FOCAI (AI) 代幣發行引發內線交易和代碼分叉擔憂，市值下跌 35% 至 3,270 萬美元

根據CoinTelegraph 報導的鏈上數據和社交媒體評論，該項目（稱為FOCAI）在啟動後幾分鐘內就達到了5000 萬美元的市值，但此後由於對交易行為和代幣基本完整性的擔憂，其價格和估值有所下降。

A new Solana-based token, FOCAI, has drawn attention for its rapid market capitalization growth and subsequent decline amid allegations of insider trading practices. According to on-chain data, 15 wallets, suspected to belong to insiders, collectively spent 67.16 SOL (around $14,600 at the time) to purchase 605 million FOCAI tokens (roughly 60.5% of the total supply) from Raydium, a decentralized exchange on Solana. These tokens were then sold for 94,175 SOL, netting the suspected insiders a profit of approximately $20.48 million, based on market prices at the time of the trades.

一種基於 Solana 的新代幣 FOCAI 因其市值快速增長以及隨後因內線交易行為指控而下跌而引起關注。根據鏈上數據，疑似內部人員的15 個錢包總共花費了67.16 SOL（當時約14,600 美元）從Solana 上的去中心化交易所Raydium 購買了6.05 億個FOCAI 代幣（約佔總供應量的60.5 %） 。這些代幣隨後以 94,175 SOL 的價格出售，根據交易時的市場價格，疑似內部人士淨獲利約 2,048 萬美元。

However, further analysis revealed that these large acquisitions were not made by ordinary buyers but by members of the FOCAI team themselves, who used multiple wallets to acquire the tokens. This revelation sparked backlash in the crypto community on X, with some highlighting the massive gains made by a single address, which reportedly turned an investment of roughly $1,168 into $3.47 million in three hours, as highlighted by one widely circulated post.

但進一步分析發現，這些大額收購並不是一般買家進行的，而是FOCAI團隊成員自己進行的，他們使用多個錢包來取得代幣。這一消息在X 上的加密貨幣社區中引發了強烈反對，一些人強調了單個地址所獲得的巨大收益，據報道，正如一篇廣泛流傳的帖子所強調的那樣，該地址在三個小時內將大約1,168 美元的投資變成了347 萬美元。

As the news spread, it also raised concerns about the project's legitimacy. One crypto analyst on X labeled FOCAI a potential scam, pointing to the codebase being largely copied from an existing token called Eliza with minimal modification or addition of genuine blockchain functionality. The analysis further alleges that despite heavy use of terms like "AI" and "blockchain" in FOCAI's marketing, there appears to be little technical evidence to support those claims. Additionally, the analysis notes that the project's documentation is inconsistent or incomplete across different languages, and there are missing token economics and unclear smart contract implementations.

隨著消息傳開，也引發了對該計畫合法性的擔憂。 X 上的一位加密貨幣分析師將FOCAI 標記為潛在的騙局，指出其代碼庫大部分是從名為Eliza 的現有代幣複製而來，只進行了極少的修改或添加了真正的區塊鏈功能。分析進一步指出，儘管FOCAI的營銷中大量使用「人工智慧」和「區塊鏈」等術語，但似乎沒有任何技術證據來支持這些說法。此外，分析指出，該專案的文檔在不同語言中不一致或不完整，並且缺乏代幣經濟學和不明確的智能合約實施。

These findings echo warnings from other observers, who have noted that the code is heavily forked, lacks key security measures, and shows little sign of a truly decentralized architecture. The discovery of an apparent insider strategy for acquiring and later selling the majority of FOCAI tokens has further fueled doubts about the project's transparency and raised questions about how decentralized or fair the token's launch actually was.

這些發現呼應了其他觀察者的警告，他們指出程式碼存在嚴重分叉，缺乏關鍵的安全措施，並且幾乎沒有顯示出真正去中心化架構的跡象。收購並隨後出售大部分 FOCAI 代幣的明顯內部策略的發現進一步加劇了對該項目透明度的懷疑，並引發了對該代幣發行實際上的去中心化或公平性的質疑。

Meanwhile, market data from Pump.fun suggests that most traders who participated in FOCAI did not profit significantly, highlighting the skewed nature of such maneuvers.

同時，Pump.fun 的市場數據顯示，大多數參與 FOCAI 的交易者並未大幅獲利，凸顯了此類操作的扭曲性質。