Ripple 抨擊 SEC 在 XRP 訴訟中的「沙袋」策略

Ripple Labs 是正在進行的 SEC 訴訟中的被告，已提出動議，要求刪除 SEC 的最新專家資料，認為這些資料的時間安排和性質違反了程序公平性。 Ripple 辯稱，助理總會計師 Andrea Fox 提交的資料是在商定的截止日期之後提交的，剝奪了他們正確盤問和反駁 Fox 會計分析的機會，Ripple 認為這些分析超出了單純資料匯總和分析的範圍。需要事先揭露的專家證詞。

Ripple Fires Back at SEC's Ambush Tactics: A Battle for Procedural Fairness and Crypto Regulation

Ripple 回擊 SEC 的伏擊策略：程序公平與加密貨幣監管之戰

In a decisive move, Ripple Labs Inc. has launched a scathing attack on the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), accusing the regulatory agency of employing unfair surprise tactics in their ongoing legal battle over the sale of XRP. At the heart of Ripple's challenge lies the timing and deceptive nature of the SEC's expert witness submission, a move that Ripple alleges could irreversibly sway the outcome of the case.

Ripple Labs Inc. 採取了果斷行動，對美國證券交易委員會 (SEC) 發起嚴厲攻擊，指責該監管機構在針對 XRP 銷售的持續法律戰中採用了不公平的突擊策略。 Ripple 挑戰的核心在於 SEC 提交專家證人的時機和欺騙性，Ripple 聲稱此舉可能會不可逆轉地影響案件的結果。

Untimely and Prejudicial: The Contested Timing of the SEC's Submission

不合時宜且有偏見：美國證券交易委員會提交文件的有爭議的時機

Ripple's legal team vehemently contends that the SEC's introduction of expert materials prepared by Andrea Fox, an Assistant Chief Accountant in the SEC's Division of Enforcement, came well after the agreed-upon remedies discovery deadline. This eleventh-hour submission, Ripple argues, constitutes a blatant violation of procedural fairness and ethical legal conduct.

Ripple 的法律團隊強烈主張，SEC 引入由 SEC 執法部門助理總會計師 Andrea Fox 準備的專家資料，是在商定的補救措施發現截止日期之後很久才提供的。瑞波認為，這份在最後一刻提交的文件構成了對程序公平性和道德法律行為的公然違反。

Fox's expert declaration, bolstered by intricate accounting analyses, endeavors to quantify the alleged net profits that Ripple accrued from the sale of XRP. However, Ripple maintains that Fox's involvement extends far beyond mere data summarization, delving into the realm of substantive accounting judgments that should have been disclosed at an earlier stage as an expert witness.

福克斯的專家聲明在複雜的會計分析的支持下，努力量化 Ripple 從銷售 XRP 中獲得的所謂淨利潤。然而，Ripple 堅持認為，福克斯的參與遠遠超出了單純的數據匯總，深入研究了本應作為專家證人在早期階段披露的實質會計判斷領域。

Sandbagging and the Erosion of Procedural Fairness

沙袋和程序公平性的侵蝕

Ripple's attorneys vigorously assert that the SEC's belated submission amounts to "sandbagging," a pejorative term used to describe underhanded tactics in legal proceedings where one party blindsides the other with unexpected evidence or information. Citing established legal precedent, Ripple emphasizes the fundamental need to prevent such procedural disadvantages, as outlined in Rule 37(c)(1).

Ripple 的律師極力聲稱，美國證券交易委員會遲來的提交相當於“沙袋”，這是一個貶義詞，用於描述法律訴訟中的不正當手段，其中一方用意想不到的證據或信息讓另一方措手不及。 Ripple 引用既定的法律先例，強調了防止此類程序缺陷的根本必要性，如規則 37(c)(1) 所述。

In contrast, the SEC maintains that Fox should not be classified as an expert witness but rather as a "summary witness." This distinction carries significant weight, as it determines the timing and scope of disclosure required under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a).

相較之下，美國證券交易委員會認為福斯不應被歸類為專家證人，而應被歸類為「簡易證人」。這種區別具有重要意義，因為它決定了聯邦民事訴訟規則 26(a) 所要求的揭露時間和範圍。

Expert Witness or Summary Witness: Unmasking Fox's True Role

專家證人或總結證人：揭露福克斯的真實角色

Ripple counters this argument, asserting that Fox's comprehensive examination of financial records and application of specialized accounting principles unequivocally place her in the category of an expert witness. This designation, Ripple argues, warranted earlier disclosure, providing Ripple's legal team ample opportunity for thorough cross-examination and rebuttal.

里普爾反駁了這一論點，聲稱福克斯對財務記錄的全面檢查和專業會計原則的應用明確地將她歸類為了專家證人的範疇。 Ripple 認為，這項指定有必要事先揭露，為 Ripple 的法律團隊提供了充分的機會進行徹底的盤問和反駁。

The late submission, Ripple contends, deprived them of this essential process, potentially prejudicing their defense and undermining the integrity of the legal process. By introducing Fox's expert declaration at such a late stage, Ripple alleges that the SEC has sought to gain an unfair advantage, skewing the playing field in their favor.

Ripple 認為，遲到的提交剝奪了他們這一重要程序的權利，可能會損害他們的辯護並破壞法律程序的完整性。 Ripple 聲稱，透過在如此晚的階段引入福克斯的專家聲明，SEC 試圖獲得不公平的優勢，使競爭環境向有利於他們的方向傾斜。

Implications for Ripple's Defense and Crypto Regulation

對瑞波幣防禦和加密貨幣監管的影響

Ripple's legal team maintains that the SEC's untimely submission has far-reaching implications that transcend procedural fairness. They argue that it could potentially prejudice their ability to present a robust defense, eroding the integrity of the judicial process. By requesting the striking of the late disclosure, Ripple seeks to level the playing field and ensure a fair and impartial trial.

Ripple 的法律團隊認為，SEC 的不及時提交具有超越程序公平性的深遠影響。他們認為，這可能會損害他們提出強有力辯護的能力，損害司法程序的公正性。透過要求停止遲到的披露，Ripple 尋求公平競爭並確保公平公正的審判。

The outcome of this case carries significant weight not only for Ripple but also for the entire cryptocurrency industry. A verdict against Ripple could set a dangerous precedent, strengthening the SEC's regulatory authority over digital assets and stifling innovation in the blockchain space. Conversely, a victory for Ripple could provide much-needed clarity in the regulatory landscape surrounding cryptocurrencies, fostering growth and development in the industry.

此案的結果不僅對瑞波幣而且對整個加密貨幣產業都具有重大意義。針對 Ripple 的判決可能會開創一個危險的先例，加強 SEC 對數位資產的監管權力，並扼殺區塊鏈領域的創新。相反，Ripple 的勝利可能會為加密貨幣的監管環境帶來急需的清晰度，從而促進該行業的成長和發展。

A Legal Saga with Far-Reaching Consequences

具有深遠影響的法律傳奇

As the Ripple vs. SEC saga unfolds, the legal maneuvering and strategic jockeying have captivated the attention of investors and industry stakeholders alike. With billions of dollars at stake and the future of cryptocurrency regulation hanging in the balance, the outcome of this case will undoubtedly have a profound impact on the industry's evolution.

隨著 Ripple 與 SEC 事件的展開，法律操作和策略博弈吸引了投資者和行業利益相關者的注意。由於涉及數十億美元以及加密貨幣監管的未來懸而未決，此案的結果無疑將對行業的演變產生深遠的影響。

In the constantly evolving realm of crypto regulation, the Ripple vs. SEC case presents a pivotal moment, testing the boundaries between innovation and oversight. As observers eagerly await the next chapter in this legal saga, one thing remains certain: the ripple effects of this courtroom battle will be felt throughout the cryptocurrency ecosystem and beyond.

在不斷發展的加密貨幣監管領域，Ripple 與 SEC 案件呈現出一個關鍵時刻，考驗著創新與監管之間的界線。當觀察家們熱切地等待這一法律傳奇的下一章時，有一件事仍然是確定的：這場法庭之爭的連鎖反應將波及整個加密貨幣生態系統及其他地區。