Tron 基金會尋求駁回 SEC 證券訴訟

Tron 區塊鏈背後的實體Tron 基金會已提出動議，駁回美國證券交易委員會(SEC) 提起的訴訟，認為SEC 對該平台主要在海外進行的業務缺乏管轄權，並且其代幣銷售不符合美國證券交易委員會(SEC) 的管轄權。未註冊的證券發行。

Tron Foundation Motion to Dismiss SEC Securities Lawsuit

Tron 基金會駁回 SEC 證券訴訟的動議

March 28, 2023

2023 年 3 月 28 日

Introduction

介紹

Tron Foundation, the entity behind the Tron blockchain network, has filed a motion to dismiss a securities lawsuit brought against it by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The motion, filed on March 28, 2023, argues that the SEC lacks jurisdiction over the alleged conduct and that the Tron token (TRX) and BitTorrent token (BTT) are not securities.

Tron 區塊鏈網路背後的實體 Tron 基金會已提交動議，駁回美國證券交易委員會 (SEC) 對其提起的證券訴訟。該動議於 2023 年 3 月 28 日提交，認為 SEC 對所指控的行為缺乏管轄權，並且 Tron 代幣 (TRX) 和 BitTorrent 代幣 (BTT) 不是證券。

Background

背景

In March 2023, the SEC filed a lawsuit against Tron Foundation, its founder Justin Sun, the Bittorrent foundation, and Bittorent's parent company, Rainberry Inc. The lawsuit alleged that the defendants violated federal securities laws by conducting unregistered securities offerings of TRX and BTT.

2023年3月，SEC對波場基金會、其創始人孫宇晨、Bittorrent基金會以及Bittorrent母公司Rainberry Inc提起訴訟。訴訟稱，被告進行未經註冊的TRX和BTT證券發行，違反了聯邦證券法。

Arguments for Dismissal

駁回理由

Tron Foundation's motion to dismiss rests on several key arguments:

Tron 基金會的駁回動議是基於幾個關鍵論點：

• Lack of SEC Jurisdiction: The motion contends that the SEC has no authority to regulate the conduct alleged in the lawsuit because it did not occur in the United States. Tron Foundation argues that the token sales were conducted entirely overseas and that the SEC has no jurisdiction over foreign companies or transactions.
• Tokens Not Securities: The motion asserts that TRX and BTT are not securities under the Howey test, a legal framework used by the Supreme Court to determine whether a transaction constitutes an investment contract. Tron Foundation argues that the tokens do not represent an investment in a common enterprise with the expectation of profits from the efforts of others.
• Lack of Specificity: Tron Foundation alleges that the SEC's lawsuit is vague and lacks sufficient detail. It argues that the SEC has not identified any specific victims of the alleged wrongdoing or provided evidence to support its claims of manipulative wash trading.

Procedural History

缺乏 SEC 管轄權：該動議認為 SEC 無權監管訴訟中指控的行為，因為該行為並未發生在美國。 Tron 基金會辯稱，代幣銷售完全在海外進行，SEC 對外國公司或交易沒有管轄權。代幣不是證券：該動議聲稱 TRX 和 BTT 不是 Howey 測試（最高使用的法律框架）下的證券法院判定交易是否構成投資合約。 Tron 基金會辯稱，這些代幣並不代表對普通企業的投資，並期望從他人的努力中獲利。缺乏具體性： Tron 基金會聲稱 SEC 的訴訟含糊不清，缺乏足夠的細節。它辯稱，美國證券交易委員會尚未確定涉嫌不當行為的任何具體受害者，也沒有提供證據來支持其操縱清洗交易的主張。程序歷史

The SEC is expected to file a response to Tron Foundation's motion to dismiss within the next several weeks. The court will then consider the arguments of both parties before ruling on the motion.

美國證券交易委員會預計將在未來幾週內對波場基金會的駁回動議做出回應。法院隨後將考慮雙方的論點，然後再對動議作出裁決。

Legal Implications

法律影響

The outcome of this lawsuit will have significant implications for the regulation of cryptocurrencies in the United States. A dismissal of the lawsuit would suggest that the SEC lacks authority to regulate foreign cryptocurrency companies and that tokens like TRX and BTT may not be considered securities under U.S. law. Conversely, a successful SEC prosecution could establish a precedent for the regulation of cryptocurrencies and token sales.

該訴訟的結果將對美國加密貨幣的監管產生重大影響。駁回訴訟將表明 SEC 缺乏監管外國加密貨幣公司的權力，根據美國法律，TRX 和 BTT 等代幣可能不被視為證券。相反，美國證券交易委員會的成功起訴可以為加密貨幣和代幣銷售的監管樹立先例。

Conclusion

結論

Tron Foundation's motion to dismiss the SEC's securities lawsuit is a significant development in the ongoing legal battle between the cryptocurrency industry and U.S. regulators. The outcome of this case will likely shape the future of cryptocurrency regulation in the United States and beyond.

Tron 基金會駁回 SEC 證券訴訟的動議是加密貨幣產業與美國監管機構之間持續法律鬥爭的重大進展。此案的結果可能會影響美國及其他地區加密貨幣監管的未來。