比特幣創造者冒充者在法庭競標失敗後面臨全球資產凍結

在 Craig Wright 中本聰 (Satoshi Nakamoto) 案審判結束後，英國法官對賴特 (Satoshi Nakamoto) 的資產發出了 760 萬美元的全球凍結令 (WFO)。做出這項決定是出於對賴特可能避免支付費用的擔憂，因為他有財務不當行為的歷史和最近的資產轉移。審判基於「壓倒性的證據」來確定賴特關於比特幣創造者的說法是錯誤的。

Craig Wright's Bitcoin Creator Claims Debunked, Faces Worldwide Asset Freeze

克雷格·賴特（Craig Wright）的比特幣創造者聲稱被揭穿，面臨全球資產凍結

In a highly anticipated trial that captivated the cryptocurrency community, British Judge James Mellor has delivered a decisive blow to Craig Wright's long-standing assertion that he is Satoshi Nakamoto, the enigmatic creator of Bitcoin. The jury found "overwhelming evidence" to refute Wright's claims, concluding that he is not the man behind the pseudonym.

在一場引起加密貨幣界高度期待的審判中，英國法官詹姆斯·梅勒(James Mellor) 對克雷格·賴特(Craig Wright) 長期以來聲稱自己是比特幣神秘創造者中本聰(Satoshi Nakamoto ) 的說法給予了決定性的打擊。陪審團找到了「壓倒性的證據」來反駁賴特的說法，並得出結論，他不是化名背後的人。

Despite the verdict, Wright's legal battles continue, with the judge issuing a Worldwide Freezing Order (WFO) of $7.6 million in his assets. This order was granted at the request of the Crypto Open Patent Alliance (COPA), who alleged that Wright posed a high risk of evading payment of the substantial trial costs.

儘管做出了判決，賴特的法律鬥爭仍在繼續，法官發布了全球凍結令 (WFO)，凍結了賴特 760 萬美元的資產。該命令是應加密貨幣開放專利聯盟 (COPA) 的要求授予的，該聯盟聲稱 Wright 存在逃避支付巨額審判費用的高風險。

COPA's concerns were raised by Wright's recent actions, including transferring shares in his company to a Singapore-based entity. Judge Mellor also cited Wright's "history of default in relation to orders for the payment of money" and his "lying track record" as factors contributing to the decision.

賴特最近的行動引起了 COPA 的擔憂，其中包括將其公司的股份轉讓給一家新加坡實體。梅勒法官還引用了賴特的“與付款命令相關的違約歷史”和他的“撒謊記錄”作為促成這一決定的因素。

The trial has shed light on the complex and often contentious nature of authorship in the decentralized world of cryptocurrency. Wright's unproven claims had cast a shadow over the industry, leading to years of uncertainty and speculation. The judge's ruling has now definitively put those claims to rest.

該審判揭示了去中心化加密貨幣世界中作者身份複雜且經常引起爭議的本質。賴特未經證實的說法給整個行業蒙上了陰影，導致了多年的不確定性和猜測。法官的裁決現已明確駁回這些主張。

The evidence presented during the trial painted a compelling picture of a man desperately seeking to legitimize his dubious assertions. Wright's inability to provide a coherent narrative, his inconsistencies, and his willingness to misrepresent facts and documents eroded any remaining credibility he may have had.

審判期間提供的證據描繪了一幅令人信服的畫面：一個人拼命尋求使他可疑的主張合法化。賴特無法提供連貫的敘述，他的前後矛盾，以及他歪曲事實和文件的意願，侵蝕了他可能擁有的任何剩餘可信度。

The prosecution presented an overwhelming case against Wright, demonstrating that he lacked the technical expertise, the financial acumen, and the foresight necessary to have created Bitcoin. Expert witnesses testified that Wright's knowledge of cryptography was superficial and that his purported involvement in the development of the blockchain was fabricated.

檢方對賴特提出了壓倒性的指控，表明他缺乏創造比特幣所需的技術專業知識、財務頭腦和遠見。專家證人證明，賴特的密碼學知識很膚淺，他所謂的參與區塊鏈開發的行為是捏造的。

The judge's conclusion, therefore, was both unsurprising and necessary. By dismissing Wright's claims, the court has reaffirmed the importance of truth and integrity in an industry that has long been plagued by deception and fraud.

因此，法官的結論既不足為奇，也必要。透過駁回賴特的主張，法院重申了真相和誠信對於這個長期受到欺騙和欺詐困擾的行業的重要性。

The WFO issued against Wright is a significant step towards ensuring that he is held accountable for his actions. COPA's request for an expedited hearing on the matter indicates their determination to recover the costs incurred during the trial.

針對 Wright 發布的 WFO 是確保他對其行為負責的重要一步。 COPA 要求就此事加快聽證會，表明他們決心收回審判期間產生的費用。

While the final judgment officially declaring Wright's claims false has yet to be published, the judge's ruling sends a clear message: individuals seeking to exploit the anonymity of the cryptocurrency space for personal gain will be exposed and held responsible.

雖然正式宣布賴特的指控虛假的最終判決尚未公佈，但法官的裁決發出了明確的信息：試圖利用加密貨幣空間的匿名性謀取個人利益的個人將被曝光並被追究責任。

The trial has also raised important questions about the legal framework surrounding cryptocurrency and the challenges of attributing ownership and responsibility in a decentralized system. The outcome of this case will undoubtedly shape future discussions and debates on these issues.

該審判還提出了有關加密貨幣法律框架的重要問題，以及在去中心化系統中歸屬所有權和責任的挑戰。此案的結果無疑將影響未來有關這些問題的討論和辯論。

As the dust settles on this landmark trial, the cryptocurrency community can take solace in the fact that truth has prevailed. Craig Wright's false claims have been debunked, and his attempts to rewrite history have been met with the full force of the law.

隨著這一具有里程碑意義的審判塵埃落定，加密貨幣社群可以因真相已佔上風而感到安慰。克雷格·賴特的虛假指控已被揭穿，他改寫歷史的企圖也受到了法律的全力製裁。