气滴已成为代币分布最广泛的方法之一

该报告确定了两种主要类型的空调类型：追溯气动器，这些空调奖励用户在没有事先通知的情况下奖励过去的操作，并且订婚空调

Airdrops have become one of the most widely used methods for token distribution in the cryptocurrency industry, but they are “certainly not without certain issues,” according to a new report by Binance Research.

根据Binance Research的一份新报告，AIRDROP已成为加密货币行业中令牌分布最广泛的方法之一，但它们“当然不是没有某些问题”。

The report, which was released on Thursday, identifies two primary types of airdrops: Retroactive Airdrops that reward users for past actions without prior notification, and Engagement Airdrops that announce qualifying actions in advance to attract new users.

该报告于周四发布，确定了两种主要类型的气滴类型：追溯性气动器，这些呼吸台无需事先通知，奖励用户过去的动作，以及订婚的空投，这些活动宣布提前宣布合格的行动以吸引新用户。

Using sentiment analysis conducted with X’s Grok AI, the report evaluates crypto community reactions to recent airdrops.major failures include last-minute changes and unclear eligibility

报告使用X的Grok AI进行的情感分析，该报告评估了加密社区对最近的Airdrops的反应。Major失败包括最后一刻的更改和不清楚的资格

The Binance Research report identifies several common mistakes that have damaged community trust in airdrops.

Binance研究报告确定了几个常见错误，这些错误损害了社区对空投的信任。

One of the most problematic practices is reducing community token allocations shortly before distribution.

最有问题的做法之一是在分发前不久减少社区令牌分配。

The report cites Redstone’s March 2025 airdrop as an example, where the team cut the community allocation from 9.5% to 5% at the last minute, triggering “significant community backlash.” It further notes,

该报告引用了雷德斯通（Redstone）2025年3月的AIRDROP为例，该团队在最后一刻将社区分配从9.5％降低到5％，引发了“重大社区的强烈反对”。它进一步指出，

“Last minute changes to token allocations may result in discontent amongst a project’s community. They may also signal a lack of thought and planning, which could undermine the community’s trust in the project team.”

“对令牌分配的最后一分钟变化可能会导致项目社区之间的不满。它们也可能表明缺乏思想和计划，这可能会破坏社区对项目团队的信任。”

Another recurring issue involves unclear eligibility criteria that lead to “uneven rewards that don’t necessarily reflect user activity.”

另一个经常出现的问题涉及不清楚的资格标准，导致“不一定反映用户活动的不均值”。

The report points to Scroll’s October 2024 airdrop, which distributed 7% of its total supply but faced criticism for “arbitrary snapshot and hidden rules.”

该报告指向Scroll于2024年10月的Airdrop，该卷奖分配了其总供应量的7％，但面临“任意快照和隐藏规则”的批评。

Insider-heavy distributions also received criticism, with Kaito’s February 2025 airdrop highlighted for allocating 43.3% to team/investors and only 10% to the community.

内部人士繁重的分销也受到了批评，凯托（Kaito）2025年2月的Airdrop强调了将43.3％的团队/投资者分配给社区的10％。

The report also notes concerns about large allocations to influencers who “may choose to sell immediately, diluting the value for genuine users.”

该报告还指出，人们对“可能选择立即销售，稀释真正用户的价值”的有影响力者的大量分配担忧。”

The report adds that airdrops with broad token distribution and a focus on community engagement, such as Pudgy Penguins and Hyperliquid, drew the most favorable reactions from users.

该报告补充说，具有广泛的代币分布和关注社区参与的空气流量，例如矮胖的企鹅和超流动，吸引了用户最有利的反应。

In a collaboration with X’s Grok AI, Binance Research analyzed social media feedback on notable token distributions from the past year.

在与X的Grok AI合作中，Binance Research分析了社交媒体对过去一年中著名分布的反馈。

The resulting sentiment scores, ranging from 1-10, provide insights into what factors contribute to positive community reception.

由1-10的人的情感得分提供了有关哪些因素有助于积极社区接待的洞察力。

Pudgy Penguins achieved the highest sentiment score (10) for its December 2024 airdrop.

矮胖的企鹅在2024年12月的空投中获得了最高的情感得分（10）。

The report also noted that “community expectations were largely met” and a “high percentage of token supply went to Pudgy Penguin NFT holders.”

该报告还指出，“社区的期望得到了很大的满足”，“代币的供应量很高，供应质量很高。”

Hyperliquid followed closely with a score of 9, praised for its approach of heavily rewarding “early adopters of the protocol.”

超级流动的紧随其后，得分为9，以其重大奖励的“协议的早期采用者”而受到赞扬。

Other well-received airdrops included Berachain (8), ZKsync (8), and Grass (8), with common factors being strong community support, clear allocation rules, and appropriate rewards for early ecosystem participants.

其他广受欢迎的空投包括Berachain（8），Zksync（8）和Grass（8），共同因素是社区支持，明确的分配规则以及早期生态系统参与者的适当奖励。

In contrast, projects with the lowest sentiment scores included Redstone (2) and Scroll (3), with criticisms focusing on last-minute allocation changes and perceptions of excessive airdrop farming.

相比之下，情感得分最低的项目包括红石（2）和卷轴（3），批评着重于最后一刻的分配变化和对过度气管耕作的看法。

Recommendations For Improving Future Token Distributions

改善未来令牌分布的建议

Binance Research offers three primary recommendations for projects trying to improve their airdrop processes.

Binance Research为试图改善其空调过程的项目提供了三个主要建议。

One is increasing focus and transparency, improving community involvement, and implementing better monitoring tools to prevent exploitation.

一种是越来越多的焦点和透明度，改善社区参与，并实施更好的监视工具以防止剥削。

For transparency improvements, the report distinguishes between approaches suitable for different airdrop types.

为了提高透明度，该报告区分了适合不同气流类型的方法。

With Retroactive Airdrops, projects should “ensure distribution metrics are clearly communicated to user bases before airdrops are made claimable” and maintain continuous communication to align community expectations with project goals.

借助追溯气动器，项目应“确保在使空投声明之前清楚地将分销指标清楚地传达给用户群”，并保持持续的沟通以使社区期望与项目目标保持一致。

For Engagement Airdrops, the recommendation is to “provide airdrop distribution metrics as clearly as possible” and “avoid making changes once publicly published.”

对于参与空调，建议是“尽可能清楚地提供空调分销指标”，并“避免在公开发布后进行更改”。

The report acknowledges the growing threat of “sybil farming” where users create multiple accounts to maximize airdrop rewards.

该报告承认，“ Sybil耕作”的威胁日益增长，用户创建了多个帐户以最大程度地提高气流奖励。

It cites projects like LayerZero that have worked with on-chain analytics firms to identify and disqualify farmers from receiving tokens.

它引用了诸如LoyeZero之类的项目，这些项目曾与链上分析公司合作，以识别和取消农民获得代币的资格。

Looking toward the future, Binance Research expresses optimism that as monitoring tools improve and become more widely available, “unwanted airdrop farming activity should trend to zero.”

展望未来，Binance Research表示乐观，随着监视工具的改善并变得更加广泛，“不必要的空调耕作活动应趋于零。”