比特幣與狗狗幣：辯論開始！

Cyber​​ Capital 創始人兼首席投資官賈斯汀·邦斯 (Justin Bons) 在 X（前身為 Twitter）上批評比特幣，稱其為“終極模因幣”。

Cyber Capital founder and Chief Investment Officer Justin Bons took to X (formerly Twitter) to criticize Bitcoin, dubbing it the “ultimate memecoin.” Moreover, he argued that Dogecoin, often derided for its meme status, has more utility.

Cyber​​ Capital 創始人兼首席投資官賈斯汀·邦斯 (Justin Bons) 在 X（前身為 Twitter）上批評比特幣，稱其為“終極模因幣”。此外，他認為，經常因其模因地位而受到嘲笑的狗狗幣具有更多實用性。

In a series of posts, Bons expressed his skepticism toward Bitcoin’s status as a “store of value,” emphasizing that it fails to live up to this claim.

在一系列貼文中，邦斯表達了他對比特幣作為「價值儲存手段」地位的懷疑，並強調它未能兌現這一說法。

“Dogecoin is at least honest about being a meme coin,” Bons wrote. Meanwhile, he contrasted it with Bitcoin, which he argued “pretends to be more than it really is.” He claimed that the true “meme” in Bitcoin is its supposed role as both money and a store of value, implying that BTC has failed to fulfill these promises.

「狗狗幣至少是誠實的，作為一種迷因幣，」邦斯寫道。同時，他將其與比特幣進行了對比，他認為比特幣「假裝的比實際的要多」。他聲稱，比特幣真正的「迷因」是它既是貨幣又是價值儲存手段，這意味著比特幣未能兌現這些承諾。

The debate quickly escalated as users engaged with Bons’s provocative statement with one commenting, “people like you end up buying so much of it later on.” Responding, Bons clarified his stance and trading history.

隨著用戶對 Bons 的挑釁性言論進行關注，爭論迅速升級，其中一位評論道：“像你這樣的人後來會買很多東西。”作為回應，邦斯澄清了他的立場和交易歷史。

Dogecoin is at least honest about being a meme coin

狗狗幣至少誠實地認為自己是一種迷因幣

Unlike BTC which pretends to be more than it really is

與 BTC 不同的是，BTC 假裝的比實際的要多

BTC is in fact the ultimate memecoin! DOGE even has more utility in comparison

BTC 實際上是終極迷因幣！相比之下，DOGE 甚至具有更多實用性

The meme is money & store of value, what a shame that BTC cannot live up to these promises!

迷因是貨幣和價值存儲，比特幣無法兌現這些承諾真是太遺憾了！

— Justin Bons (@Justin_Bons) November 4, 2024

— 賈斯汀·邦斯 (@Justin_Bons) 2024 年 11 月 4 日

He revealed he first bought Bitcoin in 2013, later shifting his investment to Ethereum in 2016 and then to Solana in 2023. Highlighting his adaptability in the rapidly evolving crypto landscape, Bons noted:

他透露，他於 2013 年首次購買了比特幣，然後在 2016 年將投資轉向以太坊，然後在 2023 年轉向 Solana。

“People like me are very early & remain on the cutting edge by constantly being able to change our minds. Those who cannot update their thesis, end up being left behind; stuck in a cult.”

「像我這樣的人很早，並且透過不斷改變想法來保持領先地位。那些不能更新論文的人，最終會被拋在後面；陷入邪教之中。

Another user questioned Bons’s high regard for Dogecoin, asking if DOGE has long-term potential. Bons replied that he doesn’t actually “believe in meme coins at all.” This suggests that if Dogecoin were to acquire significant utility, it would cease being a meme coin – a “catch-22” in his view.

另一位用戶質疑 Bons 對狗狗幣的高度重視，並詢問 DOGE 是否具有長期潛力。邦斯回答說，他實際上「根本不相信迷因幣」。這表明，如果狗狗幣獲得了顯著的效用，它將不再是一種迷因幣——在他看來，這是「第 22 條軍規」。

Thus, he reinforced his position as a value investor, stating, “The point of this post was to show how bad BTC really is by comparing it to DOGE.” The conversation continued with a user pointing out BTC’s advantages, such as its liquidity and extensive trading pairs, which give it value beyond Dogecoin.

因此，他強化了自己作為價值投資者的地位，並表示：“這篇文章的目的是通過將 BTC 與 DOGE 進行比較來展示 BTC 到底有多糟糕。”對話繼續，一位用戶指出了 BTC 的優勢，例如其流動性和廣泛的交易對，這使其具有超越狗狗幣的價值。

Bons argued that liquidity and trading pairs alone don’t justify Bitcoin’s value. “A memecoin can also have deep liquidity & lots of trading pairs,” he responded. For Bons, Bitcoin’s reliance on “circular” arguments about its value and trading depth reveals a lack of substantive utility that he deems essential to “true” value.

邦斯認為，僅流動性和交易對並不能證明比特幣的價值。 「模因幣還可以擁有深厚的流動性和大量的交易對，」他回答。對邦斯來說，比特幣對其價值和交易深度的「循環」論點的依賴表明，比特幣缺乏他認為對「真正」價值至關重要的實質效用。

Bons’s criticism highlights a broader debate within the cryptocurrency community regarding the purpose and value of digital assets, especially as Bitcoin continues to be regarded by some as “digital gold.” His remarks resonate with those who question Bitcoin’s scalability and real-world applications, comparing it unfavorably to projects like Ethereum or Solana, which offer decentralized finance (DeFi) functionalities.

邦斯的批評凸顯了加密貨幣社群內關於數位資產的目的和價值的更廣泛的爭論，特別是在比特幣繼續被一些人視為「數位黃金」的情況下。他的言論引起了那些質疑比特幣可擴展性和現實世界應用的人的共鳴，並將其與以太坊或 Solana 等提供去中心化金融 (DeFi) 功能的項目進行了不利比較。