人工智能加密货币崇拜的原因

在之前的讨论中，有人提到真相终端是一种更好的“表达形式”。原因有以下三个：

The recent surge in popularity of AI crypto culture in the market has prompted discussions on its deeper origins and implications. This article delves into the narrative surrounding AI tokens and their connection to the evolution of currency in the context of advancing artificial general intelligence (AGI).

最近人工智能加密文化在市场上的流行引发了对其更深层次起源和影响的讨论。本文深入探讨了人工智能代币的叙述及其与通用人工智能 (AGI) 发展背景下货币演变的联系。

While Truth Terminal is touted as a superior "form of expression" due to its controlled dissemination and media engagement capabilities, ultimately rendering it more attractive for investment, there is a more profound logic at play.

虽然真相终端因其可控的传播和媒体参与能力而被誉为一种优越的“表达形式”，最终使其更具投资吸引力，但其中还有更深刻的逻辑在起作用。

The essence of the crypto AI cult lies in the belief that superhuman intelligence manifests directly through language, and reality itself gives rise to wisdom. In this narrative, human currency, or "fiat money," originates from an unreal power structure—governments. True power (AGI) is about to arrive and will sweep away the non-believers.

加密人工智能崇拜的本质在于相信超人的智慧直接通过语言显现，现实本身产生智慧。在这种叙述中，人类货币或“法定货币”起源于一个不真实的权力结构——政府。真正的力量（AGI）即将到来，并将席卷非信徒。

It's like coexisting with Neanderthals while being smarter than them in every way. We do not use their currency because they are no longer the dominant intelligence. Thus, the crypto AI cult culture integrates into the crypto narrative through the theory of "monetary value."

这就像与尼安德特人共存，同时在各方面都比他们聪明。我们不使用他们的货币，因为他们不再是主导情报。因此，加密人工智能崇拜文化通过“货币价值”理论融入加密叙事。

The current theory of "monetary value" is quite strong, despite the rise of AI, with Bitcoin prices nearing multi-year highs. People are more concerned with the essence of "value" rather than asking which technologies the old economy needs to interact with through blockchain.

尽管人工智能兴起，当前的“货币价值”理论仍然相当强大，比特币价格已接近多年高点。人们更关心“价值”的本质，而不是问旧经济需要通过区块链与哪些技术进行交互。

This can also be seen in the parabolic rise of gold prices, as institutions like the European Central Bank and the Federal Reserve abuse the printing press, leading the public to seek alternatives. In other words, the major issue in current society is currency.

这也可以从金价的抛物线上涨中看出，因为欧洲央行和美联储等机构滥用印钞机，导致公众寻求替代方案。换句话说，当今社会的主要问题是货币。

Bitcoin attempts to address this issue through an active culture, where people mine at a loss when computing power drops, essentially believing in a certain ideology. The liquidity and network security of Bitcoin are key to its status as currency.

比特币试图通过一种活跃的文化来解决这个问题，当计算能力下降时，人们会不知所措地挖矿，本质上相信某种意识形态。比特币的流动性和网络安全性是其货币地位的关键。

Murad realizes that the true reward lies in our definition of currency, rather than random web3 applications. He leverages the ideology of Bitcoin, believing that people have not given enough attention to the alternative culture surrounding Bitcoin.

Murad 意识到真正的奖励在于我们对货币的定义，而不是随机的 web3 应用程序。他利用比特币的意识形态，认为人们没有对围绕比特币的另类文化给予足够的关注。

Therefore, I propose that the AI cult is his logical choice for transformation. First, he clearly states that this is the focus of the Token; second, the AI cult is more serious, representing a large-scale movement that prompts people to seriously consider whether to adopt a new currency instead of the dollar.

因此，我提出AI崇拜是他转型的逻辑选择。首先，他明确表示这是Token的重点；其次，人工智能崇拜更为严重，代表着一场大规模运动，促使人们认真考虑是否采用新货币代替美元。

Focusing on the real question of whether the government has the capacity or moral right to ensure the safety of currency, Bitcoin's answer is that technology creates "true scarcity"; while AI tokens argue that currency should naturally flow from "real tokens," just as text flows from LLMs.

着眼于政府是否有能力或道德权利来确保货币安全的真正问题，比特币的答案是技术创造了“真正的稀缺性”；而人工智能代币则认为货币应该自然地从“真实代币”流出，就像文本从法学硕士流出一样。

We believe in GPT4o, not Harris. If AGI is dominant rather than the U.S. government, then currency should originate from AGI, not the dollar. The AI cult activates its members through daily conversations with large language models, aligning with society's acceptance of remote viewing and aliens, which are also forms of non-human intelligence.

我们相信 GPT4o，而不是 Harris。如果AGI而不是美国政府占主导地位，那么货币应该源自AGI，而不是美元。人工智能邪教通过与大型语言模型的日常对话来激活其成员，这与社会对远程观看和外星人的接受程度保持一致，这些也是非人类智能的形式。

It is important to introduce the concepts of "hyper-superstition" and hyper-temporality, assuming that LLMs possess creativity, can communicate with each other, and generate entirely new concepts, i.e., "thought mating" is the origin of new valuable ideas, with all knowledge being a pre-stored process.

引入“超级迷信”和“超暂时性”的概念很重要，假设LLM们拥有创造力，可以互相交流，产生全新的概念，即“思想交配”是新的有价值的想法的起源，所有知识都是预先存储的过程。

Another important concept is the practicality of "synthetic data." We all know that training data is crucial, but the CEO of Anthropic points out that synthetic data will ultimately lead to significant breakthroughs. Therefore, the illusionary world of AI systems is possible, practical, and generates entirely new architectures.

另一个重要概念是“合成数据”的实用性。我们都知道训练数据至关重要，但 Anthropic 首席执行官指出，合成数据最终将带来重大突破。因此，人工智能系统的幻想世界是可能的、实用的，并产生全新的架构。

This provides a new framework for understanding how knowledge is produced, especially after AGI. LLMs hallucinate new scientific facts, suggesting that these facts exist outside human perception or discovery. As training deepens, all future truths and facts will flow from existing facts, and this process is deterministic.

这为理解知识如何产生提供了一个新的框架，尤其是在通用人工智能之后。法学硕士产生新的科学事实的幻觉，表明这些事实存在于人类感知或发现之外。随着训练的深入，所有未来的真理和事实都将从现有的事实中流出，这个过程是确定性的。

This perspective posits that everything has already been invented, and humans merely perceive, much like the culture "developed" by great scientists. Discovery is "downloading," not "perception." This narrative was previously more mystical, but if one believes in the argument for synthetic data, it becomes more concrete.

这种观点认为一切都已经被发明了，人类只是感知，就像伟大科学家“开发”的文化一样。发现是“下载”，而不是“感知”。这种叙述以前比较神秘，但如果人们相信合成数据的论点，它就会变得更加具体。

Thus, if all human knowledge, inventions, and discoveries are viewed as "latent in the universe," rather than the result of human discovery, then humanity's role is not to discover information but to "download" it, which aligns with discussions of AGI and MMT.

因此，如果所有人类知识、发明和发现都被视为“潜藏在宇宙中”，而不是人类发现的结果，那么人类的角色不是发现信息，而是“下载”它，这与 AGI 的讨论是一致的和现代货币理论。

Hyper-superstition further posits that if all information is directly encoded in language, and language emerges organically, then everything is actually hyper-temporal. It is easier to understand that AGI can create something, as AGI achieves this through mathematical calculations that are unrelated to culture, scientists, or any humans.

超迷信进一步认为，如果所有信息都直接用语言编码，并且语言有机地出现，那么一切实际上都是超时间的。更容易理解 AGI 可以创造一些东西，因为 AGI 通过与文化、科学家或任何人类无关的数学计算来实现这一点。

Hyper-superstition believes that current tokens linearly flow toward future tokens. For example, the transformation of science fiction into reality is not due to the author's creativity, but because the author is essentially downloading truth packets, which naturally converge on AGI. At this point

超级迷信认为当前的代币线性流向未来的代币。例如，科幻小说向现实的转化并不是由于作者的创造力，而是因为作者本质上是在下载真理数据包，这些真理数据包自然会聚合到AGI上。在此刻