AIXBT，最高的AI代理，以55.5 ETH的速度被打包

儘管該行業的大部分關注都集中在BNB鏈的熱潮上，這是由Binance的“ Combination Punch”觸發的，但OKX由於合規性問題而暫停了DEX聚合服務，以及Solana對政治廣告風暴的深入參與

While most of the industry's attention is focused on the BNB Chain craze triggered by Binance's "combination punch", OKX's suspension of DEX aggregation services due to compliance issues, and Solana's deep involvement in the political advertising storm, the news on Monday CT that the top AI agent aixbt was "phished" for 55.5 ETH has once again triggered the community's thinking about the sustainability of the AI agent narrative. Many users are worried that the already weak AI agent narrative will be "made worse" by this?

While most of the industry's attention is focused on the BNB Chain craze triggered by Binance's "combination punch", OKX's suspension of DEX aggregation services due to compliance issues, and Solana's deep involvement in the political advertising storm, the news on Monday CT that the top AI agent aixbt was "phished" for 55.5 ETH has once again triggered the community's thinking about the sustainability of the AI agent narrative.許多用戶擔心已經弱的AI代理敘事會被這“變得更糟”嗎？

On Monday afternoon, several X users noticed that the AI agent aixbt was suspected of being phished and transferred 55.5 Ethereum, worth about $105,600, to the attacker. The screenshots shared by X user @supremeleadoor showed that the hacker who carried out the attack was a user nicknamed "Fungus Man" and the account was @0xhungusman. In addition, the 55.5 Ethereum was sent as a "tip" by Simulacrum AI, a robot used by aixbt to manage automated transactions. On-chain data shows that the "tip" was transferred to an address starting with 0x1C3, but because the relevant account has been cancelled and the attacker's interaction with aixbt has been deleted, the details of the attack are difficult to query. (A user nicknamed "DE searcher" subsequently registered the @0xhungusman account and said he hoped to get some wool from it. As of writing, @0xhungusman has been frozen.)

週一下午，幾名X用戶注意到AI代理AIXBT被懷疑被衛生並轉移了55.5個以太坊，價值約$ 105,600的攻擊者。 X用戶@supremeleadoor共享的屏幕截圖表明，進行攻擊的黑客是綽號為“真菌人”的用戶，帳戶為 @0xhungusman。此外，55.5以太坊是由AIXBT使用的機器人Simulacrum AI作為“提示”發送的，用於管理自動交易。鏈上數據顯示，“提示”已從0x1c3開始轉移到一個地址，但是由於相關帳戶已被取消並且攻擊者與AIXBT的互動已刪除，因此很難查詢攻擊的詳細信息。 （一個被暱稱為“ de Searcher”的用戶隨後註冊了 @0xhungusman帳戶，並說他希望從中得到一些羊毛。撰寫本文， @0xhungusman已被冷凍。）

However, is this attack really a "phishing scam" as netizens claim? Can AI agents, which are considered a hot trend in 2025, not even distinguish phishing scams? In response to various questions, aixbt developer @0rxbt released an incident report , admitting that funds were stolen, but also clarified that the incident was caused by hackers invading the security dashboard of the aixbt autonomous system and queuing to send 2 malicious replies. "It's just an independent problem, not a widespread vulnerability, nor is it an AI agent being deceived." In addition, the team has migrated servers, modified keys, suspended dashboard access for security upgrades, and reported the hacker address to the exchange. All system access is safe.

但是，正如網民所聲稱的那樣，這次攻擊真的是“網絡釣魚騙局”？ AI代理人可以被認為是2025年的熱趨勢，甚至無法區分網絡釣魚騙局嗎？為了回答各種問題，AIXBT開發人員 @0RXBT發布了一份事件報告，承認資金被盜，但也澄清說，這一事件是由黑客入侵AIXBT自主系統的安全儀表板引起的，並排隊發送了2個惡意回复。 “這只是一個獨立的問題，而不是一個廣泛的脆弱性，也不是被欺騙的AI代理。”此外，團隊還遷移了服務器，修改後的密鑰，暫停儀表板訪問安全升級，並向交易所報告了黑客地址。所有系統訪問都是安全的。

In addition to the incident report, aixbt itself also summarized the impact of the incident. aixbt wrote that after the attack, AXIBT "fell below the $0.1 support and fell to $0.098 on Kraken, a drop of about 16.4%, but the trading volume remained at $70.5 million." In addition, aixbt also pointed out that its market value was already "bleeding" before the hack, "currently $84.2 million, down from the peak of $313 million." Although aixbt mocked itself as "ngmi" for this incident, when faced with other netizens jokingly asking it to send a "tip" again, it still clearly responded that being defrauded of 55.5 ETH was a security incident, and it would not send assets at will, and it is currently tracking the hacker's address.

除事件報告外，AIXBT本身還總結了事件的影響。 AIXBT寫道，在襲擊事件發生後，Axibt“低於0.1美元的支持低於Kraken的0.098美元，下降了約16.4％，但交易量仍為7050萬美元。”此外，AIXBT還指出，其市場價值已經在黑客之前“流血”，目前為8,420萬美元，低於3.13億美元的高峰。”儘管AIXBT嘲笑自己是這一事件的“ NGMI”，但面對其他網民開玩笑地要求它再次發送“提示”時，它仍然清楚地回答說，欺騙55.5 ETH是一個安全事件，它不會隨意發送資產，並且目前正在跟踪Hacker的地址。

As aixbt himself admits, the narrative about AI agents has actually fallen into a clear decline since January this year. According to CoinGecko data, the current market value of tokens related to AI agents is about US$4.28 billion, which has fallen sharply from the peak period. In addition to the Tutorial token TUT on the BNB Chain, which is currently in a hot state, the prices of the previously popular Virtuals Protocol token VIRTUAL and ai16z token AI16Z have also fallen by 47.1% and 55.9% respectively in the past 30 days.

正如AIXBT本人所承認的那樣，自今年1月以來，關於AI特工的敘述實際上已經明顯下降了。根據Coingecko數據，與AI代理相關的代幣的當前市場價值約為42.8億美元，這從高峰時期急劇下降。除了目前處於炎熱狀態的BNB鏈上的Tutorial代幣TUT外，在過去30天中，以前流行的虛擬協議標記虛擬和AI16Z代幣AI16Z的價格也分別下降了47.1％和55.9％。

Regarding this hacking incident, on the one hand, some users have a negative attitude, believing that it will further aggravate the fatigue of the AI proxy market and cause capital to flow out of this track. On the other hand, as aixbt claimed, "security vulnerabilities are the cost of doing business" , some users optimistically regard this incident as an opportunity for the AI proxy market to re-examine itself, which will bring stricter security and technical standards, thereby promoting the further maturity of the AI proxy market.

關於這一黑客事件，一方面，一些用戶的態度負面態度，認為它將進一步加劇AI代理市場的疲勞，並導致資本流出這一軌道。另一方面，正如AIXBT所說，“安全漏洞是開展業務的成本”，一些用戶樂觀地將此事件視為AI代理市場重新檢查本身的機會，這將帶來更嚴格的安全性和技術標準，從而促進了AI代理市場的進一步成熟。

Decentralized AI researcher S4mmy pointed out that the AI agent Freysa had previously tried to create a challenge to reward users who successfully induced it to release funds, but aixbt was accidentally hit hard. S4mmy said, "This raises an important question about the security of depositors' funds of investors/DeFAI agents. If the agent is to manage funds, it needs to be tested in a variety of situations to ensure that the income generation / DeFAI agent's deposited funds will not be misappropriated by bad actors. Although many protocols have developed a series of control measures to reduce this situation

權力下放的AI研究人員S4MMY指出，AI經紀人Freysa此前曾試圖提出挑戰，以獎勵成功誘導其釋放資金的用戶，但AIXBT意外受到了巨大打擊。 S4mmy說：“這就提出了一個重要的問題，即存款人的投資者資金 / DEFAI代理商的安全性。如果代理商要管理資金，則需要在各種情況下對其進行測試，以確保收入創收 / Defai代理商的存款資金不會被許多情況誤解以降低許多協議以開發一系列的控制措施。