Tron 基金會在法庭上無視 SEC 指控，挑戰監管過度

Tron 基金會已提出動議，駁回 SEC 提起的訴訟，質疑 SEC 對其數位代幣銷售的管轄權。 Tron 辯稱，其銷售是在美國境外向非美國居民進行的，因此不屬於 SEC 的監管權限。

Tron Foundation Boldly Challenges SEC's Allegations in Court

Tron 基金會在法庭上大膽挑戰 SEC 的指控

In a landmark legal battle that could reshape the regulatory landscape for digital assets, the Tron Foundation has filed a motion to dismiss the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's (SEC) lawsuit against it. The foundation argues that the SEC overstepped its authority by attempting to regulate its token sales, which it contends were conducted outside the United States.

在一場可能重塑數位資產監管格局的具有里程碑意義的法律戰中，Tron 基金會已提出動議，駁回美國證券交易委員會 (SEC) 對其提起的訴訟。該基金會認為，美國證券交易委員會試圖監管其代幣銷售，這是越權行為，該基金會聲稱代幣銷售是在美國境外進行的。

Tron's motion for dismissal, filed in a New York federal court, asserts that the SEC lacks jurisdiction over transactions that take place on global platforms and involve foreign buyers. The foundation maintains that its token sales were conducted outside the United States and targeted non-U.S. residents, thus falling outside the SEC's regulatory purview.

Tron 向紐約聯邦法院提交的駁回動議聲稱，美國證券交易委員會對全球平台上發生的涉及外國買家的交易缺乏管轄權。該基金會堅稱其代幣銷售是在美國境外進行的，並且針對的是非美國居民，因此不屬於 SEC 的監管範圍。

"The SEC's overreach in this case is a dangerous precedent that threatens to stifle innovation and impede the growth of the global digital asset market," Tron's attorneys argue. They emphasize the lack of concrete evidence presented by the SEC to support its allegations and warn that allowing the agency's expansive interpretation of its jurisdiction to stand would have a chilling effect on the industry.

Tron 的律師辯稱：“美國證券交易委員會在本案中的越權行為是一個危險的先例，有可能扼殺創新並阻礙​​全球數位資產市場的成長。”他們強調，美國證券交易委員會缺乏具體證據來支持其指控，並警告說，允許該機構對其管轄權進行廣泛的解釋，將對產業產生寒蟬效應。

Tron also challenges the SEC's classification of its tokens as investment contracts under U.S. securities laws, arguing that they do not meet the requisite criteria. The foundation contends that its tokens are functional utility tokens used to access its blockchain ecosystem, not investments with the expectation of profit.

Tron 也對美國證券交易委員會將其代幣歸類為美國證券法下的投資合約提出質疑，認為這些代幣不符合必要的標準。該基金會辯稱，其代幣是用於訪問其區塊鏈生態系統的功能性實用代幣，而不是期望利潤的投資。

Furthermore, Tron disputes the SEC's claims that its CEO, Justin Sun, and celebrity endorsers like Soulja Boy and Akon engaged in manipulative trading. The foundation argues that the SEC has failed to provide specific evidence of wrongdoing or identify any victims harmed by the alleged misconduct.

此外，波場對美國證券交易委員會關於其執行長孫宇晨以及 Soulja Boy 和 Akon 等名人代言人參與操縱交易的說法提出了質疑。該基金會辯稱，美國證券交易委員會未能提供不當行為的具體證據，也未能確定任何因涉嫌不當行為而受到傷害的受害者。

Tron's criticism extends to the SEC's reliance on generalizations and conclusions in its complaint, rather than providing detailed factual allegations. The foundation argues that the SEC's approach is unsupported by the law and undermines its credibility.

Tron 的批評延伸到 SEC 在投訴中依賴概括和結論，而不是提供詳細的事實指控。該基金會認為，美國證券交易委員會的做法不受法律支持，並損害了其可信度。

"The SEC's vague and unsubstantiated allegations are not enough to justify its sweeping enforcement action against Tron," Tron's attorneys assert. "The agency is attempting to expand its jurisdiction and impose its regulatory regime on activities that occur outside the United States, which is a violation of the law."

波場的律師斷言：“美國證券交易委員會模糊且未經證實的指控不足以證明其對波場採取全面執法行動的合理性。” “該機構試圖擴大其管轄範圍，並將其監管制度強加於美國境外發生的活動，這違反了法律。”

The SEC has two weeks to respond to Tron's motion for dismissal. The agency has not yet commented on the motion, but the industry is closely watching the case as it could have far-reaching implications for the regulation of digital assets.

美國證券交易委員會有兩週的時間對 Tron 的駁回動議做出回應。該機構尚未對該動議發表評論，但業界正在密切關注此案，因為它可能對數位資產的監管產生深遠的影響。

Tron's legal challenge is a bold statement against the SEC's overreach and a testament to the industry's determination to achieve clarity and legal certainty. The outcome of this case will shape the regulatory landscape for cryptocurrencies and determine the extent of the SEC's authority over foreign digital asset transactions. Investors, industry participants, and regulators alike are eagerly awaiting the court's decision, which could have a profound impact on the future of the digital asset ecosystem both within and beyond the United States.

Tron 的法律挑戰是針對 SEC 越權行為的大膽聲明，也證明了該行業實現透明度和法律確定性的決心。此案的結果將塑造加密貨幣的監管格局，並決定美國證券交易委員會對外國數位資產交易的權力範圍。投資者、產業參與者和監管機構都在熱切等待法院的裁決，這可能對美國國內外數位資產生態系統的未來產生深遠影響。