FOCAI (AI) 代币发行引发内幕交易和代码分叉担忧，市值下跌 35% 至 3270 万美元

根据 CoinTelegraph 报道的链上数据和社交媒体评论，该项目（称为 FOCAI）在启动后几分钟内就达到了 5000 万美元的市值，但此后由于对交易行为和代币基本完整性的担忧，其价格和估值有所下降。

A new Solana-based token, FOCAI, has drawn attention for its rapid market capitalization growth and subsequent decline amid allegations of insider trading practices. According to on-chain data, 15 wallets, suspected to belong to insiders, collectively spent 67.16 SOL (around $14,600 at the time) to purchase 605 million FOCAI tokens (roughly 60.5% of the total supply) from Raydium, a decentralized exchange on Solana. These tokens were then sold for 94,175 SOL, netting the suspected insiders a profit of approximately $20.48 million, based on market prices at the time of the trades.

一种基于 Solana 的新代币 FOCAI 因其市值快速增长以及随后因内幕交易行为指控而下跌而引起关注。根据链上数据，疑似内部人员的 15 个钱包总共花费了 67.16 SOL（当时约合 14,600 美元）从 Solana 上的去中心化交易所 Raydium 购买了 6.05 亿个 FOCAI 代币（约占总供应量的 60.5%） 。这些代币随后以 94,175 SOL 的价格出售，根据交易时的市场价格，疑似内部人士净获利约 2048 万美元。

However, further analysis revealed that these large acquisitions were not made by ordinary buyers but by members of the FOCAI team themselves, who used multiple wallets to acquire the tokens. This revelation sparked backlash in the crypto community on X, with some highlighting the massive gains made by a single address, which reportedly turned an investment of roughly $1,168 into $3.47 million in three hours, as highlighted by one widely circulated post.

但进一步分析发现，这些大额收购并不是普通买家进行的，而是FOCAI团队成员自己进行的，他们使用多个钱包来获取代币。这一消息在 X 上的加密货币社区中引发了强烈反对，一些人强调了单个地址所获得的巨大收益，据报道，正如一篇广泛流传的帖子所强调的那样，该地址在三个小时内将大约 1,168 美元的投资变成了 347 万美元。

As the news spread, it also raised concerns about the project's legitimacy. One crypto analyst on X labeled FOCAI a potential scam, pointing to the codebase being largely copied from an existing token called Eliza with minimal modification or addition of genuine blockchain functionality. The analysis further alleges that despite heavy use of terms like "AI" and "blockchain" in FOCAI's marketing, there appears to be little technical evidence to support those claims. Additionally, the analysis notes that the project's documentation is inconsistent or incomplete across different languages, and there are missing token economics and unclear smart contract implementations.

随着消息传开，也引发了对该项目合法性的担忧。 X 上的一位加密货币分析师将 FOCAI 标记为潜在的骗局，指出其代码库大部分是从名为 Eliza 的现有代币复制而来，只进行了极少的修改或添加了真正的区块链功能。分析进一步指出，尽管FOCAI的营销中大量使用“人工智能”和“区块链”等术语，但似乎没有什么技术证据来支持这些说法。此外，分析指出，该项目的文档在不同语言中不一致或不完整，并且缺少代币经济学和不明确的智能合约实施。

These findings echo warnings from other observers, who have noted that the code is heavily forked, lacks key security measures, and shows little sign of a truly decentralized architecture. The discovery of an apparent insider strategy for acquiring and later selling the majority of FOCAI tokens has further fueled doubts about the project's transparency and raised questions about how decentralized or fair the token's launch actually was.

这些发现呼应了其他观察者的警告，他们指出代码存在严重分叉，缺乏关键的安全措施，并且几乎没有显示出真正去中心化架构的迹象。收购并随后出售大部分 FOCAI 代币的明显内部策略的发现进一步加剧了对该项目透明度的怀疑，并引发了对该代币发行实际上的去中心化或公平性的质疑。

Meanwhile, market data from Pump.fun suggests that most traders who participated in FOCAI did not profit significantly, highlighting the skewed nature of such maneuvers.

与此同时，Pump.fun 的市场数据显示，大多数参与 FOCAI 的交易者并未大幅获利，凸显了此类操作的扭曲性质。