😱Mantra（OM）因涉嫌流動性操縱而受到抨擊

咒語（OM）聲稱該項目膨脹了其貿易活動和流動性以攀升加密貨幣市場上限的排名後，咒語（OM）正面臨嚴重的指控。

Mantranetwork (OM) is facing serious allegations after claims emerged that the project inflated its trading activity and liquidity in an attempt to climb the crypto market cap rankings.

Mantranetwork（OM）在宣稱該項目膨脹其交易活動和流動性以攀登加密市政上限排名以來，面臨嚴重的指控。

A recent episode of The Chopping Block podcast suggests that Mantra, alongside its market makers, engaged in practices to simulate high trading volume by transferring tokens between controlled wallets and exchanges.

Chopping Block播客的最新一集表明，咒語與市銷商一起，通過在受控錢包和交易所之間轉移令牌來模擬高額交易量的實踐。

However, less than 1% of OM tokens were allegedly available for public trading at any given time. The tokens were reportedly cycled through selected wallets to create the illusion of deep liquidity.

但是，據稱，在任何給定時間，只有不到1％的OM令牌可用於公共交易。據報導，這些令牌是通過選定的錢包循環的，以產生深厚流動性的幻想。

As a result, OM managed to briefly become a top-25 token by market cap. But when a major holder attempted to sell out of their coins, the token price dropped by 90% in a mere 90 minutes—highlighting the complete lack of liquidity.

結果，OM設法簡要成為市場上限的前25個代幣。但是，當一個主要持有人試圖賣掉硬幣時，象徵性的價格在僅90分鐘內下降了90％，這是完全不足的流動性。

This blatant manipulation came to light due to gaps in data verification on platforms like CoinMarketCap and CoinGecko, which often rely on self-reported data from projects.

這種公然的操作由於在CoinMarketCap和Coingecko等平台上的數據驗證中的差距而浮出水面，這些平台通常依賴於項目中的自我報告的數據。

The report by The Block highlights several major concerns arising from this case:

該街區的報告強調了由於這種情況引起的幾個主要問題：

* Artificial volume created a false sense of demand for the token.

*人造體積對令牌產生了錯誤的需求感。

* Shallow liquidity at major exchanges went undetected.

*主要交流的淺流動性未被發現。

* Billions in market cap vanished almost instantly due to a lack of buyers.

*由於缺乏買家，數十億美元的市值幾乎立即消失。

To prevent similar cases in the future, the report proposes several solutions, such as mandatory disclosure of market-making partnerships, market-making rebates, and trading agreements. It also suggests on-chain verification of token distribution and wallet ownership before project listings.

為了防止將來類似的案件，該報告提出了多種解決方案，例如強制性披露市政夥伴關係，營銷折扣和交易協議。它還建議在項目列表之前對令牌分銷和錢包所有權進行鍊鍊驗證。

However, the report notes that market makers may resist disclosing these partnerships and that despite good intentions, the lack of regulation may lead to inconsistent enforcement of these measures across platforms.

但是，該報告指出，做市商可能會拒絕披露這些夥伴關係，儘管有良好的意圖，但缺乏法規可能導致跨平台上這些措施的執行不一致。