在批評果凍Memecoin刪除後，Hyplliquid引入了鏈上驗證，用於資產降落

在重大批評之後，Hyperliquid是一個分散的永久交易平台，已對其區塊鏈基礎架構引入了重大變化

Hyperliquid, the decentralized perpetuals trading platform, has announced major changes to its blockchain infrastructure. This follows significant criticism that arose from the platform's handling of the DELLY memecoin delisting, which occurred following a $6 million exploit that involved a whale forcing a short squeeze on the token.

分散的永久交易平台Hyperliquid宣布了其區塊鏈基礎設施的重大變化。這在於平台對杜莉·梅肯（Delly Memecoin）的處理的重大批評，這是在耗資600萬美元的漏洞中發生的，這涉及一條鯨魚，迫使鯨魚迫使代幣短暫擠壓。

To improve governance and prevent further backlash, Hyperliquid has now implemented fully on-chain validation for asset delisting. This process allows a quorum of validator stakes to autonomously trigger asset removal without relying on off-chain coordination.

為了改善治理並防止進一步的反對，Hyproliquid現在已經實施了全面的鏈上驗證資產降級。此過程允許驗證賭注的法定人數自主觸發資產刪除而無需依賴鏈的協調。

The move is part of broader efforts to enhance transparency and trust within the Hyperliquid ecosystem, giving the community a more direct role in asset management. The platform also aims to respond to criticism it faced over its handling of the JELLY delisting, which sparked debate about centralization and governance within the platform.

此舉是增強超流動生態系統中透明度和信任的更廣泛努力的一部分，使社區在資產管理中發揮了更直接的作用。該平台還旨在回應其對果凍的處理面臨的批評，這引發了有關平台內集中化和治理的辯論。

Indeed, critics had slammed the platform for moving too quickly to delist the token and for not being transparent enough about the decision. They also raised concerns about the platform's governance and how it handled the situation.

的確，批評者抨擊了平台，以至於太快地將其貼上了代幣，並且對該決定不夠透明。他們還對平台的治理以及如何處理局勢提出了擔憂。

"The MYRO perps validator vote to delist will be around 13:00 UTC on March 29th, as the Hyper Foundation validators vote to delist MYRO perps," Hyperliquid said in a recent post on X.

Hyperliquid在X最近的一篇文章中說：“ Myro Perps驗證者投票將在3月29日的13:00 UTC左右，因為Hyper Foundation驗證者對Delist Myro Perps進行了投票。”

"We will be closing votes off-chain for clarity, but we are committed to strengthening the on-chain governance system."

“為了清楚起見，我們將在鏈上結束選票，但我們致力於加強鏈政治體系。”

The platform added that it is focused on refining its governance model, which includes further decentralizing validator voting and ensuring that its platform remains transparent and accessible.

該平台補充說，它專注於完善其治理模型，其中包括進一步分散驗證者投票並確保其平台保持透明且可訪問。

Earlier this year, the Hyperliquid team stated that it would reimburse users who were affected by the incident and that the lessons learned would strengthen the network in the long term.

今年早些時候，超流動團隊表示，它將償還受事件影響的用戶，並且所學到的經驗教訓將長期增強網絡。

"As we navigate the dynamic landscape of the Web3 ecosystem, we remain committed to integrating user feedback and fostering a truly decentralized community," the team said.

該團隊說：“當我們瀏覽Web3生態系統的動態格局時，我們仍然致力於整合用戶反饋並培養真正的分散社區。”

However, despite these efforts, there are still concerns about centralization within Hyperliquid.

但是，儘管做出了這些努力，但仍然擔心超流動液中的集中化。

One of the main points of contention is the platform's control over a significant portion of staked HYPE tokens. Hyperliquid controls 81% of the staked HYPE tokens, which many in the community see as a sign of centralization that contradicts the platform's claim of being a decentralized exchange.

爭論的主要要點之一是該平台對大部分固定炒作令牌的控制權的控制。超流動性控制著81％的粘貼炒作令牌，許多人在社區中將其視為集中化的標誌，這與該平台聲稱是分散交流的聲稱相矛盾。

The exchange has also been criticized for limiting transparency and restricting participation, which has led some to question the platform's commitment to true decentralization.

該交流還因限制透明度和限制參與而受到批評，這使一些人質疑該平台對真正權力下放的承諾。

Among those who criticized Hyperliquid was Bitget CEO Gracy Chen, who said that the way the platform handled the JELLY incident was "immature, unethical, and unprofessional."

在批評Hypliquid的人中，Bitget首席執行官Gracy Chen說，該平台處理果凍事件的方式“不成熟，不道德和不專業”。

This criticism raised concerns about the platform's integrity and trustworthiness, especially in light of its earlier claims about decentralization.

這種批評引起了人們對平台的完整性和可信賴性的關注，尤其是鑑於其對權力下放的早期主張。

"It's not the simplest or the easiest to handle such an incident, but it's about choosing to do the right thing despite the difficulties that may arise," Chen added.

Chen補充說：“處理此類事件並不是最簡單或最容易的事情，而是選擇做正確的事情，儘管可能會出現正確的事情。”

Meanwhile, blockchain analyst ZackXBT pointed out inconsistencies in Hyperliquid's approach to governance.

同時，區塊鏈分析師ZackXBT指出了超流動性治理方法的不一致。

According to the analyst, the platform was more willing to act when it benefited its interests. For example, when a large trader exploited a liquidation vulnerability in an attempt to steal funds, Hyperliquid intervened quickly to close the position and prevent further losses.

根據分析師的說法，該平台在使其利益受益時更願意採取行動。例如，當一個大型交易者利用清算漏洞以試圖竊取資金時，超級流動性迅速介入以關閉該職位並防止進一步的損失。

However, when it came to community initiatives like a proposal to create a HYPE liquid mining program, the response was slower, and the project ultimately stalled due to a lack of urgency from the Hyperliquid team.

但是，當談到社區倡議，例如提出製定炒作液體採礦計劃的提議時，該響應速度較慢，並且由於超流動團隊缺乏緊迫性，該項目最終停滯不前。

This inconsistency in governance priorities raised concerns about the platform's commitment to fostering a truly decentralized environment where community proposals and initiatives are treated with the same urgency and importance as internal operational issues.

治理優先事項的這種不一致引起了人們對平台致力於促進真正分散環境的承諾的擔憂，在這種環境中，社區建議和倡議受到與內部操作問題相同的緊迫性和重要性的對待。