Solana联合竞标Anatoly Yakovenko SLAMS Lays-2（L2）汇总

据他介绍，诸如Solana之类的第1层（L1）解决方案已经提供了有效，便宜和安全的缩放，而没有L2的复杂性。

Solana co-founder Anatoly Yakovenko has once again openly criticized Layer-2 (L2) rollups, arguing that L1 solutions like Solana already offer efficient, cheap, and secure scaling without the complexities that come with L2s.

Solana联合创始人Anatoly Yakovenko再次公开批评第2层（L2）汇总，认为Solana之类的L1解决方案已经提供了有效，便宜和安全的缩放，而没有L2的复杂性。

Hot Take on Storage and L2s

热门存储和L2S

In a post on X, Yakovenko responded to concerns about Solana’s storage capacity, saying that it generates about 80 terabytes of data annually, which he called “measly.” He went on to say that L1s cannot be "overwhelmed" by storage, dismissing the argument often used to justify the need for L2s.

在X上的一篇文章中，Yakovenko回应了对Solana的存储能力的担忧，称其每年产生约80多个数据的数据，他称之为“有些”。他接着说，L1不能通过存储“不知所措”，而是驳斥了通常用来证明对L2S的理由的论点。

“You can skip creating a valueless L2 and just launch a token. (No offense to L2s, many are nice but don't add value). But on a serious note, there is no point to multiple L2s doing parallel execution. If a single L2 can handle parallel execution (which is efficient), then it can use up all the blobs and run every use case. It is possible to have a single L2 be "overwhelmed" by demand, in which case another L2 could spin up and handle the overflow use cases. It is also possible to have multiple L2s focus on different use cases (e.g., one L2 for DeFi, another for NFTs, etc.). In this case, the L2s would cooperate and integrate with each other's language systems. Unfortunately, many L2s act parasitically, perpetuating their language ecosystems at the expense of the L1. This leads to fragmentation and a less efficient ecosystem overall. It is important to remember that the goal is to create a vibrant and sustainable ecosystem that benefits everyone. We should strive for cooperation and integration, not competition and parasitism. Let's work together to build the future of Web3!” he said.

“您可以跳过创建一个无价的L2并启动令牌。（（没有违规，L2，许多人都不错，但不要增加价值）。但是，在一个严重的注意上，多个L2s进行平行执行。单个L2可以处理并行执行（有效），那么它可以用来所有的blobs和所有的用途。旋转和处理溢出的用例也可以在不同的用例上重点放在不同的用例上（例如，一个defi，另一个用于NFT等）。重要的是要记住，目标是创建一个充满活力和可持续的生态系统，使我们应努力进行合作和融合，而不是竞争和寄生。让我们共同努力建立Web3的未来！”他说。

Solana Competes With Ethereum L2s, Not Ethereum Itself

Solana与以太坊L2竞争，而不是以太坊本身

Yakovenko claims that Solana is essentially in direct competition with every Ethereum L2, not with Ethereum itself. He highlighted that Solana’s architecture with well-separated execution and data layers on an efficient base layer makes it capable of keeping pace.

Yakovenko声称，Solana基本上与每个以太坊L2直接竞争，而不是与以太坊本身直接竞争。他强调了Solana在有效的基础层上具有完善的执行和数据层的体系结构，使其能够保持步伐。

"There is no point to multiple L2s ... if a single L2 can handle parallel execution, then it can use up all the blobspace and run every use case. It is possible to have a single L2 be "overwhelmed" by demand, in which case another L2 could spin up and handle the overflow use cases. It is also possible to have multiple L2s focus on different use cases (e.g., one L2 for DeFi, another for NFTs, etc.). In this case, the L2s would cooperate and integrate with each other's language systems. Unfortunately, many L2s act parasitically, perpetuating their language ecosystems at the expense of the L1. This leads to fragmentation and a less efficient ecosystem overall. It is important to remember that the goal is to create a vibrant and sustainable ecosystem that benefits everyone. We should strive for cooperation and integration, not competition and parasitism. Let's work together to build the future of Web3!" he further explained.

“没有多个L2的意义……如果单个L2可以处理平行执行，那么它可以用来所有的用例并运行每个用例。可以通过需求使单个L2“不知所措”，在这种情况下，另一个L2可以旋转并处理溢出案例，并处理多个L2的用例。还可以将不同的L2侧重于不同的情况。不幸的是，L2会与彼此的语言进行合作，并以L1为代价，使他们的语言生态系统持续下去。建立Web3的未来！”他进一步解释了。

According to Yakovenko, L2s rely heavily on L1s for data availability and are bogged down by intricate fraud proofs and multi-signature updates, rendering them less efficient. He believes that Solana's design, which combines a small state and efficient data layer, allows for cheaper and faster transactions compared to L2s.

根据Yakovenko的说法，L2S在很大程度上依赖L1来获得数据可用性，并因复杂的欺诈证明和多签名更新而陷入困境，从而使其效率降低。他认为，与L2S相比，Solana的设计结合了一个小的状态和有效的数据层，可以进行更便宜，更快的交易。

"The transactions in L2 are more expensive than transactions in Solana because L2s need to perform fraud proofs, which are computationally expensive. In addition, L2s are also slowed down by the need for multi-signature updates to the L1. This is because L2s are essentially "parasitic" on the L1 and must siphon off some of the L1's resources in order to operate. As a result, L2 transactions are not as cheap or fast as people think they are," Yakovenko stated.

“ L2中的交易比Solana中的交易更昂贵，因为L2需要执行欺诈证明，这些欺诈在计算上昂贵。此外，L2还可以放缓对L1的多符号更新的需求。这是因为L2S本质上是L1上的“ parasitic”，并且在L1上必须“ parasitic”，而L1的运输方式是L1的运行，而不是L1的doctains noct and of los and and of los and of losate nos and and of and of and。人们认为他们是。” Yakovenko说。

Ethereum's Strategy Faces Challenges

以太坊的战略面临挑战

On the flip side, Ethereum co-founder Joseph Lubin maintains that L2 scaling holds the key to unlocking the next chapter of the blockchain's potential. He highlighted projects like Linea and upcoming initiatives like MegaETH for delivering faster and cheaper operations.

另一方面，以太坊联合创始人约瑟夫·卢宾（Joseph Lubin）坚持认为，L2缩放是解锁区块链潜力下一章的关键。他强调了Linea等项目以及Megaeth等即将推出的计划，以提供更快，更便宜的运营。

However, Ethereum's strategy hasn't been without issues. The March 2024 Dcunu upgrade, aiming to reduce transaction fees and throughput to attract broader adoption, achieved a 95% reduction in gas prices and a 300% increase in transactions per second. As a result, by year-end, L2 transactions soared while Ethereum base-layer revenue dropped by 99%.

但是，以太坊的策略并非没有问题。 2024年3月的DCUNU升级旨在减少交易费用和吞吐量以吸引更广泛的采用，从而降低了95％的汽油价格，每秒交易增加了300％。结果，到年底，L2交易飙升，而以太坊基层收入下降了99％。

With over 140 scaling solutions and 60 roll-up networks already deployed on Ethereum, concerns about fragmentation and value capture are becoming increasingly pressing. Some users have also

由于已经部署在以太坊上的超过140个扩展解决方案和60个汇总网络，因此对分裂和价值捕获的担忧变得越来越紧迫。一些用户也有