耗资2.5亿美元的索拉纳丑闻：据称Kelsier，Jupiter和Meteora如何利用Libra的流动性来兑现，而日常交易者则损失了数十亿美元

2月14日，在加密货币市场中本来应该是另一天，这变成了自FTX（FTT）崩溃以来索拉纳（Sol）最大的丑闻之一。

Hayden Davis, the CEO of Kelsier Ventures, is accused of orchestrating liquidity manipulation schemes that allowed insiders to cash out at the top of the LIBRA pump-and-dump.

Kelsier Ventures的首席执行官Hayden Davis被指控精心策划流动性操纵计划，该计划使内部人士可以在天秤座的泵送和降点顶部兑现。

According to blockchain data, wallets linked to Kelsier were among the earliest accumulators of LIBRA tokens. These wallets dumped their holdings at the peak, leaving the public scrambling to sell before the crash.

根据区块链数据，与Kelsier相关的钱包是天秤座代币的最早蓄能器之一。这些钱包在山顶上抛弃了股份，使公众争先恐后地出售。

While Davis has denied any direct wrongdoing, his explanations have done little to convince skeptics. He admitted to controlling over $100 million tied to the project but insisted it wasn’t his. “It’s Argentina’s,” he said in an interview.

尽管戴维斯否认任何直接的不法行为，但他的解释并没有说服怀疑论者。他承认控制了与该项目有关的超过1亿美元，但坚持不是他的。他在接受采访时说：“这是阿根廷的。”

Kelsier's role in the LIBRA launch became even more evident when Davis personally introduced Kelsier to Meteora, a liquidity provider that played a crucial role in facilitating trades that allowed insiders to cash out at the top.

当戴维斯亲自将Kelsier引入Meteora时，Kelsier在天秤座发布会中的作用变得更加明显，Meteora是一家流动性提供商，在促进交易中发挥了至关重要的作用，允许内部人员兑现最高的交易。

Meteora's deep involvement in the token's liquidity mechanics quickly drew attention as the collapse of LIBRA unfolded.

随着天秤座的崩溃，Meteora对代币的流动性机制的深入参与很快引起了人们的注意。

Unlike typical meme coins, where developers provide their own liquidity, Meteora actively managed LIBRA's liquidity pools, giving it direct control over the token's market behavior.

与典型的模因硬币（开发人员提供自己的流动性）不同，Meteora积极管理天秤座的流动性池，使其直接控制着令牌的市场行为。

The first cracks appeared on Feb. 17, when DefiTuna founder Moty Povolotsky publicly confronted Meteora co-founder Ben Chow, accusing Meteora of creating a system that allowed insiders and influencers to cash out at peak prices while leaving retail traders with nothing.

第一批裂缝出现在2月17日，当时Defituna创始人Moty Povolotsky公开面对Meteora的联合创始人Ben Chow，指责Meteora创建了一个系统，该系统允许内部人士和影响者以高峰价格兑现，同时将零售商留下任何一无所有。

Surfaced chats further alleged that the liquidity structure of LIBRA resembled that of MELANIA, another token where Meteora had taken a 1% cut from its peak $100 million liquidity pool.

浮出水面聊天进一步声称，天秤座的流动性结构类似于梅拉尼亚的流动性结构，梅拉尼亚的流动性结构是梅拉尼亚（Melania）的流动性结构，而梅拉尼亚（Melania）的流动性结构从其峰值降低了1亿美元的流动性库中降低了1％。

In response, Chow denied any involvement in insider trading. In a Feb. 17 statement, he insisted, “Meteora and I personally have never received or managed any tokens on the side, do not receive knowledge or get involved with any off-chain dealings.”

作为回应，Chow否认任何参与内部交易的参与。在2月17日的声明中，他坚持说：“我和我个人从未收到或管理任何代币，没有获得知识或参与任何链子交易。”

However, while rejecting accusations of financial misconduct, Chow admitted that he had personally referred Davis and Kelsier Ventures to other projects, including MELANIA and LIBRA.

但是，在拒绝对金融不当行为的指控的同时，Chow承认他亲自将戴维斯和凯尔西尔风险投入到其他项目，包括梅拉尼亚和天秤座。

On Feb. 18, Chow announced his resignation from Meteora. According to Meow, co-founder of both Jupiter and Meteora, the decision was made because Chow had shown “a lack of judgment and care” in handling Meteora's operations.

2月18日，Chow宣布从Meteora辞职。根据木星和埃泰拉的联合创始人默维（Meow）的说法，这一决定之所以做出决定，是因为Chow在处理Meteora的行动中表现出“缺乏判断力和关心”。

Meow defended Chow's character, stating, “Ben has been an extremely helpful and kind participant in the ecosystem for a while now, as many people can attest. I ask everyone not to jump to conclusions and be as kind to him as possible as he seeks to clear his name.”

Meow为Chow的角色辩护，他说：“ Ben一直是一段时间以来在生态系统中的非常有帮助和友善的参与者，因为许多人都可以证明。我要求每个人不要得出结论，对他尽可能友善，就像他试图清除自己的名字一样。”

Despite Meow's statement and Chow's resignation, the damage to Meteora's reputation was significant. Accusations of insider trading and financial misconduct continued to swirl around the platform.

尽管Meow发表了声明和Chow的辞职，但对Meteora声誉的损害还是很大的。内幕交易和金融不当行为的指控继续在平台周围旋转。

Unlike Meteora, Jupiter didn't directly manage LIBRA's liquidity pools. But as the primary venue for LIBRA trading, its infrastructure had facilitated much of the market movement.

与Meteora不同，木星没有直接管理天秤座的流动性池。但是，作为天秤座交易的主要场所，其基础设施促进了市场的大部分发展。

Then there was the issue of leadership. Jupiter and Meteora shared a co-founder—Meow. Despite operating as separate entities for over a year, this connection raised concerns.

然后是领导问题。木星和流星分享了一个联合创始人-Meow。尽管作为独立实体运行了一年多，但这种联系引起了人们的关注。

If Meteora had insider liquidity mechanics in place, was Jupiter aware? Did anyone at Jupiter use their knowledge of the liquidity setup to gain an unfair advantage?

如果Meteora有内幕流动性机制，木星知道吗？木星上的任何人是否利用他们对流动性设置的知识来获得不公平的优势？

Meow broke his silence on Feb. 18, stating, “I’d like to reiterate my confidence that no one at Jupiter or Meteora committed any insider trading or financial wrongdoing, or received any tokens inappropriately.”

默维（Meow）在2月18日打破了沉默，他说：“我想重申我的信心，即木星或流星没有人进行任何内幕交易或财务不当行为，或者收到任何代币不当。”

He insisted that while Meteora had been running independently, Chow had made serious errors in judgment, which led to his resignation.

他坚持认为，尽管埃泰拉（Meteora）独立跑步，但乔（Chow）在审判中犯了严重的错误，这导致了他的辞职。

But not everyone was convinced. On Feb. 17, a wallet linked to a Jupiter employee was flagged for making small trades on LIBRA before the crash.

但是并不是每个人都相信。 2月17日，与木星员工相关的钱包被标记为在坠机前在天秤座进行小型交易。

The transactions were minor — ranging from $10 to $250 — but suggested that someone inside Jupiter may have had early knowledge of the token’s liquidity structure.

交易很小，从10美元到250美元不等 - 但建议木星内的某人可能早就知道了令牌的流动性结构。

Jupiter's leadership responded to all the allegations by announcing an independent legal review of the LIBRA controversy. But the firm they selected — Fenwick & West — immediately drew criticism.

木星的领导人通过宣布对天秤座争议的独立法律审查来回应所有指控。但是他们选择的公司（Fenwick＆West）立即引起了批评。

Fenwick & West had previously been linked to FTX's legal dealings, specifically in helping Sam Bankman-Fried blur the lines between FTX and Alameda Research.

Fenwick＆West先前曾与FTX的法律交易有联系，特别是帮助Sam Bankman Fried Blur Blur FTX和Alameda Research之间的界限。

Many in the Solana community saw this as an attempt to control the narrative rather than uncover the truth.

索拉纳社区中的许多人认为这是控制叙事而不是揭露真相的尝试。

After backlash, Meow admitted that Jupiter might reconsider its choice of legal counsel. But by then, the damage was already done.

在反弹之后，Meow承认木星可能会重新考虑其对法律顾问的选择。但是到那时，损坏已经造成。