查爾斯·霍斯金森（Charles Hoskinson）爆炸了美國國際開發署（USAID

這場爭議引發了加密貨幣社區及以後的廣泛辯論，因為許多人都質疑政府機構在塑造公眾關於數字資產的敘述中的作用。

Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson has strongly criticized the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) for allegedly financing a book that portrays Bitcoin as being linked to right-wing extremism. The controversy has ignited widespread debate in the cryptocurrency community and beyond, as many question the role of government agencies in shaping public narratives about digital assets.

Cardano的創始人查爾斯·霍斯金森（Charles Hoskinson）強烈批評美國國際發展機構（USAID）據稱為一本書的書提供了與右翼極端主義有關的書籍。這場爭議引發了加密貨幣社區及以後的廣泛辯論，因為許多人都質疑政府機構在塑造公眾關於數字資產的敘述中的作用。

Hoskinson took to social media to express his frustration over the issue. On X (formerly known as Twitter), he wrote, “So apparently, USAID is funding the production of propaganda that says Bitcoin is right-wing extremism. I’m so done with this garbage.” His remarks highlight his deep concerns regarding how Bitcoin and blockchain technology are being framed in public discourse, particularly by government-backed initiatives.

霍斯金森（Hoskinson）上了社交媒體，表達了他對這個問題的沮喪。在X（以前稱為Twitter）上，他寫道：“顯然，美國國際開發署正在資助宣傳的生產，說比特幣是右翼極端主義。我對此垃圾做得很好。”他的講話強調了他對比特幣和區塊鏈技術在公共話語中如何構建的深刻關注，尤其是政府支持的計劃。

The book at the center of this controversy is titled “Cyberlibertarianism: The Right-Wing Politics of Digital Technology,” authored by David Golumbia. The book argues that Bitcoin and similar digital technologies have ideological connections to right-wing extremism and cyberlibertarianism, suggesting that these innovations are being used to undermine state control and traditional financial institutions.

大衛·戈倫比亞（David Golumbia）撰寫的這一爭議中心的這本書的標題為“網絡自由主義：數字技術的右翼政治”。該書認為，比特幣和類似的數字技術與右翼極端主義和網絡自由主義具有意識形態聯繫，這表明這些創新已用於破壞國家控制和傳統金融機構。

Golumbia, an academic and critic of decentralized technologies, has also written another book titled “The Politics of Bitcoin: Software as Right-Wing Extremism,” in which he presents a similar argument. These works have been adopted into university curricula, including those at institutions such as Duke University and the University of Southern California.

Golumbia是分散技術的學術和批評者，還寫了另一本書，名為“比特幣的政治：軟件為右翼極端主義”，其中他提出了類似的論點。這些作品已被採用到大學課程中，包括杜克大學和南加州大學等機構的課程。

Reports indicate that Golumbia received approximately $80,000 in government grants, allegedly from USAID, to support his research and publication. This revelation has triggered concerns about the motivations behind funding such work and the potential for government agencies to influence narratives about cryptocurrency in an unfavorable manner.

報告表明，戈倫比亞獲得了約80,000美元的政府贈款，據稱來自美國國際開發署，以支持他的研究和出版。這種啟示引發了人們對資金資金背後的動機以及政府機構以不利方式影響有關加密貨幣敘事的潛力的擔憂。

Hoskinson’s criticism reflects broader sentiments within the cryptocurrency industry, where many believe that Bitcoin and blockchain technology are politically neutral tools designed for financial inclusion and decentralization. Critics argue that labeling Bitcoin as an instrument of right-wing extremism is misleading and ignores the diverse range of individuals and organizations that use it.

霍斯金森的批評反映了加密貨幣行業中更廣泛的情感，在那裡，許多人認為比特幣和區塊鏈技術是政治上立的工具，旨在為金融包容和分散化。評論家認為，將比特幣標記為右翼極端主義的工具具有誤導性，而忽略了使用它的個人和組織的各種範圍。

Bitcoin has been adopted by people across various political and ideological backgrounds, from activists in authoritarian regimes to financial institutions looking for alternative assets. To many in the crypto space, the suggestion that Bitcoin has inherent political biases contradicts its fundamental principles of decentralization and permissionless access.

從專制政權的激進主義者到尋求替代資產的金融機構，比特幣已被各種政治和意識形態背景的人們採用。對於加密貨幣領域的許多人來說，比特幣具有固有的政治偏見的建議與其權力下放和無許可獲得的基本原則相矛盾。

This incident raises critical questions about the role of government agencies like USAID in funding research that could carry ideological biases. While USAID is primarily known for its work in international development and humanitarian aid, allegations that it is financing research projects that portray Bitcoin in a negative light suggest a potential overreach into political and economic discourse.

這一事件提出了有關美國國際開發署這樣的政府機構在可能帶來意識形態偏見的資金研究中的作用的關鍵問題。儘管美國國際開發署主要以其在國際發展和人道主義援助方面的工作而聞名，但指控它正在為研究項目提供資金，這些研究項目的負面看法表明，潛在地涉及到政治和經濟論述。

The broader concern is whether government-funded research is being used to shape public perception about digital assets in a way that serves particular political or economic interests. Some experts argue that this kind of funding could be an attempt to discredit cryptocurrencies, which pose a challenge to traditional financial systems and state-controlled monetary policies.

更廣泛的關注點是，政府資助的研究是否被用於以一種具有特定政治或經濟利益的方式來塑造對數字資產的看法。一些專家認為，這種資金可能是一種試圖抹黑加密貨幣的嘗試，這對傳統的金融系統和國家控制的貨幣政策構成了挑戰。

As Bitcoin and blockchain technology continue to gain mainstream adoption, discussions surrounding their role in society will likely become even more polarized. Governments, regulatory bodies, and institutions may continue to attempt to influence public opinion through research and policy measures.

隨著比特幣和區塊鏈技術繼續獲得主流採用，圍繞其在社會中作用的討論可能會變得更加兩極化。政府，監管機構和機構可能會繼續嘗試通過研究和政策措施來影響公眾輿論。

The controversy surrounding USAID’s alleged funding of Golumbia’s book underscores the growing tension between decentralized financial technologies and traditional power structures. While Bitcoin advocates emphasize the technology’s potential for financial empowerment and censorship resistance, critics argue that it could be exploited for illicit activities or used to challenge state authority.

圍繞美國國際開發署（USAID）涉嫌資助Golumbia的書的爭議強調了分散的金融技術與傳統電力結構之間日益增長的緊張關係。儘管比特幣的擁護者強調了該技術獲得財務授權和審查制度抵抗的潛力，但批評家認為，它可以被利用用於非法活動或用於挑戰國家權威。