Ripple 首席技术官 David Schwartz 引发关于比特币身份和权力动态的争论

Ripple 的首席技术官 David Schwartz 挑战了多数算力决定“比特币”定义的观点。施瓦茨质疑传统逻辑，认为理性用户优先考虑他们的利益，而不是简单地追随占主导地位的算力。他以比特币现金硬分叉为例，其中用户的决策不仅仅基于最长链规则。施瓦茨的干预鼓励人们对比特币生态系统的基本原则以及算力与用户选择之间的关系进行批判性思考。

Ripple CTO David Schwartz's Thought-Provoking Discourse on Hash Power Control in the Bitcoin Network

Ripple CTO David Schwartz 关于比特币网络算力控制的发人深省的论述

In a groundbreaking discourse, Ripple's Chief Technology Officer David Schwartz has ignited a thought-provoking debate on the pivotal role of hash power within the Bitcoin network. Sparked by a series of tweets, Schwartz's incisive insights challenge the long-held notion that the majority of hash power unequivocally determines the rightful owner of the "Bitcoin" moniker.

Ripple 首席技术官 David Schwartz 在一次开创性的演讲中引发了一场关于哈希算力在比特币网络中的关键作用的发人深省的辩论。在一系列推文的推动下，施瓦茨的深刻见解挑战了长期以来的观念，即大多数算力明确地决定了“比特币”这个绰号的合法所有者。

This discourse stems from a tweet by X user Curtis Ellis, who articulated the prevailing "BTC logic": that the majority of hash power holds the supreme authority to define and control the Bitcoin name, and that users must operate full nodes to align with hash power that adheres to their preferred ruleset.

此言论源于X用户Curtis Ellis的推文，他阐述了流行的“BTC逻辑”：多数算力拥有定义和控制比特币名称的最高权力，用户必须操作全节点以与算力保持一致遵守其首选规则集的权力。

To fully grasp the implications of this logic, it is essential to understand the fundamental architecture of the Bitcoin network. Participants, or the computers that maintain and verify the integrity of the blockchain, are known as nodes, primarily categorized as full nodes and miner nodes.

为了充分理解这一逻辑的含义，有必要了解比特币网络的基本架构。参与者，或者维护和验证区块链完整性的计算机，被称为节点，主要分为全节点和矿工节点。

Full nodes, as the name suggests, acquire and store a complete copy of the entire blockchain. By meticulously validating every block and transaction against the established network rules, full nodes serve as the gatekeepers of the Bitcoin network's security and integrity.

顾名思义，全节点获取并存储整个区块链的完整副本。通过根据既定的网络规则仔细验证每个区块和交易，全节点充当比特币网络安全性和完整性的看门人。

The Bitcoin network's unwavering stability is largely attributed to the Nakamoto consensus mechanism, with the longest chain rule being one of its key pillars. In the event of competing chains vying for legitimacy, the longest chain rule dictates that the chain with the most cumulative computational effort prevails as the official blockchain.

比特币网络的稳定性很大程度上归功于中本聪共识机制，最长链规则是其关键支柱之一。在竞争链争夺合法性的情况下，最长链规则规定累积计算量最多的链将成为官方区块链。

Challenging this long-held paradigm, Ripple CTO David Schwartz posits a fundamental question: does the congregation of the majority hash power truly confer the exclusive right to define the essence of "Bitcoin"?

为了挑战这种长期存在的范式，Ripple 首席技术官 David Schwartz 提出了一个基本问题：大多数算力的聚集是否真正赋予了定义“比特币”本质的排他性权利？

In his own words, Schwartz eloquently articulates: "Do you think a rational user says I want whatever is called bitcoin, whether it's good or bad, honest or corrupt? The former is how you tell what is bitcoin and the latter is how you get what you actually want."

施瓦茨用他自己的话雄辩地阐述道：“你认为一个理性的用户会说我想要任何所谓的比特币，无论它是好还是坏、诚实还是腐败？前者是你如何辨别什么是比特币，后者是你如何获得比特币。”你真正想要什么。”

Schwartz's thought-provoking query exposes the inherent flaw in the assumption that the majority hash power can arbitrarily dictate the true nature of Bitcoin. He further illustrates this point by referencing the pivotal Bitcoin Cash hard fork from Bitcoin in 2017.

施瓦茨发人深省的质疑暴露了大多数算力可以任意决定比特币真实性质这一假设的固有缺陷。他通过引用 2017 年比特币的关键比特币现金硬分叉进一步说明了这一点。

"When the BTC/BCH fork happened, rational users didn't say, 'I want whichever side is called 'bitcoin' afterwards.' The rule for how to tell which side is 'bitcoin' doesn't tell users which side they want to be on or get them on the side they want."

“当 BTC/BCH 分叉发生时，理性用户并没有说，‘我希望以后哪一方都被称为‘比特币’。”如何辨别哪一边是‘比特币’的规则并没有告诉用户他们想要站在哪一边，或者让他们站在他们想要的一边。”

Schwartz's astute observation highlights the fundamental disconnect between the mere technicality of hash power dominance and the multifaceted considerations that influence user preferences. The designation of "Bitcoin" is not simply a matter of technical prowess but rather a complex interplay of various factors, including community consensus, network stability, and the alignment of values with user aspirations.

施瓦茨的敏锐观察凸显了算力主导地位的技术性与影响用户偏好的多方面考虑之间的根本脱节。 “比特币”的命名不仅仅是技术实力的问题，而是各种因素复杂的相互作用，包括社区共识、网络稳定性以及价值观与用户愿望的一致性。

As the discourse unfolds, Ripple CTO David Schwartz's insightful intervention compels the Bitcoin community to critically re-examine the principles that underpin the ecosystem. His challenge to the simplistic notion of hash power supremacy opens the door to deeper discussions on the true meaning of Bitcoin and the criteria that define its legitimacy.

随着讨论的展开，Ripple 首席技术官 David Schwartz 富有洞察力的干预迫使比特币社区批判性地重新审视支撑生态系统的原则。他对算力至上的简单概念的挑战为更深入地讨论比特币的真正含义和定义其合法性的标准打开了大门。