Solana 在適度和審查制度的爭論中對抗攻擊性 Memecoin 激增

攻擊性迷因幣在 Solana 上激增，引發了人們對去中心化系統的節制和審查制度的擔憂。 Solana 基金會的 Austin Federa 建議 dApp 開發者阻止種族主義代幣，但 Aave Chan Initiative 的 Marc Zeller 認為審查制度應該發生在應用程式級別，讓底層網路不受許可。以太坊驗證器和中繼節點透過拒絕處理違反 OFAC 制裁的交易來展示集體審查做法，凸顯了區塊鏈審查的去中心化性質。

Solana Grapples with Surge in Offensive Memecoins, Sparking Debate on Moderation and Censorship

Solana 應對攻擊性迷因幣激增，引發有關節制和審查制度的爭論

The Solana ecosystem has witnessed an influx of offensive and hateful memecoins, raising concerns about moderation and the responsibilities of various ecosystem participants. The emergence of coins referencing racial slurs and antisemitic tropes has sparked a debate on the limits of censorship resistance and the role of different stakeholders in addressing this issue.

Solana 生態系統見證了攻擊性和仇恨性迷因幣的湧入，引發了人們對各種生態系統參與者的節制和責任的擔憂。涉及種族誹謗和反猶太主義比喻的硬幣的出現引發了一場關於抵制審查制度的局限性以及不同利益相關者在解決這一問題中的作用的辯論。

Offensive Memecoins Proliferate on Solana

攻擊性 Memecoin 在 Solana 上激增

While decentralization and censorship resistance are inherent features of blockchain technology, they also allow for the dissemination of potentially harmful content. On Solana, the proliferation of offensive memecoins has become a pressing concern, with coins such as Jewsdid911 gaining significant popularity and market capitalization.

雖然去中心化和抗審查性是區塊鏈技術的固有特徵，但它們也允許傳播潛在有害的內容。在 Solana 上，攻擊性 memecoin 的擴散已成為一個緊迫的問題，Jewishdid911 等代幣獲得了極大的受歡迎程度和市值。

Ecosystem Participants Consider Mitigation Strategies

生態系參與者考慮緩解策略

In response to the growing problem, ecosystem participants have engaged in discussions on how to address the issue effectively. During a recent meme coin panel discussion at BUIDL Asia in Seoul, Solana Foundation head of strategy Austin Federa suggested that wallet developers could implement filters to block offensive tokens, similar to the existing practice of filtering spam NFTs and tokens.

為了應對日益嚴重的問題，生態系統參與者就如何有效解決問題進行了討論。在最近在首爾 BUIDL Asia 舉行的 meme coin 小組討論中，Solana 基金會戰略主管 Austin Federa 建議錢包開發人員可以實施過濾器來阻止攻擊性代幣，類似於過濾垃圾郵件 NFT 和代幣的現有做法。

Federa emphasized the importance of moderation at the application level while advocating for the preservation of the underlying network's permissionless nature. He drew parallels to the lack of legal obligation for internet service providers (ISPs) to prevent the dissemination of racist content, suggesting that validators should not be expected to filter racist coins.

Federa 強調了應用程式層級審核的重要性，同時主張保留底層網路的無需許可的性質。他將網路服務供應商（ISP）缺乏防止種族主義內容傳播的法律義務進行了類比，建議驗證者不應過濾種族主義代幣。

However, critics of Federa's comparison highlighted the legal obligations imposed on ISPs in certain jurisdictions to block specific content. They argued that the libertarian ethos of the crypto space should not preclude the consideration of cultural differences and societal norms regarding freedom of expression.

然而，Federa 比較的批評者強調了某些司法管轄區中 ISP 必須承擔的阻止特定內容的法律義務。他們認為，加密貨幣空間的自由主義精神不應排除對文化差異和有關言論自由的社會規範的考量。

Validators' Role in Collective Censorship

驗證者在集體審查中的作用

While advocating for decentralized censorship resistance, Marc Zeller, founder of the Aave Chan Initiative, noted the practice of censorship by some Ethereum validators and relay nodes in compliance with Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) sanctions. Nearly half of Ethereum relay nodes and 64% of block-builders have been found to block transactions from OFAC-designated addresses.

Aave Chan Initiative 創辦人 Marc Zeller 在倡導抵制去中心化審查的同時，指出了一些以太坊驗證器和中繼節點根據外國資產控制辦公室 (OFAC) 制裁進行審查的做法。近一半的以太坊中繼節點和 64% 的區塊建構者被發現阻止來自 OFAC 指定地址的交易。

Zeller suggested that this action could be interpreted as a form of collective censorship, albeit less effective due to the decentralized nature of blockchains. By making it more difficult for offensive transactions to be included in new blocks, collective censorship can still have an impact.

澤勒表示，這項行動可以被解釋為集體審查的一種形式，儘管由於區塊鏈的去中心化性質而效果較差。透過使攻擊性交易更難包含在新區塊中，集體審查制度仍然可以產生影響。

Balancing Censorship with Decentralization

平衡審查與權力下放

The debate on moderation and censorship in the Solana ecosystem highlights the tension between the principles of free speech and the need to address harmful content. While censorship resistance is a fundamental tenet of blockchain technology, the proliferation of offensive memecoins raises questions about the responsibilities of different ecosystem participants in ensuring a responsible and inclusive environment.

關於 Solana 生態系統中的節制和審查制度的爭論凸顯了言論自由原則與解決有害內容的必要性之間的緊張關係。雖然抵制審查是區塊鏈技術的基本原則，但攻擊性迷因幣的擴散引發了人們對不同生態系統參與者在確保負責任和包容性環境方面的責任的質疑。

The ongoing discussions and exploration of potential mitigation strategies underscore the importance of finding a balance between protecting freedom of expression and preventing the spread of hate and discrimination. As the Solana ecosystem continues to evolve, it remains to be seen how stakeholders will navigate this complex challenge and shape the future of moderation and censorship on decentralized platforms.

正在進行的討論和對潛在緩解策略的探索強調了在保護言論自由與防止仇恨和歧視蔓延之間找到平衡的重要性。隨著 Solana 生態系統的不斷發展，利害關係人將如何應對這一複雜的挑戰並塑造去中心化平台上的節制和審查制度的未來，還有待觀察。