$HAWK 的興衰：Haliey Welch 有爭議的角色以及對加密貨幣空間的更廣泛影響

經常因其去中心化和創新而受到讚譽的加密貨幣世界，最近發現自己又陷入了另一個備受矚目的醜聞：$HAWK 代幣的崩潰。

The cryptocurrency world, often lauded for its decentralization and innovation, recently found itself reeling from yet another high-profile scandal: the collapse of the $HAWK token. Fronted by social media influencer Haliey Welch, known as the “Hawk Tuah Girl,” the $HAWK token promised riches but delivered financial ruin to over 33,000 investors. This report unpacks the rise and fall of $HAWK, Welch’s controversial role, and the broader implications for the crypto space.

經常因其去中心化和創新而受到讚譽的加密貨幣世界，最近發現自己又陷入了另一個備受矚目的醜聞：$HAWK 代幣的崩潰。在被稱為「Hawk Tuah Girl」的社群媒體影響者 Haliey Welch 的帶領下，$HAWK 代幣承諾帶來財富，但給超過 33,000 名投資者帶來了經濟損失。這份報告揭示了 $HAWK 的興衰、韋爾奇備受爭議的角色以及對加密貨幣領域更廣泛的影響。

The $HAWK token was launched amidst significant fanfare, leveraging Welch’s vast social media following. Promoted as a game-changing asset in the decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystem, the token experienced a meteoric rise in its initial days. Investors flocked to the project, lured by Welch’s endorsements and promises of high returns. However, the euphoria was short-lived.

$HAWK 代幣在大張旗鼓中推出，充分利用了 Welch 龐大的社群媒體粉絲。作為去中心化金融（DeFi）生態系統中改變遊戲規則的資產，該代幣在最初的日子裡經歷了快速上漲。受到韋爾奇的認可和高回報承諾的吸引，投資者紛紛湧入該項目。然而，這種興奮是短暫的。

Within weeks of its launch, the $HAWK token suffered a catastrophic “rug pull,” a scheme wherein project insiders abruptly sell their holdings, draining liquidity and crashing the token’s value. $HAWK lost over 95% of its value, rendering the token nearly worthless and leaving investors nursing significant losses. The financial devastation spread across 33,229 investors, marking one of the largest crypto scams in recent history.

在推出後的幾週內，$HAWK 代幣遭遇了災難性的“地毯拉動”，在該計劃中，項目內部人員突然出售其持有的資產，導致流動性耗盡並導致代幣價值暴跌。 $HAWK 損失了超過 95% 的價值，使該代幣幾乎一文不值，並讓投資者蒙受巨大損失。這次金融災難波及 33,229 名投資者，這是近代史上最大的加密貨幣騙局之一。

A rug pull exploits the liquidity pool of a token, which investors rely on to buy or sell their holdings. In the case of $HAWK, Welch and her team allegedly pre-mined a substantial portion of the token, holding reserves that were later sold at inflated prices. As liquidity evaporated, unsuspecting investors found themselves unable to sell their tokens. This classic rug pull maneuver underscores the need for caution in investing in projects with opaque tokenomics.

地毯拉動利用了代幣的流動性池，投資者依靠代幣來買賣其持有的資產。就 $HAWK 而言，韋爾奇和她的團隊據稱預先開採了該代幣的很大一部分，持有的儲備後來以高價出售。隨著流動性蒸發，毫無戒心的投資者發現自己無法出售他們的代幣。這種經典的地毯拉動策略強調了投資具有不透明代幣經濟的項目時需要謹慎。

Haliey Welch played a pivotal role in promoting $HAWK, leveraging her online persona to build trust and excitement. Welch’s background as an influencer, rather than a crypto expert, drew skepticism from some corners of the crypto community. However, her charisma and confident marketing appealed to novice investors.

Haliey Welch 在推廣 $HAWK 方面發揮了關鍵作用，利用她的線上形象建立信任和興奮。韋爾奇作為影響者而不是加密專家的背景引起了加密社區某些角落的懷疑。然而，她的魅力和自信的行銷吸引了新手投資者。

When the scam unraveled, Welch appeared in a live discussion but failed to assuage concerns. Her indifferent demeanor, coupled with a dismissive attitude, only intensified public outrage. While Welch denied any wrongdoing, her responses were widely viewed as tone-deaf. Adding to the mystery, Welch disappeared from public view shortly after the scandal broke, with her last known activity being a TikTok repost on December 18, 2024.

當騙局敗露後，韋爾奇出現在現場討論中，但未能緩解人們的擔憂。她冷漠的舉止，再加上不屑的態度，只會加劇大眾的憤怒。儘管韋爾奇否認有任何不當行為，但她的回應被廣泛視為充耳不聞。更神秘的是，醜聞爆發後不久，韋爾奇就從公眾視野中消失了，她最後一次已知的活動是 2024 年 12 月 18 日在 TikTok 上轉發。

The $HAWK scandal has ignited fury within the crypto community. Investors have launched a lawsuit targeting entities linked to the token, including Tuah The Moon Foundation and OverHere Ltd., but Welch herself remains conspicuously absent from the list of defendants. The lack of direct legal repercussions has fueled calls for greater accountability and justice.

$HAWK 醜聞激起了加密社群的憤怒。投資者已針對與該代幣相關的實體提起訴訟，包括 Tuah The Moon 基金會和 OverHere Ltd.，但韋爾奇本人仍明顯缺席被告名單。由於缺乏直接的法律影響，人們呼籲加強問責和伸張正義。

“People like Welch exploit the lack of regulation in crypto to prey on unsuspecting investors,”

“像韋爾奇這樣的人利用加密貨幣監管的缺乏來欺騙毫無戒心的投資者，”

said one affected investor.

一位受影響的投資者表示。

“We need stricter oversight to prevent this from happening again.”

“我們需要更嚴格的監督，以防止這種情況再次發生。”

Stephen “Coffeezilla” Findeisen, a prominent crypto investigator, played a critical role in exposing the fraudulent practices behind $HAWK. Through meticulous research, Coffeezilla revealed insider trading, token reservations for Welch’s team, and questionable promotional tactics.

Stephen “Coffeezilla” Findeisen 是一位著名的加密貨幣調查員，在揭露 $HAWK 背後的詐欺行為方面發揮了關鍵作用。透過細緻的研究，Coffeezilla 揭露了內幕交易、對韋爾奇團隊的代幣保留以及可疑的促銷策略。

“These are red flags every investor should be wary of,”

“這些是每個投資者都應該警惕的危險信號，”

Findeisen remarked.

芬德森說。

“Opaque tokenomics, lack of third-party audits, and heavy reliance on influencer marketing are classic signs of a potential scam.”

「不透明的代幣經濟學、缺乏第三方審計以及對影響者行銷的嚴重依賴是潛在騙局的典型跡象。”

Coffeezilla’s findings have become a rallying point for the crypto community, reinforcing the importance of due diligence and independent investigation.

Coffeezilla 的調查結果已成為加密貨幣社群的集結點，強調了盡職調查和獨立調查的重要性。

Welch’s public statements claim cooperation with legal teams and a commitment to “uncovering the truth.” However, critics argue that Welch’s framing of herself as a victim is a calculated attempt to shift blame. Meanwhile, regulatory bodies are under mounting pressure to impose stricter guidelines on cryptocurrency projects.

韋爾奇的公開聲明聲稱與法律團隊合作並承諾「揭露真相」。然而，批評者認為，韋爾奇將自己定位為受害者，是一種精心策劃的推卸責任的行為。同時，監管機構面臨越來越大的壓力，要求對加密貨幣專案實施更嚴格的指導方針。

The scandal has reignited debates on the need for comprehensive crypto regulations.

該醜聞重新引發了關於是否需要製定全面的加密貨幣監管的爭論。

“The $HAWK case shows how easily investors can be manipulated in an unregulated environment,”

“$HAWK 案表明，在不受監管的環境中，投資者是多麼容易被操縱。”

said a blockchain policy expert.

一位區塊鏈政策專家表示。

“We must balance innovation with safeguards to protect consumers.”

“我們必須平衡創新與保護消費者的保障措施。”

The HAWK fiasco has served as a cautionary tale to both investors and developers. Investors, on their part, were shown the importance of due diligence: looking into the project’s tokenomics, verifying team credentials, and keeping a safe distance from hype-driven projects. To developers, the incident was an ethical lesson in how to build projects transparently and sustainably.

HAWK的慘敗對投資者和開發商來說都是一個警示。就投資者而言，他們了解了盡職調查的重要性：調查項目的代幣經濟學，驗證團隊資格，並與炒作驅動的項目保持安全距離。對開發商來說，這起事件是關於如何透明和永續地建造專案的道德教訓。

The HAWK scandal is a clear example of DeFi’s double-edged nature: on the one hand, it fosters unparalleled innovation, while on the other, it provides fertile ground for exploitation. Only with stronger regulatory frameworks and community-driven oversight will such activities help restore trust for long-term growth as the industry matures.

HAWK 醜聞是 DeFi 雙刃性質的一個明顯例子：一方面，它促進了無與倫比的創新，而另一方面，它為剝削提供了肥沃的土壤。只有透過更強有力的監管框架和社區驅動的監督，隨著行業的成熟，此類活動才能幫助恢復對長期成長的信任。