bitcoin
bitcoin

$75892.41 USD 

1.09%

ethereum
ethereum

$2901.17 USD 

2.94%

tether
tether

$1.00 USD 

0.06%

solana
solana

$199.71 USD 

5.61%

bnb
bnb

$595.84 USD 

-0.01%

usd-coin
usd-coin

$1.00 USD 

0.00%

xrp
xrp

$0.547649 USD 

-1.31%

dogecoin
dogecoin

$0.197756 USD 

2.19%

cardano
cardano

$0.425172 USD 

14.94%

tron
tron

$0.160991 USD 

-0.13%

toncoin
toncoin

$4.86 USD 

0.66%

shiba-inu
shiba-inu

$0.000019 USD 

0.43%

avalanche
avalanche

$27.46 USD 

1.43%

chainlink
chainlink

$12.74 USD 

3.09%

bitcoin-cash
bitcoin-cash

$371.58 USD 

-1.43%

加密貨幣新聞文章

Tron 在前所未有的加密貨幣案件中挑戰 SEC 權威

2024/04/02 00:30

Tron 在一場圍繞 TRX 和 BTT 證券分類的訴訟中對 SEC 的管轄權提出異議。 Tron 辯稱,SEC 對其海外業務缺乏管轄權,TRX 和 BTT 並未作為投資合約出售,而且 SEC 的行為違反了公平通知原則。此案例凸顯了明確的加密貨幣監管的必要性,以保護投資者、鼓勵創新並確保產業的可持續性。

Tron 在前所未有的加密貨幣案件中挑戰 SEC 權威

Tron Contests SEC's Authority in Landmark Cryptocurrency Case

Tron 在具有里程碑意義的加密貨幣案件中挑戰 SEC 的權威

Washington, D.C., March 30, 2023 - The cryptocurrency industry has been thrust into a legal vortex as Tron, a prominent blockchain network, staunchly refutes the jurisdiction of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The SEC's lawsuit against Tron, filed in March 2023, alleges deceptive practices, market manipulation, and fraud.

華盛頓特區,2023 年 3 月 30 日 - 隨著著名區塊鏈網路波場 (Tron) 堅決駁斥美國證券交易委員會 (SEC) 的管轄權,加密貨幣行業已陷入法律漩渦。美國證券交易委員會 (SEC) 於 2023 年 3 月對 Tron 提起訴訟,指控 Tron 有欺騙行為、市場操縱和詐欺行為。

Tron's Robust Defense

波場 (Tron) 的穩健防禦

Tron's legal team, in a comprehensive motion to dismiss filed on March 28, vehemently contests the SEC's authority to regulate their foreign operations and digital transactions. They argue that TRX and BTT, the digital assets at the heart of the lawsuit, do not constitute securities under the Howey Test, a benchmark used to determine whether an investment contract exists.

Tron 的法律團隊在 3 月 28 日提交的全面駁回動議中,強烈質疑 SEC 監管其海外業務和數位交易的權力。他們認為,訴訟核心的數位資產 TRX 和 BTT 不構成豪伊測試(用於確定投資合約是否存在的基準)下的證券。

Furthermore, Tron asserts that the SEC's attempt to extend its regulatory reach to global platforms and social media promotions exceeds its statutory authority. They contend that such activities do not directly involve U.S. markets or investors.

此外,Tron 聲稱 SEC 將其監管範圍擴大到全球平台和社交媒體促銷的嘗試超出了其法定權限。他們認為此類活動不直接涉及美國市場或投資者。

Tron Insists on Fair Play

Tron 堅持公平競爭

In a bold move, Tron cites the major questions doctrine, asserting that the SEC lacks the explicit congressional authorization necessary to expand its regulatory powers unilaterally into the digital asset space. They argue that the SEC's actions violate fair notice and due process principles due to the absence of clear regulatory guidance for cryptocurrencies.

Tron 採取了大膽的舉動,引用了重大問題原則,聲稱 SEC 缺乏單方面將其監管權力擴展到數位資產領域所需的明確國會授權。他們認為,由於缺乏針對加密貨幣的明確監管指導,美國證券交易委員會的行為違反了公平通知和正當程序原則。

The SEC's Allegations

美國證券交易委員會的指控

The SEC's lawsuit centers on Justin Sun, the enigmatic founder of Tron. The complaint alleges that Sun engaged in manipulative wash trading, artificially inflating TRX's trading volume through over 600,000 transactions between accounts under his control. This alleged scheme, the SEC contends, enabled Sun to generate a windfall of over $31 million from his token sale.

SEC 的訴訟集中在波場 (Tron) 的神秘創始人孫宇晨 (Justin Sun) 身上。起訴書稱,Sun 進行了操縱性清洗交易,透過其控制下的帳戶之間超過 60 萬筆交易人為地誇大了 TRX 的交易量。 SEC 認為,這項所謂的計劃使 Sun 從其代幣銷售中獲得了超過 3,100 萬美元的意外之財。

Celebrity Endorsements Under Scrutiny

名人代言受到密切關注

The SEC's complaint also implicates several high-profile celebrities, including Lindsay Lohan, Jake Paul, and Akon, who allegedly promoted TRX and BTT on social media without disclosing their compensation. The SEC charges that these actions misled the public and violated federal disclosure laws.

SEC 的投訴還涉及幾位知名名人,包括 Lindsay Lohan、Jake Paul 和 Akon,據稱他們在社交媒體上宣傳 TRX 和 BTT,但未透露其薪酬。美國證券交易委員會指控這些行為誤導公眾並違反聯邦披露法。

The Stakes of the Lawsuit

訴訟的利害關係

The legal battle between Tron and the SEC has garnered widespread attention within the cryptocurrency community. Critics, including Brian Armstrong, CEO of Coinbase, have raised concerns that the SEC's aggressive stance toward crypto companies could stifle innovation and drive the industry overseas.

Tron 與 SEC 之間的法律糾紛引起了加密貨幣界的廣泛關注。包括 Coinbase 執行長 Brian Armstrong 在內的批評人士擔心,美國證券交易委員會對加密貨幣公司的激進立場可能會扼殺創新並推動該行業走向海外。

Urgent Need for Clarity

迫切需要澄清

The Tron lawsuit highlights the pressing need for clear regulatory frameworks in the cryptocurrency sector. Uncertainties about the application of securities laws to digital assets create an environment ripe for misunderstandings and legal challenges.

Tron 訴訟凸顯了加密貨幣領域迫切需要明確的監管框架。證券法適用於數位資產的不確定性為誤解和法律挑戰創造了成熟的環境。

Implications for the Crypto Market

對加密貨幣市場的影響

The outcome of this landmark case will have profound implications for the long-term viability of the crypto market. It will establish precedents for how regulators treat digital assets and set the boundaries for industry conduct. Investors and market participants alike await the court's decision with bated breath, as it will determine the future trajectory of cryptocurrency regulation.

這項具有里程碑意義的案件的結果將對加密貨幣市場的長期生存產生深遠影響。它將為監管機構如何對待數位資產並設定行業行為界限樹立先例。投資者和市場參與者都屏息等待法院的裁決,因為它將決定加密貨幣監管的未來軌跡。

免責聲明:info@kdj.com

所提供的資訊並非交易建議。 kDJ.com對任何基於本文提供的資訊進行的投資不承擔任何責任。加密貨幣波動性較大,建議您充分研究後謹慎投資!

如果您認為本網站使用的內容侵犯了您的版權,請立即聯絡我們(info@kdj.com),我們將及時刪除。

2024年11月08日 其他文章發表於