体系结构反映了不同的设计理念。每个网络都采用移动语言的自定义版本，并为交易处理唯一优化。

When a transaction is sent to the blockchain, it carries information about the database (i.e., "state") that needs to be modified. Blockchain engineers refer to these database updates as "state changes." Most blockchains use a hierarchical validation mechanism: a single validator acts as a temporary "leader," responsible for receiving transactions, validating their validity (checking signatures, preventing double spending), ordering execution, and updating the state, with the generated transaction block broadcasted to other validating nodes. When more than two-thirds (66%) of validators reach consensus, the blockchain proceeds to process the next block.

当事务发送到区块链时，它将随附有关需要修改的数据库（即“状态”）的信息。区块链工程师将这些数据库更新称为“状态更改”。大多数区块链使用层次验证机制：单个验证器充当临时的“领导者”，负责接收交易，验证其有效性（检查签名，预防双支出），订购执行），并随着生成的交易块更新状态，到其他验证节点。当超过三分之二（66％）的验证者达成共识时，区块链将继续处理下一个区块。

Blockchain architecture can be divided into two core components:

区块链体系结构可以分为两个核心组成部分：

To enhance throughput, either block size must be increased or data processing efficiency must be optimized. Sui

为了增强吞吐量，必须提高块大小或必须优化数据处理效率。 Sui