氣滴已成為代幣分佈最廣泛的方法之一

該報告確定了兩種主要類型的空調類型：追溯氣動器，這些空調獎勵用戶在沒有事先通知的情況下獎勵過去的操作，並且訂婚空調

Airdrops have become one of the most widely used methods for token distribution in the cryptocurrency industry, but they are “certainly not without certain issues,” according to a new report by Binance Research.

根據Binance Research的一份新報告，AIRDROP已成為加密貨幣行業中令牌分佈最廣泛的方法之一，但它們“當然不是沒有某些問題”。

The report, which was released on Thursday, identifies two primary types of airdrops: Retroactive Airdrops that reward users for past actions without prior notification, and Engagement Airdrops that announce qualifying actions in advance to attract new users.

該報告於週四發布，確定了兩種主要類型的氣滴類型：追溯性氣動器，這些呼吸台無需事先通知，獎勵用戶過去的動作，以及訂婚的空投，這些活動宣布提前宣布合格的行動以吸引新用戶。

Using sentiment analysis conducted with X’s Grok AI, the report evaluates crypto community reactions to recent airdrops.major failures include last-minute changes and unclear eligibility

報告使用X的Grok AI進行的情感分析，該報告評估了加密社區對最近的Airdrops的反應。Major失敗包括最後一刻的更改和不清楚的資格

The Binance Research report identifies several common mistakes that have damaged community trust in airdrops.

Binance研究報告確定了幾個常見錯誤，這些錯誤損害了社區對空投的信任。

One of the most problematic practices is reducing community token allocations shortly before distribution.

最有問題的做法之一是在分發前不久減少社區令牌分配。

The report cites Redstone’s March 2025 airdrop as an example, where the team cut the community allocation from 9.5% to 5% at the last minute, triggering “significant community backlash.” It further notes,

該報告引用了雷德斯通（Redstone）2025年3月的AIRDROP為例，該團隊在最後一刻將社區分配從9.5％降低到5％，引發了“重大社區的強烈反對”。它進一步指出，

“Last minute changes to token allocations may result in discontent amongst a project’s community. They may also signal a lack of thought and planning, which could undermine the community’s trust in the project team.”

“對令牌分配的最後一分鐘變化可能會導致項目社區之間的不滿。它們也可能表明缺乏思想和計劃，這可能會破壞社區對項目團隊的信任。”

Another recurring issue involves unclear eligibility criteria that lead to “uneven rewards that don’t necessarily reflect user activity.”

另一個經常出現的問題涉及不清楚的資格標準，導致“不一定反映用戶活動的不均值”。

The report points to Scroll’s October 2024 airdrop, which distributed 7% of its total supply but faced criticism for “arbitrary snapshot and hidden rules.”

該報告指向Scroll於2024年10月的Airdrop，該卷獎分配了其總供應量的7％，但面臨“任意快照和隱藏規則”的批評。

Insider-heavy distributions also received criticism, with Kaito’s February 2025 airdrop highlighted for allocating 43.3% to team/investors and only 10% to the community.

內部人士繁重的分銷也受到了批評，凱托（Kaito）2025年2月的Airdrop強調了將43.3％的團隊/投資者分配給社區的10％。

The report also notes concerns about large allocations to influencers who “may choose to sell immediately, diluting the value for genuine users.”

該報告還指出，人們對“可能選擇立即銷售，稀釋真正用戶的價值”的有影響力者的大量分配擔憂。”

The report adds that airdrops with broad token distribution and a focus on community engagement, such as Pudgy Penguins and Hyperliquid, drew the most favorable reactions from users.

該報告補充說，具有廣泛的代幣分佈和關注社區參與的空氣流量，例如矮胖的企鵝和超流動，吸引了用戶最有利的反應。

In a collaboration with X’s Grok AI, Binance Research analyzed social media feedback on notable token distributions from the past year.

在與X的Grok AI合作中，Binance Research分析了社交媒體對過去一年中著名分佈的反饋。

The resulting sentiment scores, ranging from 1-10, provide insights into what factors contribute to positive community reception.

由1-10的人的情感得分提供了有關哪些因素有助於積極社區接待的洞察力。

Pudgy Penguins achieved the highest sentiment score (10) for its December 2024 airdrop.

矮胖的企鵝在2024年12月的空投中獲得了最高的情感得分（10）。

The report also noted that “community expectations were largely met” and a “high percentage of token supply went to Pudgy Penguin NFT holders.”

該報告還指出，“社區的期望得到了很大的滿足”，“代幣的供應量很高，供應質量很高。”

Hyperliquid followed closely with a score of 9, praised for its approach of heavily rewarding “early adopters of the protocol.”

超級流動的緊隨其後，得分為9，以其重大獎勵的“協議的早期採用者”而受到讚揚。

Other well-received airdrops included Berachain (8), ZKsync (8), and Grass (8), with common factors being strong community support, clear allocation rules, and appropriate rewards for early ecosystem participants.

其他廣受歡迎的空投包括Berachain（8），Zksync（8）和Grass（8），共同因素是社區支持，明確的分配規則以及早期生態系統參與者的適當獎勵。

In contrast, projects with the lowest sentiment scores included Redstone (2) and Scroll (3), with criticisms focusing on last-minute allocation changes and perceptions of excessive airdrop farming.

相比之下，情感得分最低的項目包括紅石（2）和捲軸（3），批評著重於最後一刻的分配變化和對過度氣管耕作的看法。

Recommendations For Improving Future Token Distributions

改善未來令牌分佈的建議

Binance Research offers three primary recommendations for projects trying to improve their airdrop processes.

Binance Research為試圖改善其空調過程的項目提供了三個主要建議。

One is increasing focus and transparency, improving community involvement, and implementing better monitoring tools to prevent exploitation.

一種是越來越多的焦點和透明度，改善社區參與，並實施更好的監視工具以防止剝削。

For transparency improvements, the report distinguishes between approaches suitable for different airdrop types.

為了提高透明度，該報告區分了適合不同氣流類型的方法。

With Retroactive Airdrops, projects should “ensure distribution metrics are clearly communicated to user bases before airdrops are made claimable” and maintain continuous communication to align community expectations with project goals.

借助追溯氣動器，項目應“確保在使空投聲明之前清楚地將分銷指標清楚地傳達給用戶群”，並保持持續的溝通以使社區期望與項目目標保持一致。

For Engagement Airdrops, the recommendation is to “provide airdrop distribution metrics as clearly as possible” and “avoid making changes once publicly published.”

對於參與空調，建議是“盡可能清楚地提供空調分銷指標”，並“避免在公開發布後進行更改”。

The report acknowledges the growing threat of “sybil farming” where users create multiple accounts to maximize airdrop rewards.

該報告承認，“ Sybil耕作”的威脅日益增長，用戶創建了多個帳戶以最大程度地提高氣流獎勵。

It cites projects like LayerZero that have worked with on-chain analytics firms to identify and disqualify farmers from receiving tokens.

它引用了諸如LoyeZero之類的項目，這些項目曾與鏈上分析公司合作，以識別和取消農民獲得代幣的資格。

Looking toward the future, Binance Research expresses optimism that as monitoring tools improve and become more widely available, “unwanted airdrop farming activity should trend to zero.”

展望未來，Binance Research表示樂觀，隨著監視工具的改善並變得更加廣泛，“不必要的空調耕作活動應趨於零。”