国会欢迎SC关于WAQF（修正案）法案的初步观察

工会政府向最高法院保证它将不会执行《 WAQF（修正案）法》的关键规定

Hours after the Union government gave assurance to the Supreme Court that it will not implement key provisions of the Waqf (Amendment) Act till the next hearing, the Congress on Thursday welcomed the top court’s preliminary observations, saying they have opened the space for a broader and necessary debate on the legitimate concerns surrounding “this hastily enacted legislation”.

工会政府向最高法院保证，直到下一次听证会直到下一次听证会，它将不会实施《 WAQF（修正案）法案》的关键规定，国会周四欢迎最高法院的初步观察，称他们为“这一急速纳税立法”的合法问题为更广泛而必要的辩论打开了空间。

Congress leader Abhishek Singhvi, who addressed a press conference along with party lawmaker Imran Pratapgarhi, said the top court has re-established the “earlier legal position” on three points of the Act.

国会领导人阿比舍克·辛格维（Abhishek Singhvi）与党议员伊姆兰·普拉塔普加里（Imran Pratapgarhi）一起在新闻发布会上讲话，他说，最高法院已重新建立了该法案三分的“较早的法律立场”。

“The principal points we made in the Supreme Court is that it is not about improving institutions but about controlling them and closing them. The government can’t amputate Article 26 (of Constitution) and call it administrative efficiency,” Singhvi, who is also a senior advocate, said.

“我们在最高法院提出的要点是，这不是要改善机构，而是要控制机构并关闭它们。政府不能截肢（宪法）第26条，并称其为行政效率，”也是高级倡导者的辛格维（Singhvi）说。

Article 26 guarantees the freedom to manage religious affairs.

第26条保证了管理宗教事务的自由。

Singhvi maintained that a Waqf board with token Muslim representation is another word for appropriation. “It is about a message that minority interests are far game for takeover. The law is against established principles of law,” the Rajya Sabha member said.

辛格维（Singhvi）坚持认为，具有象征性穆斯林代表的WAQF董事会是拨款的另一个词。 Rajya Sabha成员说：“这是一个信息，即少数群体的利益是远远无法接管的。

Claiming that the party was not defending any one community but the constitutional principle that rights provided under Article 26 cannot be sacrificed. “Today it is Waqf, tomorrow it could be your shrine your institution. No freedom is safe, no institution is sacred. The fight is not just against a law but it’s a fight against an ideology. SC has passed an interim order an important step in restoring the order,” Singhvi added.

声称该党没有捍卫任何一个社区，而是不能牺牲第26条规定的权利的宪法原则。 “今天是WAQF，明天可能是您的机构。没有自由是安全的，没有机构是神圣的。这场斗争不仅是违反法律，而且是与意识形态的斗争。SC已通过了临时命令，在恢复命令方面是重要的一步，” Singhvi补充说。

Congress general secretary KC Venugopal said the top court’s observations on the Waqf Act have brought into sharp focus the “very apprehensions” raised by the INDIA bloc parties inside and outside Parliament. “They have opened the space for a broader and necessary debate on the legitimate concerns surrounding this hastily enacted legislation — concerns that were neither adequately addressed during the JPC deliberations nor after the day-long discussion in Parliament,” Venugopal said in a post on X.

国会秘书长KC Venugopal表示，最高法院对《 WAQF法》的观察已引起了印度集团内部和国会外部的“非常担心”的重点。 Venugopal在X上的一篇文章中说：“他们为围绕这项急速制定的立法的合法问题开辟了一个更广泛而必要的辩论的空间，这在JPC审议期间既没有充分解决的问题，也没有在议会进行了为期一天的讨论之后。”

“The Court’s pointed remarks raise serious constitutional questions about the Act’s infringement on fundamental rights and lay bare its divisive undercurrents. The fight to defend the idea of India — inclusive, plural, and just — will continue, in the courts and with the people,” he added.

他补充说：“法院的尖锐言论提出了有关该法案侵犯基本权利的严重宪法问题，并揭露了其分裂性的暗流。捍卫印度思想的斗争 - 包容性，复数和正当的斗争 - 将继续在法院和人民中继续存在。”