在批评果冻Memecoin删除后，Hyplliquid引入了链上验证，用于资产降落

在重大批评之后，Hyperliquid是一个分散的永久交易平台，已对其区块链基础架构引入了重大变化

Hyperliquid, the decentralized perpetuals trading platform, has announced major changes to its blockchain infrastructure. This follows significant criticism that arose from the platform's handling of the DELLY memecoin delisting, which occurred following a $6 million exploit that involved a whale forcing a short squeeze on the token.

分散的永久交易平台Hyperliquid宣布了其区块链基础设施的重大变化。这在于平台对杜莉·梅肯（Delly Memecoin）的处理的重大批评，这是在耗资600万美元的漏洞中发生的，这涉及一条鲸鱼，迫使鲸鱼迫使代币短暂挤压。

To improve governance and prevent further backlash, Hyperliquid has now implemented fully on-chain validation for asset delisting. This process allows a quorum of validator stakes to autonomously trigger asset removal without relying on off-chain coordination.

为了改善治理并防止进一步的反对，Hyproliquid现在已经实施了全面的链上验证资产降级。此过程允许验证赌注的法定人数自主触发资产删除而无需依赖链的协调。

The move is part of broader efforts to enhance transparency and trust within the Hyperliquid ecosystem, giving the community a more direct role in asset management. The platform also aims to respond to criticism it faced over its handling of the JELLY delisting, which sparked debate about centralization and governance within the platform.

此举是增强超流动生态系统中透明度和信任的更广泛努力的一部分，使社区在资产管理中发挥了更直接的作用。该平台还旨在回应其对果冻的处理面临的批评，这引发了有关平台内集中化和治理的辩论。

Indeed, critics had slammed the platform for moving too quickly to delist the token and for not being transparent enough about the decision. They also raised concerns about the platform's governance and how it handled the situation.

的确，批评者抨击了平台，以至于太快地将其贴上了代币，并且对该决定不够透明。他们还对平台的治理以及如何处理局势提出了担忧。

"The MYRO perps validator vote to delist will be around 13:00 UTC on March 29th, as the Hyper Foundation validators vote to delist MYRO perps," Hyperliquid said in a recent post on X.

Hyperliquid在X最近的一篇文章中说：“ Myro Perps验证者投票将在3月29日的13:00 UTC左右，因为Hyper Foundation验证者对Delist Myro Perps进行了投票。”

"We will be closing votes off-chain for clarity, but we are committed to strengthening the on-chain governance system."

“为了清楚起见，我们将在链上结束选票，但我们致力于加强链政治体系。”

The platform added that it is focused on refining its governance model, which includes further decentralizing validator voting and ensuring that its platform remains transparent and accessible.

该平台补充说，它专注于完善其治理模型，其中包括进一步分散验证者投票并确保其平台保持透明且可访问。

Earlier this year, the Hyperliquid team stated that it would reimburse users who were affected by the incident and that the lessons learned would strengthen the network in the long term.

今年早些时候，超流动团队表示，它将偿还受事件影响的用户，并且所学到的经验教训将长期增强网络。

"As we navigate the dynamic landscape of the Web3 ecosystem, we remain committed to integrating user feedback and fostering a truly decentralized community," the team said.

该团队说：“当我们浏览Web3生态系统的动态格局时，我们仍然致力于整合用户反馈并培养真正的分散社区。”

However, despite these efforts, there are still concerns about centralization within Hyperliquid.

但是，尽管做出了这些努力，但仍然担心超流动液中的集中化。

One of the main points of contention is the platform's control over a significant portion of staked HYPE tokens. Hyperliquid controls 81% of the staked HYPE tokens, which many in the community see as a sign of centralization that contradicts the platform's claim of being a decentralized exchange.

争论的主要要点之一是该平台对大部分固定炒作令牌的控制权的控制。超流动性控制着81％的粘贴炒作令牌，许多人在社区中将其视为集中化的标志，这与该平台声称是分散交流的声称相矛盾。

The exchange has also been criticized for limiting transparency and restricting participation, which has led some to question the platform's commitment to true decentralization.

该交流还因限制透明度和限制参与而受到批评，这使一些人质疑该平台对真正权力下放的承诺。

Among those who criticized Hyperliquid was Bitget CEO Gracy Chen, who said that the way the platform handled the JELLY incident was "immature, unethical, and unprofessional."

在批评Hypliquid的人中，Bitget首席执行官Gracy Chen说，该平台处理果冻事件的方式“不成熟，不道德和不专业”。

This criticism raised concerns about the platform's integrity and trustworthiness, especially in light of its earlier claims about decentralization.

这种批评引起了人们对平台的完整性和可信赖性的关注，尤其是鉴于其对权力下放的早期主张。

"It's not the simplest or the easiest to handle such an incident, but it's about choosing to do the right thing despite the difficulties that may arise," Chen added.

Chen补充说：“处理此类事件并不是最简单或最容易的事情，而是选择做正确的事情，尽管可能会出现正确的事情。”

Meanwhile, blockchain analyst ZackXBT pointed out inconsistencies in Hyperliquid's approach to governance.

同时，区块链分析师ZackXBT指出了超流动性治理方法的不一致。

According to the analyst, the platform was more willing to act when it benefited its interests. For example, when a large trader exploited a liquidation vulnerability in an attempt to steal funds, Hyperliquid intervened quickly to close the position and prevent further losses.

根据分析师的说法，该平台在使其利益受益时更愿意采取行动。例如，当一个大型交易者利用清算漏洞以试图窃取资金时，超级流动性迅速介入以关闭该职位并防止进一步的损失。

However, when it came to community initiatives like a proposal to create a HYPE liquid mining program, the response was slower, and the project ultimately stalled due to a lack of urgency from the Hyperliquid team.

但是，当谈到社区倡议，例如提出制定炒作液体采矿计划的提议时，该响应速度较慢，并且由于超流动团队缺乏紧迫性，该项目最终停滞不前。

This inconsistency in governance priorities raised concerns about the platform's commitment to fostering a truly decentralized environment where community proposals and initiatives are treated with the same urgency and importance as internal operational issues.

治理优先事项的这种不一致引起了人们对平台致力于促进真正分散环境的承诺的担忧，在这种环境中，社区建议和倡议受到与内部操作问题相同的紧迫性和重要性的对待。