Ripple 技術長 David Schwartz 對 Jed McCaleb 被排除在 SEC 訴訟之外發表評論

Ripple 技術長 David Schwartz 回答了為何 Ripple 聯合創辦人 Jed McCaleb 被排除在 SEC 訴訟之外的問題。

Ripple CTO David Schwartz has weighed in on the matter, addressing questions on why Ripple co-founder Jed McCaleb was notably absent from the SEC’s recent amended complaint. Schwartz suggested that McCaleb’s early departure from Ripple and his lack of ongoing involvement may have influenced the SEC’s decision.

Ripple 技術長 David Schwartz 對此事發表了看法，並回答了為什麼 Ripple 聯合創始人 Jed McCaleb 明顯缺席 SEC 最近修改後的投訴的問題。施瓦茨表示，麥卡萊布早期離開 Ripple 以及他缺乏持續參與可能影響了 SEC 的決定。

In a post on X, crypto commentator “Digital Asset Investor” raised questions on why McCaleb was not included in the SEC’s amended complaint. This inquiry followed a post by Andrew De Vilbis, who shared McCaleb’s vision for Stellar, the blockchain project that McCaleb co-founded after leaving Ripple.

在 X 上的一篇貼文中，加密貨幣評論員「數位資產投資者」提出了為什麼 McCaleb 沒有被納入 SEC 修改後的投訴中的問題。在調查之前，Andrew De Vilbis 發表了一篇文章，他分享了 McCaleb 對 Stellar 的願景，Stellar 是 McCaleb 在離開 Ripple 後共同創立的區塊鏈專案。

Responding to the commentary on McCaleb’s exclusion, Schwartz offered his perspective on the matter. He suggested that Ripple’s former CTO had not been included in the SEC’s amended complaint because his inclusion would not serve the agency’s objectives in the case. Schwartz stated:

在回應有關麥卡萊布被排除在外的評論時，施瓦茨提出了他對此事的看法。他表示，Ripple 的前首席技術長並未被納入 SEC 修改後的投訴中，因為將他納入其中不利於該機構在該案中的目標。施瓦茲表示：

You’d have to ask the SEC that. My speculation is that because he wasn’t currently holding any position at Ripple, including him in the suit wouldn’t provide any of the leverage that the SEC was looking for.

這個你得去問 SEC。我的猜測是，由於他目前沒有在 Ripple 擔任任何職位，因此將他納入訴訟不會提供 SEC 所尋求的任何槓桿作用。

This statement implies that the SEC may not have deemed McCaleb’s involvement critical to its case against Ripple’s current leadership, which includes CEO Brad Garlinghouse and Executive Chairman Chris Larsen.

這項聲明意味著 SEC 可能不認為 McCaleb 的參與對其針對 Ripple 現任領導層（包括執行長 Brad Garlinghouse 和執行主席 Chris Larsen）的案件至關重要。

As reported by Coin Edition earlier this month, the SEC has filed an appeal in the Ripple case, contesting the verdict that programmatic sales of XRP did not meet the legal criteria for an investment contract. In the filing, the agency also revived aiding and abetting claims against Garlinghouse and Larsen.

根據 Coin Edition 本月稍早報道，美國證券交易委員會 (SEC) 已就 Ripple 案提起上訴，對 XRP 程序化銷售不符合投資合約法律標準的判決提出質疑。在文件中，該機構還恢復了針對加林豪斯和拉森的協助和教唆指控。

According to legal expert Jeremy Hogan, this move appears aimed at increasing potential penalties, describing it as a calculated attempt to pressure Ripple’s executives.

法律專家 Jeremy Hogan 表示，此舉似乎旨在增加潛在的處罰，並將其描述為向 Ripple 高層施壓的精心策劃的嘗試。