|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proton 是一個基於區塊鏈的平台,以其註重隱私的產品而聞名,它強烈反對 Swan Bitcoin 提起的訴訟,並將其標記為「致命缺陷」。
Proton Pushes Back Against Swan Bitcoin Lawsuit, Calling It ‘Fatally Flawed'
Proton 反擊 Swan 比特幣訴訟,稱其“存在致命缺陷”
Proton, a blockchain platform known for its privacy-focused products, is pushing back strongly against a lawsuit filed by Swan Bitcoin, labeling it as “fatally flawed.”
Proton 是一個以其註重隱私的產品而聞名的區塊鏈平台,它強烈反對 Swan Bitcoin 提起的訴訟,並將其標記為「存在致命缺陷」。
In a recent legal motion, Proton's legal team has requested the court dismiss the lawsuit, claiming that Swan Bitcoin's case is built on faulty legal reasoning and lacks the necessary evidence to proceed.
在最近的一項法律動議中,Proton 的法律團隊要求法院駁回訴訟,聲稱 Swan Bitcoin 的案件建立在錯誤的法律推理之上,並且缺乏繼續審理所需的證據。
Earlier this year, Swan Bitcoin, a popular Bitcoin-only financial services platform, filed a lawsuit against Proton accusing the platform of trademark infringement and other legal violations.
今年早些時候,流行的純比特幣金融服務平台 Swan Bitcoin 對 Proton 提起訴訟,指控該平台侵犯商標權和其他違法行為。
According to Swan Bitcoin, Proton's actions allegedly misrepresented its brand and confused consumers in the digital currency space.
據 Swan Bitcoin 稱,Proton 的行為涉嫌歪曲其品牌,並使數位貨幣領域的消費者感到困惑。
However, Proton has vigorously denied these allegations, arguing that the claims hold no legal merit and that Swan Bitcoin's case fails to meet the basic standards required for a legitimate legal complaint.
然而,Proton 極力否認這些指控,認為這些指控沒有法律依據,且 Swan Bitcoin 的案件不符合合法法律投訴所需的基本標準。
Proton's representatives argued in their motion to dismiss that the lawsuit should be thrown out due to its lack of solid legal grounds.
寶騰的代表在駁回動議中辯稱,由於缺乏堅實的法律依據,應駁回該訴訟。
“This case is fatally flawed because it does not show any actual harm or confusion in the marketplace,” the platform's attorney stated in their defense.
該平台的律師在辯護中表示:“本案存在致命缺陷,因為它沒有顯示出市場存在任何實際損害或混亂。”
The defense highlighted that Swan Bitcoin failed to provide evidence demonstrating that any consumers were misled or that Proton's branding or products had any meaningful impact on Swan Bitcoin's business.
辯方強調,Swan Bitcoin 未能提供證據證明任何消費者被誤導,或 Proton 的品牌或產品對 Swan Bitcoin 的業務產生任何有意義的影響。
Proton's legal team also argued that Swan Bitcoin's claim of trademark infringement was overly broad and failed to show how Proton's activities directly violated the law.
Proton 的法律團隊還辯稱,Swan Bitcoin 的商標侵權主張過於寬泛,未能表明 Proton 的活動如何直接違反法律。
“Not every company in the crypto space can claim exclusive rights over generic terms or concepts, and Swan Bitcoin's attempt to do so is legally unsound,” said one of Proton's representatives.
Proton 的一位代表表示:“並非加密領域的每家公司都可以對通用術語或概念主張專有權利,而 Swan Bitcoin 的嘗試在法律上是不合理的。”
The defense further added that the lawsuit is “an unnecessary distraction in a rapidly evolving industry” and that Swan Bitcoin's legal strategy seems more like an attempt to stifle competition than a legitimate effort to protect intellectual property.
辯方進一步補充說,該訴訟“在快速發展的行業中是不必要的干擾”,Swan Bitcoin 的法律策略似乎更像是試圖扼殺競爭,而不是保護智慧財產權的合法努力。
This lawsuit, although specific to Proton and Swan Bitcoin, could set a precedent in the wider cryptocurrency industry, particularly around issues of branding, competition, and intellectual property rights.
該訴訟雖然針對 Proton 和 Swan 比特幣,但可能會在更廣泛的加密貨幣行業中樹立先例,特別是在品牌、競爭和智慧財產權問題方面。
As the crypto space becomes more crowded with startups and established companies, the potential for disputes over trademarks, patents, and proprietary technologies is likely to increase.
隨著加密貨幣領域越來越擠滿新創公司和老牌公司,有關商標、專利和專有技術的爭議的可能性可能會增加。
If Proton's motion to dismiss is successful, it may deter other companies from filing similar lawsuits, potentially creating a more collaborative environment within the blockchain and cryptocurrency sectors.
如果 Proton 的駁回動議成功,可能會阻止其他公司提起類似訴訟,從而有可能在區塊鏈和加密貨幣領域創造一個更具協作性的環境。
On the other hand, if Swan Bitcoin claims to succeed, it could embolden more companies to take legal action over perceived infringements, potentially leading to a surge in litigation within the industry.
另一方面,如果 Swan Bitcoin 聲稱成功,它可能會鼓勵更多公司對涉嫌侵權的行為採取法律行動,這可能導致行業內訴訟激增。
“While innovation thrives on competition, frivolous lawsuits have the potential to stifle that progress. The real focus should be on building technology that serves users, not on legal battles that drain resources and create unnecessary tension in the industry,” a Proton spokesperson commented.
「雖然創新在競爭中蓬勃發展,但無聊的訴訟有可能扼殺這種進步。真正的重點應該是建立為用戶服務的技術,而不是消耗資源並在行業中造成不必要緊張的法律鬥爭。
As the case progresses, the outcome will be watched closely by many within the crypto community.
隨著案件的進展,加密社區內的許多人將密切關注結果。
Whether the court sides with Proton or Swan Bitcoin could have significant implications for how companies in the cryptocurrency space handle intellectual property disputes moving forward.
法院是否支持 Proton 還是 Swan Bitcoin 可能會對加密貨幣領域的公司如何處理未來的智慧財產權糾紛產生重大影響。
The stakes are high, and the decision could influence the future of competition and innovation within the rapidly growing blockchain industry.
風險很高,這項決定可能會影響快速發展的區塊鏈產業的競爭和創新的未來。
免責聲明:info@kdj.com
所提供的資訊並非交易建議。 kDJ.com對任何基於本文提供的資訊進行的投資不承擔任何責任。加密貨幣波動性較大,建議您充分研究後謹慎投資!
如果您認為本網站使用的內容侵犯了您的版權,請立即聯絡我們(info@kdj.com),我們將及時刪除。
-
- 加密貨幣市場進入新季度,新一輪看漲預期不斷增強
- 2024-10-03 04:40:02
- 儘管人們對以太坊 ETF 的興趣不斷增長,但它仍難以吸引應有的關注,從而在該領域引起了相當複雜的反應。
-
- 選舉模因硬幣有投資前景嗎?
- 2024-10-03 04:35:01
- 距離美國總統選舉還有一個多月了,PolitiFi meme 幣正在飆升。例如,Jeo Boden (BODEN) 今天上漲了近 30%