比特幣Samson Mow發表了一條推文，這表明即使頂級替代幣的總硬幣供應與比特幣相似，BTC仍然以每枚硬幣的價格擊敗它們。

MOW表示，大多數Altcoins都利用了所謂的單位偏見，這是一種心理效應，這是由於它們的數十億美元供應數十億美元，有時甚至是數万億個硬幣，每枚硬幣的價格似乎都比一個BTC便宜。

Bitcoiner Samson Mow published a tweet, suggesting that even if top altcoins had a total coin supply similar to that of Bitcoin, BTC would still beat them in terms of price per coin.

比特幣Samson Mow發表了一條推文，這表明即使頂級替代幣的總硬幣供應與比特幣相似，BTC仍然以每枚硬幣的價格擊敗它們。

Mow stated that most altcoins are taking advantage of the so-called unit bias – a psychological effect which appears since due to their huge supplies of billions and sometimes even trillions on coins the price per one coin seems cheaper than that of one BTC.

MOW表示，大多數Altcoins都利用了所謂的單位偏見，這是一種心理效應，這是由於它們的數十億美元供應數十億美元，有時甚至是數万億個硬幣，每枚硬幣的價格似乎都比一個BTC便宜。

If this bias is removed, he says, then mathematically, these altcoins should be worth several thousand of dollars each. But Mow doesn’t believe in these theoretical figures, saying that Bitcoin would still have a much higher market dominance.

他說，如果消除了這種偏見，那麼這些山寨幣應該每人價值幾千美元。但是Mow不相信這些理論上的數字，他說比特幣仍然具有更高的市場優勢。

"No way XRP is worth $5,800"

“ XRP不值得$ 5,800”

Mow suggested that if this bias is removed, XRP would cost $5,800, SOL would be trading at $3,400, and ETH at $9,200. He explained that these figures can be calculated “by taking the market cap of the alts and dividing by 21 million, thus framing their supply in terms of Bitcoin supply.”

MOW建議，如果刪除了這種偏見，XRP的價格為5,800美元，SOL的交易價格為3,400美元，ETH的價格為9,200美元。他解釋說，可以“通過佔用Alts的市值並劃分2100萬，從而在比特幣供應方面取消供應來計算這些數字。”

For example, he shows, ETH: $193B market cap / 21M = $9,200. Most altcoins, Mow claims, take advantage of this unit bias “by utilizing a very high supply, so people can't figure out what they're buying.”

例如，他表明，ETH：$ 193B市值 / 21m = $ 9,200。 MOW聲稱，大多數Altcoins通過使用非常高的供應來利用該單元的偏見，因此人們無法弄清楚他們在購買什麼。 ”

Many believe that buying one XRP for $2, for example, is much cheaper than buying Bitcoin at $85,000, he says, adding that “unit bias is absolutely destroying the uninitiated.”

他說，許多人認為，以2美元的價格購買一個XRP比以85,000美元的價格購買比特幣要便宜得多。

Those numbers are calculated by taking the market cap of the alts and dividing by 21 million, thus framing their supply in terms of Bitcoin supply.

這些數字是通過將Alts的市值劃分並除以2100萬而計算得出的，從而在比特幣供應方面取代了它們的供應。

ETH: $193B market cap / 21M = $9,200

ETH：$ 193B市值 / 21m = $ 9,200

Instead of buying that one twenty-one millionth of Etherium, you could buy just 0.11 BTC.

您只能購買0.11 BTC，而不是購買一十萬的Etherium。

Finally, he said in reality there is “no way these alts are worth that much.”

最後，他實際上說：“這些Alts絕不值得。”

New name for 1-21-millionth supply unit proposed by Mow

MOW提出的1-21億個供應單位的新名稱

Continuing the topic raised in the above-mentioned tweet, Mow suggested that perhaps one twenty-one millionth supply unit of any coin needs a name. He stressed that this is not common knowledge, but right now, 10 Sats are called one Finney (after Hal Finney, an early Bitcoin contributor).

繼續在上述推文中提出的主題，MOW建議所有硬幣中的21百萬個供應單位都需要一個名稱。他強調，這不是常識，但是目前，有10個SAT被稱為一個Finney（在早期的比特幣貢獻者Hal Finney之後）。

But since hardly anybody needs a unit for 10 Sats. Therefore, Mow suggests, using this name to define one twenty-one millionth supply unit not only of Bitcoin but also of each large altcoin and gold. Hence, he says, “A Finney of Bitcoin = $85,000 (for now). A Finney of ETH = $9,200. A Finney of gold = $1,000,000.” Samson asked the community to share what they think about this idea.

但是，由於幾乎沒有人需要一個單位10個SAT。因此，MOW建議，使用此名稱來定義一個不僅是比特幣的21百萬個供應單元，而且還定義了每個大型山寨幣和黃金的供應單元。因此，他說：“比特幣的Finney = $ 85,000（目前）。ETH的Finney = 9,200美元。黃金的Finney = 1,000,000美元。”薩姆森（Samson）要求社區分享他們對這個想法的看法。