查尔斯·霍斯金森（Charles Hoskinson）爆炸了美国国际开发署（USAID

这场争议引发了加密货币社区及以后的广泛辩论，因为许多人都质疑政府机构在塑造公众关于数字资产的叙述中的作用。

Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson has strongly criticized the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) for allegedly financing a book that portrays Bitcoin as being linked to right-wing extremism. The controversy has ignited widespread debate in the cryptocurrency community and beyond, as many question the role of government agencies in shaping public narratives about digital assets.

Cardano的创始人查尔斯·霍斯金森（Charles Hoskinson）强烈批评美国国际发展机构（USAID）据称为一本书的书提供了与右翼极端主义有关的书籍。这场争议引发了加密货币社区及以后的广泛辩论，因为许多人都质疑政府机构在塑造公众关于数字资产的叙述中的作用。

Hoskinson took to social media to express his frustration over the issue. On X (formerly known as Twitter), he wrote, “So apparently, USAID is funding the production of propaganda that says Bitcoin is right-wing extremism. I’m so done with this garbage.” His remarks highlight his deep concerns regarding how Bitcoin and blockchain technology are being framed in public discourse, particularly by government-backed initiatives.

霍斯金森（Hoskinson）上了社交媒体，表达了他对这个问题的沮丧。在X（以前称为Twitter）上，他写道：“显然，美国国际开发署正在资助宣传的生产，说比特币是右翼极端主义。我对此垃圾做得很好。”他的讲话强调了他对比特币和区块链技术在公共话语中如何构建的深刻关注，尤其是政府支持的计划。

The book at the center of this controversy is titled “Cyberlibertarianism: The Right-Wing Politics of Digital Technology,” authored by David Golumbia. The book argues that Bitcoin and similar digital technologies have ideological connections to right-wing extremism and cyberlibertarianism, suggesting that these innovations are being used to undermine state control and traditional financial institutions.

大卫·戈伦比亚（David Golumbia）撰写的这一争议中心的这本书的标题为“网络自由主义：数字技术的右翼政治”。该书认为，比特币和类似的数字技术与右翼极端主义和网络自由主义具有意识形态联系，这表明这些创新已用于破坏国家控制和传统金融机构。

Golumbia, an academic and critic of decentralized technologies, has also written another book titled “The Politics of Bitcoin: Software as Right-Wing Extremism,” in which he presents a similar argument. These works have been adopted into university curricula, including those at institutions such as Duke University and the University of Southern California.

Golumbia是分散技术的学术和批评者，还写了另一本书，名为“比特币的政治：软件为右翼极端主义”，其中他提出了类似的论点。这些作品已被采用到大学课程中，包括杜克大学和南加州大学等机构的课程。

Reports indicate that Golumbia received approximately $80,000 in government grants, allegedly from USAID, to support his research and publication. This revelation has triggered concerns about the motivations behind funding such work and the potential for government agencies to influence narratives about cryptocurrency in an unfavorable manner.

报告表明，戈伦比亚获得了约80,000美元的政府赠款，据称来自美国国际开发署，以支持他的研究和出版。这种启示引发了人们对资金资金背后的动机以及政府机构以不利方式影响有关加密货币叙事的潜力的担忧。

Hoskinson’s criticism reflects broader sentiments within the cryptocurrency industry, where many believe that Bitcoin and blockchain technology are politically neutral tools designed for financial inclusion and decentralization. Critics argue that labeling Bitcoin as an instrument of right-wing extremism is misleading and ignores the diverse range of individuals and organizations that use it.

霍斯金森的批评反映了加密货币行业中更广泛的情感，在那里，许多人认为比特币和区块链技术是政治上立的工具，旨在为金融包容和分散化。评论家认为，将比特币标记为右翼极端主义的工具具有误导性，而忽略了使用它的个人和组织的各种范围。

Bitcoin has been adopted by people across various political and ideological backgrounds, from activists in authoritarian regimes to financial institutions looking for alternative assets. To many in the crypto space, the suggestion that Bitcoin has inherent political biases contradicts its fundamental principles of decentralization and permissionless access.

从专制政权的激进主义者到寻求替代资产的金融机构，比特币已被各种政治和意识形态背景的人们采用。对于加密货币领域的许多人来说，比特币具有固有的政治偏见的建议与其权力下放和无许可获得的基本原则相矛盾。

This incident raises critical questions about the role of government agencies like USAID in funding research that could carry ideological biases. While USAID is primarily known for its work in international development and humanitarian aid, allegations that it is financing research projects that portray Bitcoin in a negative light suggest a potential overreach into political and economic discourse.

这一事件提出了有关美国国际开发署这样的政府机构在可能带来意识形态偏见的资金研究中的作用的关键问题。尽管美国国际开发署主要以其在国际发展和人道主义援助方面的工作而闻名，但指控它正在为研究项目提供资金，这些研究项目的负面看法表明，潜在地涉及到政治和经济论述。

The broader concern is whether government-funded research is being used to shape public perception about digital assets in a way that serves particular political or economic interests. Some experts argue that this kind of funding could be an attempt to discredit cryptocurrencies, which pose a challenge to traditional financial systems and state-controlled monetary policies.

更广泛的关注点是，政府资助的研究是否被用于以一种具有特定政治或经济利益的方式来塑造对数字资产的看法。一些专家认为，这种资金可能是一种试图抹黑加密货币的尝试，这对传统的金融系统和国家控制的货币政策构成了挑战。

As Bitcoin and blockchain technology continue to gain mainstream adoption, discussions surrounding their role in society will likely become even more polarized. Governments, regulatory bodies, and institutions may continue to attempt to influence public opinion through research and policy measures.

随着比特币和区块链技术继续获得主流采用，围绕其在社会中作用的讨论可能会变得更加两极化。政府，监管机构和机构可能会继续尝试通过研究和政策措施来影响公众舆论。

The controversy surrounding USAID’s alleged funding of Golumbia’s book underscores the growing tension between decentralized financial technologies and traditional power structures. While Bitcoin advocates emphasize the technology’s potential for financial empowerment and censorship resistance, critics argue that it could be exploited for illicit activities or used to challenge state authority.

围绕美国国际开发署（USAID）涉嫌资助Golumbia的书的争议强调了分散的金融技术与传统电力结构之间日益增长的紧张关系。尽管比特币的拥护者强调了该技术获得财务授权和审查制度抵抗的潜力，但批评家认为，它可以被利用用于非法活动或用于挑战国家权威。