Tron 基金会寻求驳回 SEC 证券诉讼

Tron 区块链背后的实体 Tron 基金会已提出动议，驳回美国证券交易委员会 (SEC) 提起的诉讼，认为 SEC 对该平台主要在海外进行的业务缺乏管辖权，并且其代币销售不符合美国证券交易委员会 (SEC) 的管辖权。未注册的证券发行。

Tron Foundation Motion to Dismiss SEC Securities Lawsuit

Tron 基金会驳回 SEC 证券诉讼的动议

March 28, 2023

2023 年 3 月 28 日

Introduction

介绍

Tron Foundation, the entity behind the Tron blockchain network, has filed a motion to dismiss a securities lawsuit brought against it by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The motion, filed on March 28, 2023, argues that the SEC lacks jurisdiction over the alleged conduct and that the Tron token (TRX) and BitTorrent token (BTT) are not securities.

Tron 区块链网络背后的实体 Tron 基金会已提交动议，驳回美国证券交易委员会 (SEC) 对其提起的证券诉讼。该动议于 2023 年 3 月 28 日提交，认为 SEC 对所指控的行为缺乏管辖权，并且 Tron 代币 (TRX) 和 BitTorrent 代币 (BTT) 不是证券。

Background

背景

In March 2023, the SEC filed a lawsuit against Tron Foundation, its founder Justin Sun, the Bittorrent foundation, and Bittorent's parent company, Rainberry Inc. The lawsuit alleged that the defendants violated federal securities laws by conducting unregistered securities offerings of TRX and BTT.

2023年3月，SEC对波场基金会、其创始人孙宇晨、Bittorrent基金会以及Bittorrent母公司Rainberry Inc提起诉讼。诉讼称，被告进行未经注册的TRX和BTT证券发行，违反了联邦证券法。

Arguments for Dismissal

驳回理由

Tron Foundation's motion to dismiss rests on several key arguments:

Tron 基金会的驳回动议基于几个关键论点：

• Lack of SEC Jurisdiction: The motion contends that the SEC has no authority to regulate the conduct alleged in the lawsuit because it did not occur in the United States. Tron Foundation argues that the token sales were conducted entirely overseas and that the SEC has no jurisdiction over foreign companies or transactions.
• Tokens Not Securities: The motion asserts that TRX and BTT are not securities under the Howey test, a legal framework used by the Supreme Court to determine whether a transaction constitutes an investment contract. Tron Foundation argues that the tokens do not represent an investment in a common enterprise with the expectation of profits from the efforts of others.
• Lack of Specificity: Tron Foundation alleges that the SEC's lawsuit is vague and lacks sufficient detail. It argues that the SEC has not identified any specific victims of the alleged wrongdoing or provided evidence to support its claims of manipulative wash trading.

Procedural History

缺乏 SEC 管辖权：该动议认为 SEC 无权监管诉讼中指控的行为，因为该行为并未发生在美国。 Tron 基金会辩称，代币销售完全在海外进行，SEC 对外国公司或交易没有管辖权。 代币不是证券：该动议声称 TRX 和 BTT 不是 Howey 测试（最高使用的法律框架）下的证券法院判定交易是否构成投资合同。 Tron 基金会辩称，这些代币并不代表对普通企业的投资，并期望从他人的努力中获利。 缺乏具体性：Tron 基金会声称 SEC 的诉讼含糊不清，缺乏足够的细节。它辩称，美国证券交易委员会尚未确定涉嫌不当行为的任何具体受害者，也没有提供证据来支持其操纵清洗交易的主张。 程序历史

The SEC is expected to file a response to Tron Foundation's motion to dismiss within the next several weeks. The court will then consider the arguments of both parties before ruling on the motion.

预计美国证券交易委员会将在未来几周内对波场基金会的驳回动议做出回应。法院随后将考虑双方的论点，然后再对动议作出裁决。

Legal Implications

法律影响

The outcome of this lawsuit will have significant implications for the regulation of cryptocurrencies in the United States. A dismissal of the lawsuit would suggest that the SEC lacks authority to regulate foreign cryptocurrency companies and that tokens like TRX and BTT may not be considered securities under U.S. law. Conversely, a successful SEC prosecution could establish a precedent for the regulation of cryptocurrencies and token sales.

该诉讼的结果将对美国加密货币的监管产生重大影响。驳回诉讼将表明 SEC 缺乏监管外国加密货币公司的权力，并且根据美国法律，TRX 和 BTT 等代币可能不被视为证券。相反，美国证券交易委员会的成功起诉可以为加密货币和代币销售的监管树立先例。

Conclusion

结论

Tron Foundation's motion to dismiss the SEC's securities lawsuit is a significant development in the ongoing legal battle between the cryptocurrency industry and U.S. regulators. The outcome of this case will likely shape the future of cryptocurrency regulation in the United States and beyond.

Tron 基金会驳回 SEC 证券诉讼的动议是加密货币行业与美国监管机构之间持续法律斗争的重大进展。此案的结果可能会影响美国及其他地区加密货币监管的未来。