比特币Samson Mow发表了一条推文，这表明即使顶级替代币的总硬币供应与比特币相似，BTC仍然以每枚硬币的价格击败它们。

MOW表示，大多数Altcoins都利用了所谓的单位偏见，这是一种心理效应，这是由于它们的数十亿美元供应数十亿美元，有时甚至是数万亿个硬币，每枚硬币的价格似乎都比一个BTC便宜。

Bitcoiner Samson Mow published a tweet, suggesting that even if top altcoins had a total coin supply similar to that of Bitcoin, BTC would still beat them in terms of price per coin.

比特币Samson Mow发表了一条推文，这表明即使顶级替代币的总硬币供应与比特币相似，BTC仍然以每枚硬币的价格击败它们。

Mow stated that most altcoins are taking advantage of the so-called unit bias – a psychological effect which appears since due to their huge supplies of billions and sometimes even trillions on coins the price per one coin seems cheaper than that of one BTC.

MOW表示，大多数Altcoins都利用了所谓的单位偏见，这是一种心理效应，这是由于它们的数十亿美元供应数十亿美元，有时甚至是数万亿个硬币，每枚硬币的价格似乎都比一个BTC便宜。

If this bias is removed, he says, then mathematically, these altcoins should be worth several thousand of dollars each. But Mow doesn’t believe in these theoretical figures, saying that Bitcoin would still have a much higher market dominance.

他说，如果消除了这种偏见，那么这些山寨币应该每人价值几千美元。但是Mow不相信这些理论上的数字，他说比特币仍然具有更高的市场优势。

"No way XRP is worth $5,800"

“ XRP不值得$ 5,800”

Mow suggested that if this bias is removed, XRP would cost $5,800, SOL would be trading at $3,400, and ETH at $9,200. He explained that these figures can be calculated “by taking the market cap of the alts and dividing by 21 million, thus framing their supply in terms of Bitcoin supply.”

MOW建议，如果删除了这种偏见，XRP的价格为5,800美元，SOL的交易价格为3,400美元，ETH的价格为9,200美元。他解释说，可以“通过占用Alts的市值并划分2100万，从而在比特币供应方面取消供应来计算这些数字。”

For example, he shows, ETH: $193B market cap / 21M = $9,200. Most altcoins, Mow claims, take advantage of this unit bias “by utilizing a very high supply, so people can't figure out what they're buying.”

例如，他表明，ETH：$ 193B市值 / 21m = $ 9,200。 MOW声称，大多数Altcoins通过使用非常高的供应来利用该单元的偏见，因此人们无法弄清楚他们在购买什么。”

Many believe that buying one XRP for $2, for example, is much cheaper than buying Bitcoin at $85,000, he says, adding that “unit bias is absolutely destroying the uninitiated.”

他说，许多人认为，以2美元的价格购买一个XRP比以85,000美元的价格购买比特币要便宜得多。

Those numbers are calculated by taking the market cap of the alts and dividing by 21 million, thus framing their supply in terms of Bitcoin supply.

这些数字是通过将Alts的市值划分并除以2100万而计算得出的，从而在比特币供应方面取代了它们的供应。

ETH: $193B market cap / 21M = $9,200

ETH：$ 193B市值 / 21m = $ 9,200

Instead of buying that one twenty-one millionth of Etherium, you could buy just 0.11 BTC.

您只能购买0.11 BTC，而不是购买一十万的Etherium。

Finally, he said in reality there is “no way these alts are worth that much.”

最后，他实际上说：“这些Alts绝不值得。”

New name for 1-21-millionth supply unit proposed by Mow

MOW提出的1-21亿个供应单位的新名称

Continuing the topic raised in the above-mentioned tweet, Mow suggested that perhaps one twenty-one millionth supply unit of any coin needs a name. He stressed that this is not common knowledge, but right now, 10 Sats are called one Finney (after Hal Finney, an early Bitcoin contributor).

继续在上述推文中提出的主题，MOW建议所有硬币中的21百万个供应单位都需要一个名称。他强调，这不是常识，但是目前，有10个SAT被称为一个Finney（在早期的比特币贡献者Hal Finney之后）。

But since hardly anybody needs a unit for 10 Sats. Therefore, Mow suggests, using this name to define one twenty-one millionth supply unit not only of Bitcoin but also of each large altcoin and gold. Hence, he says, “A Finney of Bitcoin = $85,000 (for now). A Finney of ETH = $9,200. A Finney of gold = $1,000,000.” Samson asked the community to share what they think about this idea.

但是，由于几乎没有人需要一个单位10个SAT。因此，MOW建议，使用此名称来定义一个不仅是比特币的21百万个供应单元，而且还定义了每个大型山寨币和黄金的供应单元。因此，他说：“比特币的Finney = $ 85,000（目前）。ETH的Finney = 9,200美元。黄金的Finney = 1,000,000美元。”萨姆森（Samson）要求社区分享他们对这个想法的看法。