比特币与狗狗币：辩论开始！

Cyber​​ Capital 创始人兼首席投资官贾斯汀·邦斯 (Justin Bons) 在 X（前身为 Twitter）上批评比特币，称其为“终极模因币”。

Cyber Capital founder and Chief Investment Officer Justin Bons took to X (formerly Twitter) to criticize Bitcoin, dubbing it the “ultimate memecoin.” Moreover, he argued that Dogecoin, often derided for its meme status, has more utility.

Cyber​​ Capital 创始人兼首席投资官贾斯汀·邦斯 (Justin Bons) 在 X（前身为 Twitter）上批评比特币，称其为“终极模因币”。此外，他认为，经常因其模因地位而受到嘲笑的狗狗币具有更多实用性。

In a series of posts, Bons expressed his skepticism toward Bitcoin’s status as a “store of value,” emphasizing that it fails to live up to this claim.

在一系列帖子中，邦斯表达了他对比特币作为“价值储存手段”地位的怀疑，并强调它未能兑现这一说法。

“Dogecoin is at least honest about being a meme coin,” Bons wrote. Meanwhile, he contrasted it with Bitcoin, which he argued “pretends to be more than it really is.” He claimed that the true “meme” in Bitcoin is its supposed role as both money and a store of value, implying that BTC has failed to fulfill these promises.

“狗狗币至少是诚实的，作为一种模因币，”邦斯写道。与此同时，他将其与比特币进行了对比，他认为比特币“假装的比实际的要多”。他声称，比特币真正的“模因”是它既是货币又是价值储存手段，这意味着比特币未能兑现这些承诺。

The debate quickly escalated as users engaged with Bons’s provocative statement with one commenting, “people like you end up buying so much of it later on.” Responding, Bons clarified his stance and trading history.

随着用户对 Bons 的挑衅性言论进行关注，争论迅速升级，其中一位评论道：“像你这样的人后来会买很多东西。”作为回应，邦斯澄清了他的立场和交易历史。

Dogecoin is at least honest about being a meme coin

狗狗币至少诚实地认为自己是一种迷因币

Unlike BTC which pretends to be more than it really is

与 BTC 不同的是，BTC 假装的比实际的要多

BTC is in fact the ultimate memecoin! DOGE even has more utility in comparison

BTC 实际上是终极模因币！相比之下，DOGE 甚至具有更多实用性

The meme is money & store of value, what a shame that BTC cannot live up to these promises!

模因是货币和价值存储，比特币无法兑现这些承诺真是太遗憾了！

— Justin Bons (@Justin_Bons) November 4, 2024

— 贾斯汀·邦斯 (@Justin_Bons) 2024 年 11 月 4 日

He revealed he first bought Bitcoin in 2013, later shifting his investment to Ethereum in 2016 and then to Solana in 2023. Highlighting his adaptability in the rapidly evolving crypto landscape, Bons noted:

他透露，他于 2013 年首次购买了比特币，随后于 2016 年将投资转向以太坊，然后于 2023 年转向 Solana。Bons 强调了他在快速发展的加密货币领域的适应能力，并指出：

“People like me are very early & remain on the cutting edge by constantly being able to change our minds. Those who cannot update their thesis, end up being left behind; stuck in a cult.”

“像我这样的人很早，并且通过不断改变想法来保持领先地位。那些不能更新论文的人，最终会被抛在后面；陷入邪教之中。”

Another user questioned Bons’s high regard for Dogecoin, asking if DOGE has long-term potential. Bons replied that he doesn’t actually “believe in meme coins at all.” This suggests that if Dogecoin were to acquire significant utility, it would cease being a meme coin – a “catch-22” in his view.

另一位用户质疑 Bons 对狗狗币的高度重视，询问 DOGE 是否具有长期潜力。邦斯回答说，他实际上“根本不相信模因币”。这表明，如果狗狗币获得了显着的效用，它将不再是一种模因币——在他看来，这是“第 22 条军规”。

Thus, he reinforced his position as a value investor, stating, “The point of this post was to show how bad BTC really is by comparing it to DOGE.” The conversation continued with a user pointing out BTC’s advantages, such as its liquidity and extensive trading pairs, which give it value beyond Dogecoin.

因此，他强化了自己作为价值投资者的地位，并表示：“这篇文章的目的是通过将 BTC 与 DOGE 进行比较来展示 BTC 到底有多糟糕。”对话继续，一位用户指出了 BTC 的优势，例如其流动性和广泛的交易对，这使其具有超越狗狗币的价值。

Bons argued that liquidity and trading pairs alone don’t justify Bitcoin’s value. “A memecoin can also have deep liquidity & lots of trading pairs,” he responded. For Bons, Bitcoin’s reliance on “circular” arguments about its value and trading depth reveals a lack of substantive utility that he deems essential to “true” value.

邦斯认为，仅流动性和交易对并不能证明比特币的价值。 “模因币还可以拥有深厚的流动性和大量的交易对，”他回答道。对于邦斯来说，比特币对其价值和交易深度的“循环”论证的依赖表明，比特币缺乏他认为对“真正”价值至关重要的实质性效用。

Bons’s criticism highlights a broader debate within the cryptocurrency community regarding the purpose and value of digital assets, especially as Bitcoin continues to be regarded by some as “digital gold.” His remarks resonate with those who question Bitcoin’s scalability and real-world applications, comparing it unfavorably to projects like Ethereum or Solana, which offer decentralized finance (DeFi) functionalities.

邦斯的批评凸显了加密货币社区内关于数字资产的目的和价值的更广泛的争论，特别是在比特币继续被一些人视为“数字黄金”的情况下。他的言论引起了那些质疑比特币可扩展性和现实世界应用的人的共鸣，并将其与以太坊或 Solana 等提供去中心化金融 (DeFi) 功能的项目进行了不利比较。