😱Mantra（OM）因涉嫌流动性操纵而受到抨击

咒语（OM）声称该项目膨胀了其贸易活动和流动性以攀升加密货币市场上限的排名后，咒语（OM）正面临严重的指控。

Mantranetwork (OM) is facing serious allegations after claims emerged that the project inflated its trading activity and liquidity in an attempt to climb the crypto market cap rankings.

Mantranetwork（OM）在宣称该项目膨胀其交易活动和流动性以攀登加密市政上限排名以来，面临严重的指控。

A recent episode of The Chopping Block podcast suggests that Mantra, alongside its market makers, engaged in practices to simulate high trading volume by transferring tokens between controlled wallets and exchanges.

Chopping Block播客的最新一集表明，咒语与市销商一起，通过在受控钱包和交易所之间转移令牌来模拟高额交易量的实践。

However, less than 1% of OM tokens were allegedly available for public trading at any given time. The tokens were reportedly cycled through selected wallets to create the illusion of deep liquidity.

但是，据称，在任何给定时间，只有不到1％的OM令牌可用于公共交易。据报道，这些令牌是通过选定的钱包循环的，以产生深厚流动性的幻想。

As a result, OM managed to briefly become a top-25 token by market cap. But when a major holder attempted to sell out of their coins, the token price dropped by 90% in a mere 90 minutes—highlighting the complete lack of liquidity.

结果，OM设法简要成为市场上限的前25个代币。但是，当一个主要持有人试图卖掉硬币时，象征性的价格在仅90分钟内下降了90％，这是完全不足的流动性。

This blatant manipulation came to light due to gaps in data verification on platforms like CoinMarketCap and CoinGecko, which often rely on self-reported data from projects.

这种公然的操作由于在CoinMarketCap和Coingecko等平台上的数据验证中的差距而浮出水面，这些平台通常依赖于项目中的自我报告的数据。

The report by The Block highlights several major concerns arising from this case:

该街区的报告强调了由于这种情况引起的几个主要问题：

* Artificial volume created a false sense of demand for the token.

*人造体积对令牌产生了错误的需求感。

* Shallow liquidity at major exchanges went undetected.

*主要交流的浅流动性未被发现。

* Billions in market cap vanished almost instantly due to a lack of buyers.

*由于缺乏买家，数十亿美元的市值几乎立即消失。

To prevent similar cases in the future, the report proposes several solutions, such as mandatory disclosure of market-making partnerships, market-making rebates, and trading agreements. It also suggests on-chain verification of token distribution and wallet ownership before project listings.

为了防止将来类似的案件，该报告提出了多种解决方案，例如强制性披露市政伙伴关系，营销折扣和交易协议。它还建议在项目列表之前对令牌分销和钱包所有权进行链链验证。

However, the report notes that market makers may resist disclosing these partnerships and that despite good intentions, the lack of regulation may lead to inconsistent enforcement of these measures across platforms.

但是，该报告指出，做市商可能会拒绝披露这些伙伴关系，尽管有良好的意图，但缺乏法规可能导致跨平台上这些措施的执行不一致。