Consensys 就以太坊的安全分类起诉 SEC

加密货币公司 Consensys 已对 SEC 提起诉讼，质疑其将以太坊原生代币 Ether 归类为非证券。该诉讼认为，以太币在以太坊网络中作为实用代币的主要用途不符合豪伊测试下投资合同的标准，并且将其视为证券会破坏网络的功能。此案发生在美国证券交易委员会对加密货币行业采取积极执法行动之际，并且可能对以太坊和更广泛的加密货币市场产生更广泛的影响，具体取决于法律斗争的结果。

Consensys Initiates Legal Challenge Against SEC Over Ethereum's Classification as a Security

Consensys 就以太坊被归类为证券向 SEC 发起法律挑战

Washington, D.C., March 8, 2023 - In a significant legal challenge that could shape the regulatory landscape for cryptocurrencies, Consensys, a leading blockchain technology firm, has filed a lawsuit against the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The lawsuit centers on the SEC's classification of Ethereum's native token, Ether, as a non-security.

华盛顿特区，2023 年 3 月 8 日 - 在一项可能影响加密货币监管格局的重大法律挑战中，领先的区块链技术公司 Consensys 已对美国证券交易委员会 (SEC) 提起诉讼。该诉讼的重点是美国证券交易委员会将以太坊的原生代币 Ether 归类为非证券。

Consensys' complaint, filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, argues that the SEC's actions against Ether are not only illegal but also pose a serious threat to the broader blockchain ecosystem. The company contends that if Ether were to be considered a security, this would seriously disrupt the functionality of the Ethereum network in the United States, potentially blocking one of the most significant technological innovations on the internet.

Consensys 向美国德克萨斯州南区地方法院提起的诉讼称，SEC 针对 ETH 的行动不仅非法，而且对更广泛的区块链生态系统构成严重威胁。该公司认为，如果以太币被视为一种证券，这将严重扰乱美国以太坊网络的功能，可能会阻碍互联网上最重要的技术创新之一。

This classification would impose traditional security law on every transaction involving Ether, leading to a chilling effect on its use. Consensys asserts that Ether primarily acts as a utility token within the Ethereum network, facilitating operations and activities of developers, and does not meet the criteria of an investment contract under the "Howey Test" traditionally used by the SEC to determine whether an asset constitutes a security.

这种分类将对涉及以太币的每笔交易实施传统的安全法，从而对其使用产生寒蝉效应。 Consensys 声称，以太币主要充当以太坊网络内的实用代币，促进开发者的运营和活动，并且不符合 SEC 传统上用于确定资产是否构成资产的“Howey 测试”下的投资合同标准。安全。

"The SEC's actions against Ether are misguided and threaten to stifle innovation in the blockchain industry," said Joseph Lubin, CEO of Consensys. "Ether is not a security, and we are confident that the court will recognize this fact."

Consensys 首席执行官约瑟夫·卢宾 (Joseph Lubin) 表示：“美国证券交易委员会针对以太币的行动是误导性的，并有可能扼杀区块链行业的创新。” “以太币不是证券，我们相信法院会承认这一事实。”

The lawsuit comes at a critical time for Consensys, a key supporter of the Ethereum blockchain, as they seek to defend against a potential SEC lawsuit regarding their management of the MetaMask wallet. In early April, Consensys received a Wells notice from the SEC indicating that the agency may soon pursue legal action against the company, alleging that MetaMask has been operated as an unauthorized broker-dealer.

对于以太坊区块链的主要支持者 Consensys 来说，这起诉讼正值关键时刻，因为他们试图针对 SEC 可能就其 MetaMask 钱包管理问题提起的诉讼进行辩护。 4 月初，Consensys 收到 SEC 发出的 Wells 通知，表明该机构可能很快对该公司采取法律行动，指控 MetaMask 已作为未经授权的经纪自营商运营。

The lawsuit also marks a crucial moment in the ongoing battle between the SEC and the cryptocurrency industry, which has intensified under the leadership of SEC Chairman Gary Gensler. Under Gensler's leadership, the SEC has launched an aggressive enforcement campaign that includes issuing numerous subpoenas to entities involved with the Ethereum blockchain. These actions have sparked strong criticism from the crypto community, which sees these measures as invasive and excessive.

该诉讼也标志着 SEC 与加密货币行业之间持续斗争的关键时刻，这场斗争在 SEC 主席加里·詹斯勒 (Gary Gensler) 的领导下愈演愈烈。在 Gensler 的领导下，美国证券交易委员会发起了一场积极的执法行动，其中包括向涉及以太坊区块链的实体发出大量传票。这些行为引发了加密社区的强烈批评，他们认为这些措施具有侵略性和过度性。

The outcome of this case could have widespread implications not only for Ethereum but also for the entire cryptocurrency industry. A ruling in favor of Consensys could validate the argument that decentralized blockchain tokens do not automatically qualify as securities, thus providing a clearer regulatory framework for the industry. On the contrary, a decision in favor of the SEC could lead to greater regulatory control and possibly stricter controls on similar cryptocurrencies.

此案的结果不仅可能对以太坊而且对整个加密货币行业产生广泛影响。有利于 Consensys 的裁决可以验证去中心化区块链代币不会自动符合证券资格的论点，从而为该行业提供更清晰的监管框架。相反，有利于 SEC 的决定可能会导致更大的监管控制，并可能对类似的加密货币进行更严格的控制。

As the case progresses, it is expected to attract significant attention from regulators, investors, and legal experts eager to understand the evolving landscape of cryptocurrency regulation. The outcome of this case could establish a precedent that strengthens the crypto industry's fight for autonomy from traditional securities laws or reinforces the SEC's authority over new digital assets. As the court deliberates, the future of Ethereum and perhaps the broader structure of blockchain technology hangs in the balance.

随着案件的进展，预计将引起监管机构、投资者和法律专家的高度关注，他们渴望了解加密货币监管不断变化的格局。此案的结果可能会树立一个先例，加强加密货币行业争取传统证券法自治权的斗争，或加强 SEC 对新数字资产的权威。随着法院的审议，以太坊的未来以及区块链技术的更广泛结构仍悬而未决。