Netflix 首播第二季未能給人留下深刻印象，魷魚遊戲代幣 (SQUID) 暴跌 83%

在 Squid Game 中面臨淘汰的不僅僅是參賽者。 《魷魚遊戲》第二季在 Netflix 首播後 24 小時內，魷魚遊戲代幣 (SQUID) 暴跌 83.16%

Squid Game Tokens (SQUID) have taken a nosedive, plunging by 83.16% within 24 hours of the Netflix debut of Squid Game Season 2. At the time of writing, the token was trading at $0.0001352. Over the past seven days, the token has lost 79.24% of its value.

Squid Game 代幣 (SQUID) 暴跌，在《Squid Game》第 2 季在 Netflix 首播後 24 小時內暴跌 83.16%。在過去 7 天裡，該代幣價值損失了 79.24%。

As the latest season of the show aimed to bring fresh intrigue, the fallout in the crypto space has been far from entertaining.

由於該劇的最新一季旨在帶來新的陰謀，加密貨幣領域的影響遠非娛樂性的。

Rug Pull or Plot Twist? SQUID Holders Cry Foul

地毯拉扯還是劇情扭曲？ SQUID持有者大喊冤屈

The collapse of Squid Game Tokens in the market has reignited debates on the perils of entertainment-driven cryptocurrencies. Prominent crypto commentator Satomi sounded the alarm, highlighting that insiders allegedly control 40% of SQUID’s supply. She likened the situation to a scripted rug pull, urging potential buyers to “always scan a token before buying it.”

Squid 遊戲代幣在市場上的崩盤重新引發了關於娛樂驅動型加密貨幣危險的爭論。著名加密貨幣評論員 Satomi 敲響了警鐘，強調內部人士據稱控制著 SQUID 40% 的供應量。她將這種情況比作有腳本的地毯拉動，敦促潛在買家「在購買之前始終掃描代幣」。

Another crypto enthusiast, Timothy shared his misadventure with a Squid Game-themed token. He described how developers dumped their holdings, causing the token to sink in value and leaving retail investors stranded. “The dev sold,” he posted, comparing the incident to a game where the odds were rigged from the outset. Timothy has since taken matters into his own hands by creating a new version of the token, adding, “Feel free to check it out.”

另一位加密貨幣愛好者 Timothy 分享了他與 Squid Game 主題代幣的不幸經歷。他描述了開發商如何拋售所持代幣，導致代幣價值下跌並讓散戶投資者陷入困境。 「開發者賣掉了，」他發文稱，將該事件比作一場從一開始就操縱賠率的遊戲。此後，蒂莫西親自創建了新版本的代幣，並補充道：“請隨意查看。”

This debacle highlights a recurring issue in crypto projects tied to pop culture. Hype can spark short-term market interest, but these projects often end in disaster without transparency and solid fundamentals.

這次災難凸顯了與流行文化相關的加密項目中反覆出現的問題。炒作可以激發短期市場興趣，但這些項目往往在缺乏透明度和堅實基礎的情況下以災難告終。

Season 2’s Criticism Mirrors SQUID’s Market Slump

第二季的批評反映了 SQUID 的市場低迷

Squid Game Season 2 opened with Lee Jung-jae returning to the screen as Seong Gi-hun. While his performance drew praise, critics pointed out repetitive plot twists and familiar character arcs. Efforts to expand the narrative outside the arena introduced new villains and storylines but struggled to distance themselves from the first season.

《烏賊遊戲》第二季開場，李正宰以成基勳的身份回歸銀幕。雖然他的表演受到讚揚，但評論家指出了重複的情節曲折和熟悉的人物弧線。將敘事擴展到競技場之外的努力引入了新的反派和故事情節，但仍難以與第一季保持距離。

Much like the show’s reception, SQUID token holders also showed little interest as many exited the show. The token’s market activity also declined, reflecting reduced interest following the Season 2 release.

就像節目的接待一樣，SQUID 代幣持有者也沒有表現出任何興趣，因為許多人退出了節目。該代幣的市場活動也有所下降，反映出第二季發布後興趣的減少。

The crash of Squid Game Token exposes the dangers of entertainment-linked cryptocurrencies. Insider control and lack of transparency leave retail investors vulnerable to losses, as Satomi’s warning about insiders holding 40% of the token supply demonstrates.

Squid Game Token 的崩潰暴露了與娛樂相關的加密貨幣的危險。正如 Satomi 對內部人士持有 40% 代幣供應量的警告所表明的那樣，內部控制和缺乏透明度使散戶投資者容易遭受損失。

As Squid Game Season 2 struggles to impress, the token’s collapse serves as a harsh reminder: Speculative crypto tied to pop culture often ends in losses for unsuspecting buyers.

當《Squid Game》第二季難以給人留下深刻印象時，該代幣的崩潰是一個嚴厲的提醒：與流行文化相關的投機加密貨幣往往會導致毫無戒心的買家蒙受損失。