Ripple 首席技術長 David Schwartz 引發關於比特幣身分和權力動態的爭論

Ripple 的技術長 David Schwartz 挑戰了多數算力決定「比特幣」定義的觀點。施瓦茨質疑傳統邏輯，認為理性使用者優先考慮他們的利益，而不是單純地追隨主導的算力。他以比特幣現金硬分叉為例，其中用戶的決策不僅僅基於最長鏈規則。施瓦茨的介入鼓勵人們對比特幣生態系統的基本原則以及算力與使用者選擇之間的關係進行批判性思考。

Ripple CTO David Schwartz's Thought-Provoking Discourse on Hash Power Control in the Bitcoin Network

Ripple CTO David Schwartz 關於比特幣網路算力控制的發人深省的論述

In a groundbreaking discourse, Ripple's Chief Technology Officer David Schwartz has ignited a thought-provoking debate on the pivotal role of hash power within the Bitcoin network. Sparked by a series of tweets, Schwartz's incisive insights challenge the long-held notion that the majority of hash power unequivocally determines the rightful owner of the "Bitcoin" moniker.

Ripple 技術長 David Schwartz 在一次開創性的演講中引發了一場關於哈希算力在比特幣網路中的關鍵作用的發人深省的辯論。在一系列推文的推動下，施瓦茨的深刻見解挑戰了長期以來的觀念，即大多數算力明確地決定了「比特幣」這個綽號的合法所有者。

This discourse stems from a tweet by X user Curtis Ellis, who articulated the prevailing "BTC logic": that the majority of hash power holds the supreme authority to define and control the Bitcoin name, and that users must operate full nodes to align with hash power that adheres to their preferred ruleset.

此言論源自於X用戶Curtis Ellis的推文，他闡述了流行的「BTC邏輯」：多數算力擁有定義和控制比特幣名稱的最高權力，用戶必須操作全節點以與算力保持一致遵守其首選規則集的權力。

To fully grasp the implications of this logic, it is essential to understand the fundamental architecture of the Bitcoin network. Participants, or the computers that maintain and verify the integrity of the blockchain, are known as nodes, primarily categorized as full nodes and miner nodes.

為了充分理解這邏輯的含義，有必要了解比特幣網路的基本架構。參與者，或維護和驗證區塊鏈完整性的計算機，被稱為節點，主要分為全節點和礦工節點。

Full nodes, as the name suggests, acquire and store a complete copy of the entire blockchain. By meticulously validating every block and transaction against the established network rules, full nodes serve as the gatekeepers of the Bitcoin network's security and integrity.

顧名思義，全節點獲取並儲存整個區塊鏈的完整副本。透過根據既定的網路規則仔細驗證每個區塊和交易，全節點充當比特幣網路安全性和完整性的看門人。

The Bitcoin network's unwavering stability is largely attributed to the Nakamoto consensus mechanism, with the longest chain rule being one of its key pillars. In the event of competing chains vying for legitimacy, the longest chain rule dictates that the chain with the most cumulative computational effort prevails as the official blockchain.

比特幣網路的穩定性很大程度上歸功於中本聰共識機制，最長鏈規則是其關鍵支柱之一。在競爭鏈爭奪合法性的情況下，最長鏈規則規定累積計算量最多的鏈將成為官方區塊鏈。

Challenging this long-held paradigm, Ripple CTO David Schwartz posits a fundamental question: does the congregation of the majority hash power truly confer the exclusive right to define the essence of "Bitcoin"?

為了挑戰這種長期存在的範式，Ripple 技術長 David Schwartz 提出了一個基本問題：大多數算力的聚集是否真正賦予了定義「比特幣」本質的排他性權利？

In his own words, Schwartz eloquently articulates: "Do you think a rational user says I want whatever is called bitcoin, whether it's good or bad, honest or corrupt? The former is how you tell what is bitcoin and the latter is how you get what you actually want."

施瓦茨用他自己的話雄辯地闡述道：「你認為一個理性的用戶會說我想要任何所謂的比特幣，無論它是好還是壞、誠實還是腐敗？前者是你如何辨別什麼是比特幣，後者是你如何獲得比特幣。

Schwartz's thought-provoking query exposes the inherent flaw in the assumption that the majority hash power can arbitrarily dictate the true nature of Bitcoin. He further illustrates this point by referencing the pivotal Bitcoin Cash hard fork from Bitcoin in 2017.

施瓦茨發人深省的質疑暴露了大多數算力可以任意決定比特幣真實性質這一假設的固有缺陷。他引用 2017 年比特幣的關鍵比特幣現金硬分叉進一步說明了這一點。

"When the BTC/BCH fork happened, rational users didn't say, 'I want whichever side is called 'bitcoin' afterwards.' The rule for how to tell which side is 'bitcoin' doesn't tell users which side they want to be on or get them on the side they want."

“當 BTC/BCH 分叉發生時，理性用戶並沒有說，‘我希望以後哪一方都被稱為‘比特幣’。”如何辨別哪一邊是‘比特幣’的規則並沒有告訴用戶他們想要站在哪一邊，或者讓他們站在他們想要的一邊。

Schwartz's astute observation highlights the fundamental disconnect between the mere technicality of hash power dominance and the multifaceted considerations that influence user preferences. The designation of "Bitcoin" is not simply a matter of technical prowess but rather a complex interplay of various factors, including community consensus, network stability, and the alignment of values with user aspirations.

施瓦茨的敏銳觀察凸顯了算力主導地位的技術性與影響使用者偏好的多面向考量之間的根本脫節。 「比特幣」的命名不僅僅是技術實力的問題，而是各種因素複雜的相互作用，包括社群共識、網路穩定性以及價值觀與用戶意願的一致性。

As the discourse unfolds, Ripple CTO David Schwartz's insightful intervention compels the Bitcoin community to critically re-examine the principles that underpin the ecosystem. His challenge to the simplistic notion of hash power supremacy opens the door to deeper discussions on the true meaning of Bitcoin and the criteria that define its legitimacy.

隨著討論的展開，Ripple 首席技術長 David Schwartz 富有洞察力的干預迫使比特幣社群批判性地重新審視支撐生態系統的原則。他對算力至上的簡單概念的挑戰為更深入地討論比特幣的真正含義和定義其合法性的標準打開了大門。