比特币（BTC）长期以来一直被称为牢不可破和不可触及的

长期以来，比特币（BTC）被誉为牢不可破且无法触及的，这是反对变革力量的数字据点。

Bitcoin (BTC) is known for its resilience and strength, but a new threat is quickly approaching. As institutions increase their presence in crypto, the narrative of individual users forming the backbone of Web3 is quickly changing.

比特币（BTC）以其韧性和力量而闻名，但新的威胁迅速接近。随着机构在加密货币中的存在，形成Web3骨干的个体用户的叙述正在迅速改变。

Bitcoin’s node count is growing, but incentives are still absent

比特币的节点计数正在增长，但仍然没有激励措施

Bitcoin’s full node network has grown over time, a sign of increasing adoption and a more robust infrastructure, but the core issue remains. The voluntary act of running a node still has no financial incentive. Miners earn rewards for securing the network, yet full node operators get nothing for their role in keeping Bitcoin decentralized.

比特币的完整节点网络随着时间的推移而增长，这是采用率增加和更强大的基础架构的迹象，但核心问题仍然存在。运行节点的自愿行为仍然没有经济激励。矿工可以通过确保网络获得奖励，但是完整的节点运营商在保持比特币分散方面的作用一无所获。

At the same time, a significant portion of these nodes are run by exchanges, custodians and large mining pools. These are centralized entities with financial incentives to maintain control. Suppose Bitcoin’s node network continues to expand without proper incentives. In that case, the risk remains that validation will become increasingly dependent on a few well-funded players rather than a truly distributed base of individual users (see Figure 1).

同时，这些节点的很大一部分是由交流，保管人和大型采矿池运行的。这些是具有维持控制权的经济激励措施的集中实体。假设比特币的节点网络在没有适当激励措施的情况下继续扩展。在这种情况下，风险仍然是，验证将越来越依赖于一些资金充分的玩家，而不是真正分布的单个用户基础（见图1）。

FBitcoin node operation has increased by only 15,605 in 8 years. Source: Bitnodes.io

在8年内，FBITCOIN节点的操作仅增加了15,605。来源：bitnodes.io

All of this comes as running a Bitcoin node has never been easier. Plug-and-play solutions like Umbrel, Start9, RaspiBlitz, Cubit and Ronin Dojo allow anyone to set up a full node on low-cost hardware with minimal technical knowledge. These tools have lowered the barrier to entry, making node operation more accessible than ever before.

所有这些都是因为运行比特币节点从未如此简单。诸如Umbrel，Start9，Raspiblitz，Cubit和Ronin Dojo之类的插件解决方案允许任何人在低成本硬件上设置一个具有最低技术知识的低成本硬件。这些工具降低了进入障碍，使节点操作比以往任何时候都更容易访问。

Yet adoption remains stagnant. Despite the ease of setup, most Bitcoin users still do not run their own nodes. The reason is simple: There is no financial incentive to do so.

然而，收养仍然停滞不前。尽管设置易于设置，但大多数比特币用户仍然无法运行自己的节点。原因很简单：没有经济动力这样做。

Recent: Decentralization is in danger — We can fix itUnlike miners, who earn block subsidies and transaction fees for securing the network, full node operators receive nothing. They validate transactions, enforce consensus rules, and contribute to Bitcoin’s decentralization, yet their efforts go unrewarded. As a result, node operation remains an ideological commitment rather than an economically viable activity.

最近：权力下放是危险的 - 我们可以修复类似iTunike的矿工，他们赚取了确保网络的收入补贴和交易费用，完整的节点运营商一无所获。他们验证交易，执行共识规则，并为比特币的权力下放做出贡献，但他们的努力却没有得到回报。结果，节点操作仍然是意识形态上的承诺，而不是经济上可行的活动。

If Bitcoin must be forked, we must use it to strengthen decentralization

如果必须分叉比特币，我们必须使用它来加强权力下放

Bitcoin is quickly approaching a crucial moment with the upcoming quantum-resistant hard fork. This upgrade will be fundamental in ensuring the long-term security of Bitcoin's blockchain against the threat of quantum computers, which could render current cryptographic algorithms obsolete.

比特币正在快速接近至关重要的时刻，即将抗量子的硬叉。此升级将是确保比特币区块链对量子计算机威胁的长期安全性的基础，这可能使当前的加密算法过时。

However, while this technological change is widely recognized, another pressing issue that needs immediate attention is the lack of proper incentives for full node operators.

但是，尽管这种技术变化得到了广泛认可，但需要立即关注的另一个紧迫问题是缺乏对完整节点操作员的适当激励措施。

Full node operators play a critical role in Bitcoin's decentralized governance and surveillance. They download and process the entire blockchain, ensuring the integrity of transactions and the adherence to Bitcoin's code. Without a sufficient number of nodes, Bitcoin would become more vulnerable to censorship and manipulation.

完整的节点操作员在比特币的分散治理和监视中起着至关重要的作用。他们下载并处理整个区块链，确保交易的完整性和遵守比特币代码。没有足够数量的节点，比特币将变得更容易受到审查和操纵的影响。

Despite this crucial contribution, full node operators are currently not financially rewarded for their efforts. Miners, on the other hand, are incentivized to secure the network with their hash power, and they receive both block subsidies and transaction fees.

尽管有这一关键贡献，但全节点运营商目前的努力并未在财务上得到奖励。另一方面，矿工被激励以用自己的哈希功率确保网络的确保，并获得块补贴和交易费用。

The absence of incentives for full node operators is becoming increasingly problematic as institutions and large players are deploying more nodes, potentially leading to a scenario where a smaller number of well-funded entities could exert disproportionate influence over Bitcoin's validation process.

随着机构和大型参与者正在部署更多的节点，缺乏全节点运算符的激励措施变得越来越有问题，这可能导致一种情况，在这种情况下，较少数量的资金良好的实体可能对比特币验证过程产生不成比例的影响。

This would be a step back from Bitcoin's original vision of a decentralized and community-driven network.

这将是比特币对分散和社区驱动网络的原始愿景的一步。

To mitigate this risk and ensure the long-term health of Bitcoin, it is essential to introduce a mechanism that incentivizes individuals to run full nodes. This could be achieved by allocating a portion of the block reward to full node operators or by creating a separate token that is distributed proportionally to the amount of time a node is online and actively validating transactions.

为了减轻这种风险并确保比特币的长期健康，至关重要的是引入一种激励个人运行完整节点的机制。通过将部分奖励分配给完整节点运算符或创建与节点在线的时间成比例分配并积极验证交易的时间量，可以实现这一目标。

It is important to note that poorly designed incentives could introduce new risks. For example, a poorly designed program could backfire and be open to Sybil attacks, where bad actors spin up thousands of fake nodes to exploit the reward system.

重要的是要注意，设计较差的激励措施可能会引入新的风险。例如，设计良好的程序可能适得其反，并对Sybil攻击开放，那里的恶劣演员旋转了数千个假节点以利用奖励系统。

This would defeat the whole purpose of the incentive program and could destabilize the entire network. Moreover, it is crucial to consider the technical challenges involved in measuring node uptime and performance accurately.

这将打败激励计划的全部目的，并可能破坏整个网络的稳定。此外，要准确地测量节点正常运行时间和性能所带来的技术挑战至关重要。

If Bitcoin must be forked, we must use it to strengthen decentralization

如果必须分叉比特币，我们必须使用它来加强权力下放

Critics of the proposal argue that Bitcoin’s monetary policy should remain untouched. Others warn that introducing full node incentives could lead to Sybil attacks, where bad actors spin up thousands of of fake nodes to exploit rewards. These concerns are valid — but they ignore the larger reality.

该提案的批评者认为，比特币的货币政策应保持不变。其他人警告说，引入完整节点激励措施可能会导致Sybil攻击，在那里，恶劣的演员旋转了数千个假节点以利用奖励。这些问题是有效的 - 但它们忽略了更大的现实。

Bitcoin is on the path toward a forced consensus change. The honest debate is not whether Bitcoin should change but whether we will use this moment to strengthen it.

比特币正走向强迫共识的道路。诚实的辩论不是比特币是否应该改变，而是我们是否会利用这一刻来加强它。

If full Bitcoin node incentives are implemented correctly, they could drive a surge in node adoption, strengthening the network’s censorship resistance and reinforcing its decentralization. This would reduce dependence on large mining pools and exchanges for validation, spreading control more evenly among individual participants. Bitcoiners will have to continue pushing to keep Bitcoin resilient against corporate influence in a post-quantum world where security and decentralization will matter

如果正确实施了全比特币节点激励措施，它们可能会推动采用节点的激增，增强网络的审查阻力并加强其权力下放化。这将减少对大型采矿池的依赖和验证交换，从而在个人参与者中更平均地传播控制。比特币者将不得不继续推动比特币在安全和权力下放的量子世界中对公司影响的弹性