比特币创造者冒充者在法庭竞标失败后面临全球资产冻结

克雷格·赖特 (Craig Wright) 中本聪 (Satoshi Nakamoto) 案审判结束后，英国法官对赖特 (Wright) 的资产发出了 760 万美元的全球冻结令 (WFO)。做出这一决定是出于对赖特可能避免支付费用的担忧，因为他有财务不当行为的历史和最近的资产转移。审判基于“压倒性的证据”确定赖特关于比特币创造者的说法是错误的。

Craig Wright's Bitcoin Creator Claims Debunked, Faces Worldwide Asset Freeze

克雷格·赖特（Craig Wright）的比特币创造者声称被揭穿，面临全球资产冻结

In a highly anticipated trial that captivated the cryptocurrency community, British Judge James Mellor has delivered a decisive blow to Craig Wright's long-standing assertion that he is Satoshi Nakamoto, the enigmatic creator of Bitcoin. The jury found "overwhelming evidence" to refute Wright's claims, concluding that he is not the man behind the pseudonym.

在一场引起加密货币界高度期待的审判中，英国法官詹姆斯·梅勒 (James Mellor) 对克雷格·赖特 (Craig Wright) 长期以来声称自己是比特币神秘创造者中本聪 (Satoshi Nakamoto) 的说法给予了决定性的打击。陪审团找到了“压倒性的证据”来反驳赖特的说法，并得出结论，他不是化名背后的人。

Despite the verdict, Wright's legal battles continue, with the judge issuing a Worldwide Freezing Order (WFO) of $7.6 million in his assets. This order was granted at the request of the Crypto Open Patent Alliance (COPA), who alleged that Wright posed a high risk of evading payment of the substantial trial costs.

尽管做出了判决，赖特的法律斗争仍在继续，法官发布了全球冻结令 (WFO)，冻结了赖特 760 万美元的资产。该命令是应加密货币开放专利联盟 (COPA) 的要求授予的，该联盟声称 Wright 存在逃避支付巨额审判费用的高风险。

COPA's concerns were raised by Wright's recent actions, including transferring shares in his company to a Singapore-based entity. Judge Mellor also cited Wright's "history of default in relation to orders for the payment of money" and his "lying track record" as factors contributing to the decision.

赖特最近的行动引起了 COPA 的担忧，其中包括将其公司的股份转让给一家新加坡实体。梅勒法官还引用了赖特的“与付款命令相关的违约历史”和他的“撒谎记录”作为促成这一决定的因素。

The trial has shed light on the complex and often contentious nature of authorship in the decentralized world of cryptocurrency. Wright's unproven claims had cast a shadow over the industry, leading to years of uncertainty and speculation. The judge's ruling has now definitively put those claims to rest.

该审判揭示了去中心化加密货币世界中作者身份复杂且经常引起争议的本质。赖特未经证实的说法给整个行业蒙上了阴影，导致了多年的不确定性和猜测。法官的裁决现已明确驳回这些主张。

The evidence presented during the trial painted a compelling picture of a man desperately seeking to legitimize his dubious assertions. Wright's inability to provide a coherent narrative, his inconsistencies, and his willingness to misrepresent facts and documents eroded any remaining credibility he may have had.

审判期间提供的证据描绘了一幅令人信服的画面：一个人拼命寻求使他可疑的主张合法化。赖特无法提供连贯的叙述，他的前后矛盾，以及他歪曲事实和文件的意愿，侵蚀了他可能拥有的任何剩余可信度。

The prosecution presented an overwhelming case against Wright, demonstrating that he lacked the technical expertise, the financial acumen, and the foresight necessary to have created Bitcoin. Expert witnesses testified that Wright's knowledge of cryptography was superficial and that his purported involvement in the development of the blockchain was fabricated.

检方对赖特提出了压倒性的指控，表明他缺乏创造比特币所需的技术专业知识、财务头脑和远见。专家证人证明，赖特的密码学知识很肤浅，他所谓的参与区块链开发的行为是捏造的。

The judge's conclusion, therefore, was both unsurprising and necessary. By dismissing Wright's claims, the court has reaffirmed the importance of truth and integrity in an industry that has long been plagued by deception and fraud.

因此，法官的结论既不足为奇，又必要。通过驳回赖特的主张，法院重申了真相和诚信对于这个长期受到欺骗和欺诈困扰的行业的重要性。

The WFO issued against Wright is a significant step towards ensuring that he is held accountable for his actions. COPA's request for an expedited hearing on the matter indicates their determination to recover the costs incurred during the trial.

针对 Wright 发布的 WFO 是确保他对其行为负责的重要一步。 COPA 要求就此事加快听证会，表明他们决心收回审判期间产生的费用。

While the final judgment officially declaring Wright's claims false has yet to be published, the judge's ruling sends a clear message: individuals seeking to exploit the anonymity of the cryptocurrency space for personal gain will be exposed and held responsible.

虽然正式宣布赖特的指控虚假的最终判决尚未公布，但法官的裁决发出了明确的信息：试图利用加密货币空间的匿名性谋取个人利益的个人将被曝光并被追究责任。

The trial has also raised important questions about the legal framework surrounding cryptocurrency and the challenges of attributing ownership and responsibility in a decentralized system. The outcome of this case will undoubtedly shape future discussions and debates on these issues.

该审判还提出了有关加密货币法律框架的重要问题，以及在去中心化系统中归属所有权和责任的挑战。此案的结果无疑将影响未来有关这些问题的讨论和辩论。

As the dust settles on this landmark trial, the cryptocurrency community can take solace in the fact that truth has prevailed. Craig Wright's false claims have been debunked, and his attempts to rewrite history have been met with the full force of the law.

随着这一具有里程碑意义的审判尘埃落定，加密货币社区可以因真相已占上风而感到安慰。克雷格·赖特的虚假指控已被揭穿，他改写历史的企图也受到了法律的全力制裁。