|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
在 HBO 的新纪录片《Money Electric:比特币神秘纪录片》中,电影制片人卡伦·霍巴克 (Cullen Hobak) 认为,加拿大著名比特币核心开发者彼得·托德 (Peter Todd) 就是难以捉摸的比特币创造者,即中本聪 (Satoshi Nakamoto)。尽管这些说法很耸人听闻,但所提供的证据还不够确凿,导致比特币社区的严厉批评。
Filmmaker Cullen Hobak's new HBO documentary, “Money Electric: The Bitcoin Mystery Documentary,” has sparked controversy by suggesting that prominent Canadian Bitcoin core developer Peter Todd is the true identity behind Satoshi Nakamoto, the enigmatic creator of Bitcoin. Despite the bold claims, a closer examination of the evidence presented in the documentary reveals several inconsistencies and flaws that cast doubt on the validity of this theory.
电影制片人卡伦·霍巴克 (Cullen Hobak) 的新 HBO 纪录片《金钱电子:比特币之谜纪录片》因暗示加拿大著名比特币核心开发者彼得·托德 (Peter Todd) 是比特币神秘创造者中本聪 (Satoshi Nakamoto) 的真实身份而引发争议。尽管提出了大胆的主张,但对纪录片中提供的证据进行仔细检查后发现,存在一些不一致和缺陷,使人们对该理论的有效性产生了怀疑。
Todd, who joined the Bitcoin project in 2012, is known for his significant contributions to Bitcoin's development post-2012, including the introduction of the replace-by-fee (RBF) protocol and his work on OpenTimestamps. However, the documentary's attempt to link him with the creation of Bitcoin has raised skepticism and criticism due to the disparities in timelines and the nature of the evidence presented.
Todd 于 2012 年加入比特币项目,因其对 2012 年后比特币发展的重大贡献而闻名,包括引入收费替代 (RBF) 协议以及他在 OpenTimestamps 方面的工作。然而,由于时间线和证据性质的差异,这部纪录片试图将他与比特币的创造联系起来,引起了怀疑和批评。
The documentary builds its case around four main points, which have been analyzed and refuted by members of the BTC community.
这部纪录片围绕四个要点展开论证,比特币社区成员对这些要点进行了分析和反驳。
#1 Use Of A Pseudonym For Credibility
#1 使用化名以提高可信度
The HBO documentary suggests that Todd adopted the Satoshi Nakamoto pseudonym to lend Bitcoin the necessary credibility during its inception. However, this claim is questionable as in 2008, when the BTC whitepaper was published, Todd was completing a fine arts degree and had not yet entered the cryptography or computer science fields.
HBO 纪录片表明,托德采用中本聪的笔名,是为了在比特币诞生之初赋予其必要的可信度。然而,这种说法值得怀疑,因为 2008 年 BTC 白皮书发布时,托德正在完成美术学位,尚未进入密码学或计算机科学领域。
His involvement in Bitcoin did not begin until 2012, four years after its creation. There is no documented evidence of Todd participating in cryptographic discussions or projects prior to this period, making the assertion that he needed a pseudonym to be taken seriously implausible.
他直到 2012 年才开始涉足比特币,即比特币创建四年后。没有任何书面证据表明托德在此期间之前参与过密码学讨论或项目,这使得他需要化名才能被认真对待的说法令人难以置信。
#2 A 2010 BitcoinTalk Post
#2 2010 年 BitcoinTalk 帖子
A significant piece of evidence presented is a 2010 post on the BitcoinTalk forum, allegedly made from Todd's account, which HBO interprets as Todd mistakenly posting as himself instead of under the Satoshi alias. Critics point out that the post in question appeared 13 hours after a message from Satoshi, diminishing the likelihood of it being an accidental account mix-up.
提供的一个重要证据是 2010 年 BitcoinTalk 论坛上的一篇帖子,据称是由托德的帐户发布的,HBO 将其解释为托德错误地以他自己的身份而不是中本聪的别名发帖。批评者指出,该帖子是在中本聪发出消息 13 小时后出现的,这降低了帐户意外混淆的可能性。
Furthermore, the content of the post does not exhibit any continuation of thought or style that would suggest it was inadvertently made by Satoshi while logged into Todd's account. Instead, it appears as a standard interaction within the forum, consistent with the practices of users at the time.
此外,该帖子的内容没有表现出任何思想或风格的延续,表明它是中本聪在登录托德账户时无意中制作的。相反,它显示为论坛内的标准交互,与当时用户的做法一致。
#3 Replace-By-Fee Proposal As Pre-Planned
#3 预先计划的费用替代提案
The documentary posits that Todd's introduction of the RBF protocol in 2014 was premeditated and linked to Satoshi's earlier work, insinuating that this was part of a long-term plan laid out by BTC's creator.
纪录片认为托德在 2014 年引入 RBF 协议是有预谋的,并与中本聪早期的工作有关,暗示这是 BTC 创造者制定的长期计划的一部分。
Industry experts refute this, noting that RBF was one of many enhancements proposed to address Bitcoin's scalability and transaction malleability issues, emerging from ongoing community discussions and research. There is no concrete evidence to suggest that RBF was envisioned during BTC's initial development or that it serves as a hidden signature of Satoshi's identity within Todd's later contributions.
行业专家反驳了这一点,并指出 RBF 是为解决比特币可扩展性和交易延展性问题而提出的众多增强功能之一,这些增强功能是从持续的社区讨论和研究中产生的。没有具体证据表明 RBF 是在 BTC 最初开发过程中设想的,或者它是托德后来的贡献中中本聪身份的隐藏签名。
#4 Cryptic Message About Sacrificing Bitcoins
#4 关于牺牲比特币的隐秘信息
HBO highlights a message where Todd speaks about being an expert in “sacrificing coins,” interpreting it as an admission of destroying access to Satoshi's estimated 1.1 million BTC holdings. This interpretation is widely criticized as a misrepresentation.
HBO 强调了托德谈到自己是“牺牲代币”专家的信息,将其解读为承认破坏了中本聪持有的约 110 万比特币的使用权。这种解释被广泛批评为歪曲事实。
The context of Todd's statement pertains to demonstrating blockchain integrity and experimenting with coin destruction to test network responses, a practice not uncommon among developers exploring the limits and functionalities of blockchain technology. The leap to conclude that this indicates he eliminated access to a massive fortune lacks substantiation.
托德声明的背景涉及展示区块链完整性并尝试销毁硬币来测试网络响应,这种做法在探索区块链技术的局限性和功能的开发人员中并不罕见。断言这表明他消除了获得巨额财富的机会的仓促结论缺乏证据。
Several experts from the BTC community have expressed skepticism and disapproval of the documentary's conclusions. Pix (@PixOnChain), an advisor to Mintify and researcher at Jirasan, dissected HBO's claims point by point on X (formerly Twitter).
来自BTC社区的几位专家对纪录片的结论表示怀疑和不赞同。 Mintify 的顾问兼 Jirasan 的研究员 Pix (@PixOnChain) 在 X(以前的 Twitter)上逐条剖析了 HBO 的主张。
Another popular X account, Pledditor (@Pledditor), highlights the irony in the documentary's narrative, which initially suggests that revealing Satoshi's identity could endanger his safety, only to proceed with accusing Todd without definitive proof. “That was one of the least compelling Satoshi Nakamoto identities I've ever seen,” Pledditor writes. He pointed out that the strongest piece of evidence—the supposed continuation of Satoshi's thoughts by Todd on the forum—was not compelling and appeared to be Todd correcting Satoshi, a common practice in technical discussions.
另一个受欢迎的 X 账户 Pledditor (@Pledditor) 强调了纪录片叙述中的讽刺意味,该纪录片最初暗示透露中本聪的身份可能会危及他的安全,结果却在没有确凿证据的情况下继续指控托德。 “这是我见过的最不引人注目的中本聪身份之一,”普莱迪托写道。他指出,最有力的证据——托德在论坛上对中本聪思想的延续——并不令人信服,而且似乎是托德纠正中本聪,这是技术讨论中的常见做法。
Peter Todd himself responded to the documentary's allegations, where he appeared unperturbed and somewhat amused by the claims. He remarked, “This is going to be very funny when you put this into the documentary and a bunch of bitcoiners watch it.”
彼得·托德本人对纪录片的指控做出了回应,他显得泰然自若,甚至对这些指控感到有些好笑。他说:“当你把这个放进纪录片中,让一群比特币爱好者观看时,这会非常有趣。”
At press time, BTC trades at $62,424.
截至发稿时,BTC 交易价格为 62,424 美元。
免责声明:info@kdj.com
所提供的信息并非交易建议。根据本文提供的信息进行的任何投资,kdj.com不承担任何责任。加密货币具有高波动性,强烈建议您深入研究后,谨慎投资!
如您认为本网站上使用的内容侵犯了您的版权,请立即联系我们(info@kdj.com),我们将及时删除。