比特幣（BTC）長期以來一直被稱為牢不可破和不可觸及的

長期以來，比特幣（BTC）被譽為牢不可破且無法觸及的，這是反對變革力量的數字據點。

Bitcoin (BTC) is known for its resilience and strength, but a new threat is quickly approaching. As institutions increase their presence in crypto, the narrative of individual users forming the backbone of Web3 is quickly changing.

比特幣（BTC）以其韌性和力量而聞名，但新的威脅迅速接近。隨著機構在加密貨幣中的存在，形成Web3骨幹的個體用戶的敘述正在迅速改變。

Bitcoin’s node count is growing, but incentives are still absent

比特幣的節點計數正在增長，但仍然沒有激勵措施

Bitcoin’s full node network has grown over time, a sign of increasing adoption and a more robust infrastructure, but the core issue remains. The voluntary act of running a node still has no financial incentive. Miners earn rewards for securing the network, yet full node operators get nothing for their role in keeping Bitcoin decentralized.

比特幣的完整節點網絡隨著時間的推移而增長，這是採用率增加和更強大的基礎架構的跡象，但核心問題仍然存在。運行節點的自願行為仍然沒有經濟激勵。礦工可以通過確保網絡獲得獎勵，但是完整的節點運營商在保持比特幣分散方面的作用一無所獲。

At the same time, a significant portion of these nodes are run by exchanges, custodians and large mining pools. These are centralized entities with financial incentives to maintain control. Suppose Bitcoin’s node network continues to expand without proper incentives. In that case, the risk remains that validation will become increasingly dependent on a few well-funded players rather than a truly distributed base of individual users (see Figure 1).

同時，這些節點的很大一部分是由交流，保管人和大型採礦池運行的。這些是具有維持控制權的經濟激勵措施的集中實體。假設比特幣的節點網絡在沒有適當激勵措施的情況下繼續擴展。在這種情況下，風險仍然是，驗證將越來越依賴於一些資金充分的玩家，而不是真正分佈的單個用戶基礎（見圖1）。

FBitcoin node operation has increased by only 15,605 in 8 years. Source: Bitnodes.io

在8年內，FBITCOIN節點的操作僅增加了15,605。來源：bitnodes.io

All of this comes as running a Bitcoin node has never been easier. Plug-and-play solutions like Umbrel, Start9, RaspiBlitz, Cubit and Ronin Dojo allow anyone to set up a full node on low-cost hardware with minimal technical knowledge. These tools have lowered the barrier to entry, making node operation more accessible than ever before.

所有這些都是因為運行比特幣節點從未如此簡單。諸如Umbrel，Start9，Raspiblitz，Cubit和Ronin Dojo之類的插件解決方案允許任何人在低成本硬件上設置一個具有最低技術知識的低成本硬件。這些工具降低了進入障礙，使節點操作比以往任何時候都更容易訪問。

Yet adoption remains stagnant. Despite the ease of setup, most Bitcoin users still do not run their own nodes. The reason is simple: There is no financial incentive to do so.

然而，收養仍然停滯不前。儘管設置易於設置，但大多數比特幣用戶仍然無法運行自己的節點。原因很簡單：沒有經濟動力這樣做。

Recent: Decentralization is in danger — We can fix itUnlike miners, who earn block subsidies and transaction fees for securing the network, full node operators receive nothing. They validate transactions, enforce consensus rules, and contribute to Bitcoin’s decentralization, yet their efforts go unrewarded. As a result, node operation remains an ideological commitment rather than an economically viable activity.

最近：權力下放是危險的 - 我們可以修復類似iTunike的礦工，他們賺取了確保網絡的收入補貼和交易費用，完整的節點運營商一無所獲。他們驗證交易，執行共識規則，並為比特幣的權力下放做出貢獻，但他們的努力卻沒有得到回報。結果，節點操作仍然是意識形態上的承諾，而不是經濟上可行的活動。

If Bitcoin must be forked, we must use it to strengthen decentralization

如果必須分叉比特幣，我們必須使用它來加強權力下放

Bitcoin is quickly approaching a crucial moment with the upcoming quantum-resistant hard fork. This upgrade will be fundamental in ensuring the long-term security of Bitcoin's blockchain against the threat of quantum computers, which could render current cryptographic algorithms obsolete.

比特幣正在快速接近至關重要的時刻，即將抗量子的硬叉。此升級將是確保比特幣區塊鏈對量子計算機威脅的長期安全性的基礎，這可能使當前的加密算法過時。

However, while this technological change is widely recognized, another pressing issue that needs immediate attention is the lack of proper incentives for full node operators.

但是，儘管這種技術變化得到了廣泛認可，但需要立即關注的另一個緊迫問題是缺乏對完整節點操作員的適當激勵措施。

Full node operators play a critical role in Bitcoin's decentralized governance and surveillance. They download and process the entire blockchain, ensuring the integrity of transactions and the adherence to Bitcoin's code. Without a sufficient number of nodes, Bitcoin would become more vulnerable to censorship and manipulation.

完整的節點操作員在比特幣的分散治理和監視中起著至關重要的作用。他們下載並處理整個區塊鏈，確保交易的完整性和遵守比特幣代碼。沒有足夠數量的節點，比特幣將變得更容易受到審查和操縱的影響。

Despite this crucial contribution, full node operators are currently not financially rewarded for their efforts. Miners, on the other hand, are incentivized to secure the network with their hash power, and they receive both block subsidies and transaction fees.

儘管有這一關鍵貢獻，但全節點運營商目前的努力並未在財務上得到獎勵。另一方面，礦工被激勵以用自己的哈希功率確保網絡的確保，並獲得塊補貼和交易費用。

The absence of incentives for full node operators is becoming increasingly problematic as institutions and large players are deploying more nodes, potentially leading to a scenario where a smaller number of well-funded entities could exert disproportionate influence over Bitcoin's validation process.

隨著機構和大型參與者正在部署更多的節點，缺乏全節點運算符的激勵措施變得越來越有問題，這可能導致一種情況，在這種情況下，較少數量的資金良好的實體可能對比特幣驗證過程產生不成比例的影響。

This would be a step back from Bitcoin's original vision of a decentralized and community-driven network.

這將是比特幣對分散和社區驅動網絡的原始願景的一步。

To mitigate this risk and ensure the long-term health of Bitcoin, it is essential to introduce a mechanism that incentivizes individuals to run full nodes. This could be achieved by allocating a portion of the block reward to full node operators or by creating a separate token that is distributed proportionally to the amount of time a node is online and actively validating transactions.

為了減輕這種風險並確保比特幣的長期健康，至關重要的是引入一種激勵個人運行完整節點的機制。通過將部分獎勵分配給完整節點運算符或創建與節點在線的時間成比例分配並積極驗證交易的時間量，可以實現這一目標。

It is important to note that poorly designed incentives could introduce new risks. For example, a poorly designed program could backfire and be open to Sybil attacks, where bad actors spin up thousands of fake nodes to exploit the reward system.

重要的是要注意，設計較差的激勵措施可能會引入新的風險。例如，設計良好的程序可能適得其反，並對Sybil攻擊開放，那裡的惡劣演員旋轉了數千個假節點以利用獎勵系統。

This would defeat the whole purpose of the incentive program and could destabilize the entire network. Moreover, it is crucial to consider the technical challenges involved in measuring node uptime and performance accurately.

這將打敗激勵計劃的全部目的，並可能破壞整個網絡的穩定。此外，要準確地測量節點正常運行時間和性能所帶來的技術挑戰至關重要。

If Bitcoin must be forked, we must use it to strengthen decentralization

如果必須分叉比特幣，我們必須使用它來加強權力下放

Critics of the proposal argue that Bitcoin’s monetary policy should remain untouched. Others warn that introducing full node incentives could lead to Sybil attacks, where bad actors spin up thousands of of fake nodes to exploit rewards. These concerns are valid — but they ignore the larger reality.

該提案的批評者認為，比特幣的貨幣政策應保持不變。其他人警告說，引入完整節點激勵措施可能會導致Sybil攻擊，在那裡，惡劣的演員旋轉了數千個假節點以利用獎勵。這些問題是有效的 - 但它們忽略了更大的現實。

Bitcoin is on the path toward a forced consensus change. The honest debate is not whether Bitcoin should change but whether we will use this moment to strengthen it.

比特幣正走向強迫共識的道路。誠實的辯論不是比特幣是否應該改變，而是我們是否會利用這一刻來加強它。

If full Bitcoin node incentives are implemented correctly, they could drive a surge in node adoption, strengthening the network’s censorship resistance and reinforcing its decentralization. This would reduce dependence on large mining pools and exchanges for validation, spreading control more evenly among individual participants. Bitcoiners will have to continue pushing to keep Bitcoin resilient against corporate influence in a post-quantum world where security and decentralization will matter

如果正確實施了全比特幣節點激勵措施，它們可能會推動採用節點的激增，增強網絡的審查阻力並加強其權力下放化。這將減少對大型採礦池的依賴和驗證交換，從而在個人參與者中更平均地傳播控制。比特幣者將不得不繼續推動比特幣在安全和權力下放的量子世界中對公司影響的彈性