|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proton 是一个基于区块链的平台,以其注重隐私的产品而闻名,它强烈反对 Swan Bitcoin 提起的诉讼,并将其标记为“致命缺陷”。
Proton Pushes Back Against Swan Bitcoin Lawsuit, Calling It ‘Fatally Flawed'
Proton 反击 Swan 比特币诉讼,称其“存在致命缺陷”
Proton, a blockchain platform known for its privacy-focused products, is pushing back strongly against a lawsuit filed by Swan Bitcoin, labeling it as “fatally flawed.”
Proton 是一个以其注重隐私的产品而闻名的区块链平台,它强烈反对 Swan Bitcoin 提起的诉讼,并将其标记为“存在致命缺陷”。
In a recent legal motion, Proton's legal team has requested the court dismiss the lawsuit, claiming that Swan Bitcoin's case is built on faulty legal reasoning and lacks the necessary evidence to proceed.
在最近的一项法律动议中,Proton 的法律团队要求法院驳回诉讼,声称 Swan Bitcoin 的案件建立在错误的法律推理之上,并且缺乏继续审理所需的证据。
Earlier this year, Swan Bitcoin, a popular Bitcoin-only financial services platform, filed a lawsuit against Proton accusing the platform of trademark infringement and other legal violations.
今年早些时候,流行的纯比特币金融服务平台 Swan Bitcoin 对 Proton 提起诉讼,指控该平台侵犯商标权和其他违法行为。
According to Swan Bitcoin, Proton's actions allegedly misrepresented its brand and confused consumers in the digital currency space.
据 Swan Bitcoin 称,Proton 的行为涉嫌歪曲其品牌,并使数字货币领域的消费者感到困惑。
However, Proton has vigorously denied these allegations, arguing that the claims hold no legal merit and that Swan Bitcoin's case fails to meet the basic standards required for a legitimate legal complaint.
然而,Proton 极力否认这些指控,认为这些指控没有法律依据,并且 Swan Bitcoin 的案件不符合合法法律投诉所需的基本标准。
Proton's representatives argued in their motion to dismiss that the lawsuit should be thrown out due to its lack of solid legal grounds.
宝腾的代表在驳回动议中辩称,由于缺乏坚实的法律依据,应驳回该诉讼。
“This case is fatally flawed because it does not show any actual harm or confusion in the marketplace,” the platform's attorney stated in their defense.
该平台的律师在辩护中表示:“本案存在致命缺陷,因为它没有显示出市场存在任何实际损害或混乱。”
The defense highlighted that Swan Bitcoin failed to provide evidence demonstrating that any consumers were misled or that Proton's branding or products had any meaningful impact on Swan Bitcoin's business.
辩方强调,Swan Bitcoin 未能提供证据证明任何消费者被误导,或者 Proton 的品牌或产品对 Swan Bitcoin 的业务产生任何有意义的影响。
Proton's legal team also argued that Swan Bitcoin's claim of trademark infringement was overly broad and failed to show how Proton's activities directly violated the law.
Proton 的法律团队还辩称,Swan Bitcoin 的商标侵权主张过于宽泛,未能表明 Proton 的活动如何直接违反法律。
“Not every company in the crypto space can claim exclusive rights over generic terms or concepts, and Swan Bitcoin's attempt to do so is legally unsound,” said one of Proton's representatives.
Proton 的一位代表表示:“并非加密领域的每家公司都可以对通用术语或概念主张专有权利,而 Swan Bitcoin 的尝试在法律上是不合理的。”
The defense further added that the lawsuit is “an unnecessary distraction in a rapidly evolving industry” and that Swan Bitcoin's legal strategy seems more like an attempt to stifle competition than a legitimate effort to protect intellectual property.
辩方进一步补充说,该诉讼“在快速发展的行业中是不必要的干扰”,Swan Bitcoin 的法律策略似乎更像是试图扼杀竞争,而不是保护知识产权的合法努力。
This lawsuit, although specific to Proton and Swan Bitcoin, could set a precedent in the wider cryptocurrency industry, particularly around issues of branding, competition, and intellectual property rights.
该诉讼虽然针对 Proton 和 Swan 比特币,但可能会在更广泛的加密货币行业树立先例,特别是在品牌、竞争和知识产权问题方面。
As the crypto space becomes more crowded with startups and established companies, the potential for disputes over trademarks, patents, and proprietary technologies is likely to increase.
随着加密货币领域越来越挤满初创公司和老牌公司,有关商标、专利和专有技术的争议的可能性可能会增加。
If Proton's motion to dismiss is successful, it may deter other companies from filing similar lawsuits, potentially creating a more collaborative environment within the blockchain and cryptocurrency sectors.
如果 Proton 的驳回动议成功,可能会阻止其他公司提起类似诉讼,从而有可能在区块链和加密货币领域创造一个更具协作性的环境。
On the other hand, if Swan Bitcoin claims to succeed, it could embolden more companies to take legal action over perceived infringements, potentially leading to a surge in litigation within the industry.
另一方面,如果 Swan Bitcoin 声称成功,它可能会鼓励更多公司对涉嫌侵权的行为采取法律行动,从而可能导致行业内诉讼激增。
“While innovation thrives on competition, frivolous lawsuits have the potential to stifle that progress. The real focus should be on building technology that serves users, not on legal battles that drain resources and create unnecessary tension in the industry,” a Proton spokesperson commented.
“虽然创新在竞争中蓬勃发展,但无聊的诉讼有可能扼杀这种进步。真正的重点应该是构建为用户服务的技术,而不是消耗资源并在行业中造成不必要紧张的法律斗争。”Proton 发言人评论道。
As the case progresses, the outcome will be watched closely by many within the crypto community.
随着案件的进展,加密社区内的许多人将密切关注结果。
Whether the court sides with Proton or Swan Bitcoin could have significant implications for how companies in the cryptocurrency space handle intellectual property disputes moving forward.
法院是否支持 Proton 还是 Swan Bitcoin 可能会对加密货币领域的公司如何处理未来的知识产权纠纷产生重大影响。
The stakes are high, and the decision could influence the future of competition and innovation within the rapidly growing blockchain industry.
风险很高,这一决定可能会影响快速发展的区块链行业的竞争和创新的未来。
免责声明:info@kdj.com
所提供的信息并非交易建议。根据本文提供的信息进行的任何投资,kdj.com不承担任何责任。加密货币具有高波动性,强烈建议您深入研究后,谨慎投资!
如您认为本网站上使用的内容侵犯了您的版权,请立即联系我们(info@kdj.com),我们将及时删除。
-
- 选举模因硬币有投资前景吗?
- 2024-10-03 04:35:01
- 距离美国总统选举还有一个多月了,PolitiFi meme 币正在飙升。例如,Jeo Boden (BODEN) 今天上涨了近 30%