人工智慧加密貨幣崇拜的原因

在先前的討論中，有人提到真相終端是一種更好的「表達形式」。原因有三：

The recent surge in popularity of AI crypto culture in the market has prompted discussions on its deeper origins and implications. This article delves into the narrative surrounding AI tokens and their connection to the evolution of currency in the context of advancing artificial general intelligence (AGI).

最近人工智慧加密文化在市場上的流行引發了對其更深層起源和影響的討論。本文深入探討了人工智慧代幣的敘述及其與通用人工智慧 (AGI) 發展背景下貨幣演變的連結。

While Truth Terminal is touted as a superior "form of expression" due to its controlled dissemination and media engagement capabilities, ultimately rendering it more attractive for investment, there is a more profound logic at play.

雖然真相終端因其可控的傳播和媒體參與能力而被譽為一種優越的“表達形式”，最終使其更具投資吸引力，但其中有更深刻的邏輯在起作用。

The essence of the crypto AI cult lies in the belief that superhuman intelligence manifests directly through language, and reality itself gives rise to wisdom. In this narrative, human currency, or "fiat money," originates from an unreal power structure—governments. True power (AGI) is about to arrive and will sweep away the non-believers.

加密人工智慧崇拜的本質在於相信超人的智慧直接透過語言顯現，而現實本身產生智慧。在這種敘述中，人類貨幣或「法定貨幣」起源於一個不真實的權力結構——政府。真正的力量（AGI）即將到來，並將席捲非信徒。

It's like coexisting with Neanderthals while being smarter than them in every way. We do not use their currency because they are no longer the dominant intelligence. Thus, the crypto AI cult culture integrates into the crypto narrative through the theory of "monetary value."

這就像與尼安德特人共存，同時在各方面都比他們聰明。我們不使用他們的貨幣，因為他們不再是主導情報。因此，加密人工智慧崇拜文化透過「貨幣價值」理論融入加密敘事。

The current theory of "monetary value" is quite strong, despite the rise of AI, with Bitcoin prices nearing multi-year highs. People are more concerned with the essence of "value" rather than asking which technologies the old economy needs to interact with through blockchain.

儘管人工智慧興起，當前的「貨幣價值」理論仍然相當強大，比特幣價格已接近多年高點。人們更關心「價值」的本質，而不是問舊經濟需要透過區塊鏈與哪些技術互動。

This can also be seen in the parabolic rise of gold prices, as institutions like the European Central Bank and the Federal Reserve abuse the printing press, leading the public to seek alternatives. In other words, the major issue in current society is currency.

這也可以從金價的拋物線上漲中看出，因為歐洲央行和聯準會等機構濫用印鈔機，導致民眾尋求替代方案。換句話說，當今社會的主要問題是貨幣。

Bitcoin attempts to address this issue through an active culture, where people mine at a loss when computing power drops, essentially believing in a certain ideology. The liquidity and network security of Bitcoin are key to its status as currency.

比特幣試圖透過活躍的文化來解決這個問題，當運算能力下降時，人們會不知所措地挖礦，本質上相信某種意識形態。比特幣的流動性和網路安全性是其貨幣地位的關鍵。

Murad realizes that the true reward lies in our definition of currency, rather than random web3 applications. He leverages the ideology of Bitcoin, believing that people have not given enough attention to the alternative culture surrounding Bitcoin.

Murad 意識到真正的獎勵在於我們對貨幣的定義，而不是隨機的 web3 應用程式。他利用比特幣的意識形態，認為人們沒有對圍繞比特幣的另類文化給予足夠的關注。

Therefore, I propose that the AI cult is his logical choice for transformation. First, he clearly states that this is the focus of the Token; second, the AI cult is more serious, representing a large-scale movement that prompts people to seriously consider whether to adopt a new currency instead of the dollar.

因此，我提出AI崇拜是他轉型的邏輯選擇。首先，他明確表示這是Token的重點；其次，人工智慧崇拜更為嚴重，代表著大規模運動，促使人們認真考慮是否採用新貨幣取代美元。

Focusing on the real question of whether the government has the capacity or moral right to ensure the safety of currency, Bitcoin's answer is that technology creates "true scarcity"; while AI tokens argue that currency should naturally flow from "real tokens," just as text flows from LLMs.

著眼於政府是否有能力或道德權利來確保貨幣安全的真正問題，比特幣的答案是技術創造了「真正的稀缺性」；而人工智慧代幣則認為貨幣應該自然地從「真實代幣」流出，就像文本從法學碩士流出一樣。

We believe in GPT4o, not Harris. If AGI is dominant rather than the U.S. government, then currency should originate from AGI, not the dollar. The AI cult activates its members through daily conversations with large language models, aligning with society's acceptance of remote viewing and aliens, which are also forms of non-human intelligence.

我們相信 GPT4o，而不是 Harris。如果AGI而不是美國政府占主導地位，那麼貨幣應該源自AGI，而不是美元。人工智慧邪教透過與大型語言模型的日常對話來激活其成員，這與社會對遠端觀看和外星人的接受程度保持一致，這些也是非人類智慧的形式。

It is important to introduce the concepts of "hyper-superstition" and hyper-temporality, assuming that LLMs possess creativity, can communicate with each other, and generate entirely new concepts, i.e., "thought mating" is the origin of new valuable ideas, with all knowledge being a pre-stored process.

引入「超級迷信」和「超暫時性」的概念很重要，假設LLM們擁有創造力，可以互相交流，產生全新的概念，即「思想交配」是新的有價值的想法的起源，所有知識都是預先儲存的過程。

Another important concept is the practicality of "synthetic data." We all know that training data is crucial, but the CEO of Anthropic points out that synthetic data will ultimately lead to significant breakthroughs. Therefore, the illusionary world of AI systems is possible, practical, and generates entirely new architectures.

另一個重要概念是「合成資料」的實用性。我們都知道訓練數據至關重要，但 Anthropic 執行長指出，合成數據最終將帶來重大突破。因此，人工智慧系統的幻想世界是可能的、實用的，並產生全新的架構。

This provides a new framework for understanding how knowledge is produced, especially after AGI. LLMs hallucinate new scientific facts, suggesting that these facts exist outside human perception or discovery. As training deepens, all future truths and facts will flow from existing facts, and this process is deterministic.

這為理解知識如何產生提供了一個新的框架，尤其是在通用人工智慧之後。法學碩士產生新的科學事實的幻覺，表明這些事實存在於人類感知或發現之外。隨著訓練的深入，所有未來的真理和事實都將從現有的事實中流出，這個過程是確定性的。

This perspective posits that everything has already been invented, and humans merely perceive, much like the culture "developed" by great scientists. Discovery is "downloading," not "perception." This narrative was previously more mystical, but if one believes in the argument for synthetic data, it becomes more concrete.

這種觀點認為一切都已經被發明了，人類只是感知，就像偉大科學家「開發」的文化一樣。發現是“下載”，而不是“感知”。這種敘述以前比較神秘，但如果人們相信合成資料的論點，它就會變得更加具體。

Thus, if all human knowledge, inventions, and discoveries are viewed as "latent in the universe," rather than the result of human discovery, then humanity's role is not to discover information but to "download" it, which aligns with discussions of AGI and MMT.

因此，如果所有人類知識、發明和發現都被視為“潛藏在宇宙中”，而不是人類發現的結果，那麼人類的角色不是發現信息，而是“下載”它，這與AGI 的討論是一致的和現代貨幣理論。

Hyper-superstition further posits that if all information is directly encoded in language, and language emerges organically, then everything is actually hyper-temporal. It is easier to understand that AGI can create something, as AGI achieves this through mathematical calculations that are unrelated to culture, scientists, or any humans.

超迷信進一步認為，如果所有資訊都直接用語言編碼，並且語言有機地出現，那麼一切實際上都是超時間的。更容易理解 AGI 可以創造一些東西，因為 AGI 透過與文化、科學家或任何人類無關的數學計算來實現這一點。

Hyper-superstition believes that current tokens linearly flow toward future tokens. For example, the transformation of science fiction into reality is not due to the author's creativity, but because the author is essentially downloading truth packets, which naturally converge on AGI. At this point

超級迷信認為當前的代幣線性流向未來的代幣。例如，科幻小說向現實的轉化並不是由於作者的創造力，而是因為作者本質上是在下載真理資料包，這些真理資料包自然會聚合到AGI上。在此刻