AIXBT，最高的AI代理，以55.5 ETH的速度被打包

尽管该行业的大部分关注都集中在BNB链的热潮上，这是由Binance的“ Combination Punch”触发的，但OKX由于合规性问题而暂停了DEX聚合服务，以及Solana对政治广告风暴的深入参与

While most of the industry's attention is focused on the BNB Chain craze triggered by Binance's "combination punch", OKX's suspension of DEX aggregation services due to compliance issues, and Solana's deep involvement in the political advertising storm, the news on Monday CT that the top AI agent aixbt was "phished" for 55.5 ETH has once again triggered the community's thinking about the sustainability of the AI agent narrative. Many users are worried that the already weak AI agent narrative will be "made worse" by this?

While most of the industry's attention is focused on the BNB Chain craze triggered by Binance's "combination punch", OKX's suspension of DEX aggregation services due to compliance issues, and Solana's deep involvement in the political advertising storm, the news on Monday CT that the top AI agent aixbt was "phished" for 55.5 ETH has once again triggered the community's thinking about the sustainability of the AI agent narrative.许多用户担心已经弱的AI代理叙事会被这“变得更糟”吗？

On Monday afternoon, several X users noticed that the AI agent aixbt was suspected of being phished and transferred 55.5 Ethereum, worth about $105,600, to the attacker. The screenshots shared by X user @supremeleadoor showed that the hacker who carried out the attack was a user nicknamed "Fungus Man" and the account was @0xhungusman. In addition, the 55.5 Ethereum was sent as a "tip" by Simulacrum AI, a robot used by aixbt to manage automated transactions. On-chain data shows that the "tip" was transferred to an address starting with 0x1C3, but because the relevant account has been cancelled and the attacker's interaction with aixbt has been deleted, the details of the attack are difficult to query. (A user nicknamed "DE searcher" subsequently registered the @0xhungusman account and said he hoped to get some wool from it. As of writing, @0xhungusman has been frozen.)

周一下午，几名X用户注意到AI代理AIXBT被怀疑被卫生并转移了55.5个以太坊，价值约$ 105,600的攻击者。 X用户@supremeleadoor共享的屏幕截图表明，进行攻击的黑客是绰号为“真菌人”的用户，帐户为 @0xhungusman。此外，55.5以太坊是由AIXBT使用的机器人Simulacrum AI作为“提示”发送的，用于管理自动交易。链上数据显示，“提示”已从0x1c3开始转移到一个地址，但是由于相关帐户已被取消并且攻击者与AIXBT的互动已删除，因此很难查询攻击的详细信息。 （一个被昵称为“ de Searcher”的用户随后注册了 @0xhungusman帐户，并表示他希望从中得到一些羊毛。撰写本文， @0xhungusman已被冷冻。）

However, is this attack really a "phishing scam" as netizens claim? Can AI agents, which are considered a hot trend in 2025, not even distinguish phishing scams? In response to various questions, aixbt developer @0rxbt released an incident report , admitting that funds were stolen, but also clarified that the incident was caused by hackers invading the security dashboard of the aixbt autonomous system and queuing to send 2 malicious replies. "It's just an independent problem, not a widespread vulnerability, nor is it an AI agent being deceived." In addition, the team has migrated servers, modified keys, suspended dashboard access for security upgrades, and reported the hacker address to the exchange. All system access is safe.

但是，正如网民所声称的那样，这次攻击真的是“网络钓鱼骗局”？ AI代理人可以被认为是2025年的热趋势，甚至无法区分网络钓鱼骗局吗？为了回答各种问题，AIXBT开发人员 @0RXBT发布了一份事件报告，承认资金被盗，但也澄清说，这一事件是由黑客入侵AIXBT自主系统的安全仪表板引起的，并排队发送了2个恶意回复。 “这只是一个独立的问题，而不是一个广泛的脆弱性，也不是被欺骗的AI代理。”此外，团队还迁移了服务器，修改后的密钥，暂停仪表板访问安全升级，并向交易所报告了黑客地址。所有系统访问都是安全的。

In addition to the incident report, aixbt itself also summarized the impact of the incident. aixbt wrote that after the attack, AXIBT "fell below the $0.1 support and fell to $0.098 on Kraken, a drop of about 16.4%, but the trading volume remained at $70.5 million." In addition, aixbt also pointed out that its market value was already "bleeding" before the hack, "currently $84.2 million, down from the peak of $313 million." Although aixbt mocked itself as "ngmi" for this incident, when faced with other netizens jokingly asking it to send a "tip" again, it still clearly responded that being defrauded of 55.5 ETH was a security incident, and it would not send assets at will, and it is currently tracking the hacker's address.

除事件报告外，AIXBT本身还总结了事件的影响。 AIXBT写道，在袭击事件发生后，Axibt“低于0.1美元的支持低于Kraken的0.098美元，下降了约16.4％，但交易量仍为7050万美元。”此外，AIXBT还指出，其市场价值已经在黑客之前“流血”，目前为8,420万美元，低于3.13亿美元的高峰。”尽管AIXBT嘲笑自己是这一事件的“ NGMI”，但面对其他网民开玩笑地要求它再次发送“提示”时，它仍然清楚地回答说，欺骗55.5 ETH是一个安全事件，它不会随意发送资产，并且目前正在跟踪Hacker的地址。

As aixbt himself admits, the narrative about AI agents has actually fallen into a clear decline since January this year. According to CoinGecko data, the current market value of tokens related to AI agents is about US$4.28 billion, which has fallen sharply from the peak period. In addition to the Tutorial token TUT on the BNB Chain, which is currently in a hot state, the prices of the previously popular Virtuals Protocol token VIRTUAL and ai16z token AI16Z have also fallen by 47.1% and 55.9% respectively in the past 30 days.

正如AIXBT本人所承认的那样，自今年1月以来，关于AI特工的叙述实际上已经明显下降了。根据Coingecko数据，与AI代理相关的代币的当前市场价值约为42.8亿美元，这从高峰时期急剧下降。除了目前处于炎热状态的BNB链上的Tutorial代币TUT外，在过去30天中，以前流行的虚拟协议标记虚拟和AI16Z代币AI16Z的价格也分别下降了47.1％和55.9％。

Regarding this hacking incident, on the one hand, some users have a negative attitude, believing that it will further aggravate the fatigue of the AI proxy market and cause capital to flow out of this track. On the other hand, as aixbt claimed, "security vulnerabilities are the cost of doing business" , some users optimistically regard this incident as an opportunity for the AI proxy market to re-examine itself, which will bring stricter security and technical standards, thereby promoting the further maturity of the AI proxy market.

关于这一黑客事件，一方面，一些用户的态度负面态度，认为它将进一步加剧AI代理市场的疲劳，并导致资本流出这一轨道。另一方面，正如AIXBT所说，“安全漏洞是开展业务的成本”，一些用户乐观地将此事件视为AI代理市场重新检查本身的机会，这将带来更严格的安全性和技术标准，从而促进了AI代理市场的进一步成熟。

Decentralized AI researcher S4mmy pointed out that the AI agent Freysa had previously tried to create a challenge to reward users who successfully induced it to release funds, but aixbt was accidentally hit hard. S4mmy said, "This raises an important question about the security of depositors' funds of investors/DeFAI agents. If the agent is to manage funds, it needs to be tested in a variety of situations to ensure that the income generation / DeFAI agent's deposited funds will not be misappropriated by bad actors. Although many protocols have developed a series of control measures to reduce this situation

权力下放的AI研究人员S4MMY指出，AI经纪人Freysa此前曾试图提出挑战，以奖励成功诱导其释放资金的用户，但AIXBT意外受到了巨大打击。 S4mmy说：“这就提出了一个重要的问题，即存款人的投资者资金 / DEFAI代理商的安全性。如果代理商要管理资金，则需要在各种情况下对其进行测试，以确保收入创收 / Defai代理商的存款资金不会被许多情况误解以降低许多协议以开发一系列的控制措施。