Bybit Hack：以太坊会回滚区块链以帮助交换吗？

Bitmex联合创始人Arthur Hayes建议以太坊在Bybit Hack之后，基本上取消了被盗资金。

BitMEX co-founder Arthur Hayes has suggested that Ethereum should roll back, essentially cancelling out the stolen funds, in the aftermath of the Bybit hack. He points out that Ethereum did a similar action back in 2016 when a hard fork was created to counteract a major security breach. Such a rollback after the Bybit breach would seem reasonable, given that the amount of stolen funds is the largest in crypto history.

Bitmex的联合创始人Arthur Hayes建议以太坊应在Bybit Hack之后退缩，从本质上取消了被盗的资金。他指出，以太坊在2016年做出了类似的行动，当时创建了一个硬叉来抵消重大安全漏洞。鉴于被盗资金的数量是加密历史上最大的，这种回滚似乎是合理的。

In what has been described as a black swan event, Bybit lost around $1.4 billion worth of Ethereum on Friday. Although all the details are yet to emerge, online investigator ZachXBT claimed that the wallets used in the attack are connected to wallets used by North Korea’s hacking group Lazarus.

在被描述为黑天鹅事件的情况下，拜比特在周五损失了价值约14亿美元的以太坊。尽管所有细节尚未出现，但在线调查员Zachxbt声称袭击中使用的钱包与朝鲜黑客黑客组织Lazarus使用的钱包有关。

Arthur Hayes, an Ethereum holder, has asked Vitalik Buterin on X whether a rollback would be possible to help out the Bybit exchange. Ben Zhou, Bybit CEO, has also reached out to Buterin and asked whether there is anything that the Ethereum Foundation can do to minimize the impact of the breach. Zhou concedes that any actions would have to be asked of the Ethereum community so that they can approve of any changes.

以太坊持有人亚瑟·海斯（Arthur Hayes）在X上问Vitalik Buterin，是否有可能回滚来帮助Bybit Exchange。 Bybit首席执行官Ben Zhou还与Buterin联系，并询问以太坊基金会是否可以将违规的影响最小化。周承认，必须对以太坊社区提出任何行动，以便他们可以批准任何变化。

Zhou was asked on February 22, at an online event, whether he supported an Ethereum rollback. He replied:

2月22日，在一场在线活动中要求周，他是否支持以太坊回滚。他回答：

“I’m not sure if it’s one man’s decision. Based on the spirit of blockchain, maybe it should be a voting process to see what the communities want, but I am not sure.”

“我不确定这是一个人的决定。基于区块链的精神，也许这应该是一个投票过程，可以看到社区想要什么，但我不确定。”

The 2016 DAO attack stole around $60 million worth of Ethereum. This prompted the hard fork, which essentially rolled back the blockchain.

2016年DAO攻击偷走了价值约6000万美元的以太坊。这促使硬叉基本上滚回区块链。

Many Ethereum developers are against the rollback option because it violates the principles of decentralization and immutability. If Buterin decides to rollback Ethereum without involvement from other developers or community members, that may be seen as a change in underlying principles.

许多以太坊开发人员反对回滚选项，因为它违反了权力下放和不变性的原则。如果Buterin决定在没有其他开发商或社区成员参与的情况下回滚以太坊，那可能被视为基本原则的变化。

However, Ethereum may need leadership now more than ever and less reliance on consensus. After all, part of the breakdown with Bitcoin happened as a result of an overfocus on consensus and less focus on leadership. As the saying goes, too many cooks spoil the broth. Further, Buterin has indicated a shift in policy by refusing to break his moral code regarding online casinos, even if there is widespread support for crypto gambling.

但是，以太坊现在可能比以往任何时候都更需要领导才能，并且对共识的依赖更少。毕竟，由于对共识的过度关注，而对领导力的关注较少，因此发生了比特币的部分故障。俗话说，太多的厨师会破坏肉汤。此外，巴特林（Buterin）表示，即使对加密赌博有广泛的支持，也拒绝打破有关在线赌场的道德准则，从而改变了政策。

Bitcoin advocate Jimmy Song claims the comparison between Bybit and the DAO hack is a false one, pointing out that in the event of 2016, a 30-day intervention period existed, whereas with Bybit, the hack has already been finalized.

比特币的倡导者吉米·宋（Jimmy Song）声称，拜比特（Bybit）和道德·哈克（Dao Hack）之间的比较是错误的，指出在2016年的情况下，存在30天的干预期，而与bybit相比，该黑客已经完成。

“I know people are expecting the Ethereum Foundation to roll back the chain, but I suspect it’s already too much of a mess to do it cleanly,” said Song.

宋说：“我知道人们期望以太坊基金会回滚链条，但我怀疑这已经太混乱了。”

There is still debate about the exact details of the DAO hack, specifically the percentage of funds stolen by the hackers, yet the end result is agreed on: a hard fork splitting the ETH token into Ethereum classic and Ethereum.

关于DAO Hack的确切细节，仍然存在争论，特别是黑客偷走的资金的百分比，但最终结果还是达成了共识：一个坚硬的叉子将ETH代币分为以太坊经典和以太坊。

Furthermore, the term “rollback” was not used in 2016. The developers instead referred to the event as an “irregular state transition.” The event still raises questions regarding the immutability of blockchains.

此外，2016年未使用“回滚”一词。开发人员将事件称为“不规则状态过渡”。该事件仍然引发了有关区块链不变性的问题。

Other factors that may influence the Ethereum community to embrace a rollback are the possibility of North Korea using the funds to proliferate nuclear weapons and the sheer magnitude of the hack, surpassing all of the top hacks of 2024.

可能影响以太坊社区滚滚的其他因素是朝鲜利用资金繁殖核武器和hack巨大的可能性，超过了2024年的所有顶级黑客。

Shortly after the attack, multiple transactions were made to move assets off the Bybit platform. The mETH protocol released a post-mortem report detailing the hack, revealing that mETH was used to swap stolen tokens. The mETH token is on the Ethereum network and allows users to stake their ETH tokens and receive mETH in return.

袭击发生后不久，进行了多项交易，以将资产从BYBIT平台移出。 Meth方案发布了一份验尸报告，详细介绍了该黑客攻击，表明Meth被用来交换被盗的令牌。甲基苯丙胺的代币在以太坊网络上，允许用户存放其ETH令牌并获得甲基苯丙胺作为回报。

The mETH report reveals that 8,000 mETH were swapped for ETH, and 15,000 cmETH were attempted to withdraw. However, the mETH protocol refused the withdrawal. The protocol had an 8-hour withdrawal delay, which prevented the attackers from withdrawing the token. The mETH team blacklisted the attackers’ address and placed the recovered 15,000 cmETH into a safe address.

甲基苯丙胺的报告显示，将8,000 METH换成ETH，并试图撤离15,000 CMETH。但是，甲基苯丙胺协议拒绝撤回。该协议的提款延迟为8小时，这阻止了攻击者撤回令牌。冰毒团队将攻击者的地址列入了黑名单，并将被恢复的15,000 CMETH置于安全地址。

Bybit users panicked after the attack and started withdrawing their funds. This event brought back traumatic memories of the FTX scam and left many crypto holders concerned about their tokens. Despite the magnanimity of the breach, the crypto community seems to be used to these events and is responding quickly with concrete actions.

攻击后，拜比特用户惊慌失措，开始撤回其资金。这项事件带回了FTX骗局的创伤记忆，并使许多加密货币持有人担心其令牌。尽管违规行为很大，但加密货币社区似乎已用于这些事件，并以具体的行动迅速做出了反应。