Ripple CTO David Schwartz介紹了XRPL上的KYC執法和節點操作

隨著加密貨幣市場的大量價格下跌，Ripple CTO David Schwartz與Crypto記者Metaman在X（以前是Twitter）的討論中，以解決KYC執法對區塊鍊網絡中節點操作的影響，尤其是在XRP Ledger（ XRPL）內。

If crypto is known for anything, it’s its community. Members of the industry are often engaged in interesting discussion on the metaverse, and one topic that has been coming up a lot is KYC.

如果加密以任何事物而聞名，那就是它的社區。該行業的成員經常就Metaverse進行有趣的討論，而KYC的一個主題是很多話題。

As the crypto market continues to navigate substantial price drops, Ripple CTO David Schwartz joined a discussion with crypto journalist MetaMan on X (formerly Twitter) to address the effect of KYC enforcement on node operators in blockchain networks, especially within the XRP Ledger (XRPL).

隨著加密貨幣市場繼續導航大幅下跌，Ripple CTO David Schwartz加入了與加密新聞記者Metaman在X（以前是Twitter）上的討論，以解決KYC執法對區塊鍊網絡中的節點操作員的影響，尤其是在XRP Ledger（XRPL）內部（XRPL）內部的效果。 。

After MetaMan asked a fundamental question about "what does decentralization mean," Schwartz provided insights into the intricacies of blockchain governance and varied perspectives on this crucial aspect of Web3 technologies.

在Metaman問了一個關於“權力下放是什麼意思”的基本問題之後，Schwartz提供了對區塊鏈治理的重要性以及對Web3技術這一至關重要方面的各種觀點的見解。

The conversation began with MetaMan raising a key question regarding the implications of KYC mandates for node operators and the broader concept of decentralization.

對話始於Metaman提出了一個關鍵問題，該問題是關於KYC授權對節點運營商的含義以及更廣泛的權力下放概念的關鍵問題。

“If you have to KYC to run a Blockchain node, is that really decentralization?” asked MetaMan.

“如果您必須KYC運行一個區塊鏈節點，那真的是權力下放嗎？”梅曼問。

In response, Schwartz inquired about the nature of such a KYC mandate and how it would be enforced.

作為回應，施瓦茨詢問了這種KYC授權的性質以及如何執行它。

“Is it a legal license for the node software, which would be a huge amount of centralization, or would participants apply the rules in a decentralized way?”

“這是節點軟件的法定許可，這將是大量的集中化，還是參與者會以分散的方式應用規則？”

If it was a legal requirement due to licensing, then IMO that would be a huge amount of centralization. If the requirement was adopted and enforced in a decentralized way, then I'd have to look more closely at exactly what the requirements and implementation are.

如果這是由於許可而導致的法律要求，那麼IMO將是大量集中化。如果以分散的方式採用和執行了要求，那麼我必須更仔細地查看要求和實施是什麼。

Bitcoin SV vs. XRPL

比特幣SV與XRPL

Expanding on the topic of Bitcoin SV (BSV), Schwartz mentioned that "a specific organization" holds the legal claim over the software, thus dictating who can use it and ultimately join the network.

Schwartz在擴展比特幣SV（BSV）的主題時提到，“一個特定的組織”對該軟件持有法律上的主張，從而決定誰可以使用它並最終加入網絡。

However, Schwartz noted that XRPL node software is open-source and isn't owned by any single entity. This factor contributes to XRPL being more decentralized than BSV, as participants in the XRPL governance system can choose to fork the network if they disagree with the rules.

但是，Schwartz指出，XRPL節點軟件是開源的，並且不是任何一個實體都擁有的。這個因素有助於XRPL比BSV更加分散，因為XRPL治理系統的參與者如果不同意規則，可以選擇分叉網絡。

“It is not a new idea that safety is more important than progress when there is no way to pay for the damage caused by an error,” said Schwartz.

Schwartz說：“當無法支付錯誤造成的損害時，安全性比進度更重要，這並不是一個新想法。”

Those thoughts are especially relevant in cases where forward progress might be risky. For example, XRPL's consensus algorithm is designed to halt in such cases, and it's capable of remaining stalled for an indefinite period.

在前進進展可能有風險的情況下，這些想法尤其重要。例如，XRPL的共識算法旨在在這種情況下停止，並且能夠在不確定的時期內停滯不前。

This commitment to safety remains essential, given the large amounts of value that are transacted on XRPL.

考慮到XRPL上的大量價值，對安全性的承諾仍然至關重要。

Recently, eToro announced the addition of XRP to its U.S. offering via its partnership with Apex Clearing.

最近，Etoro通過與Apex Clearing的合作夥伴關係宣布將XRP添加到其美國產品中。