Ripple 抨击 SEC 在 XRP 诉讼中的“沙袋”策略

Ripple Labs 是正在进行的 SEC 诉讼中的被告，已提出动议，要求删除 SEC 的最新专家材料，认为这些材料的时间安排和性质违反了程序公平性。 Ripple 辩称，助理总会计师 Andrea Fox 提交的材料是在商定的截止日期之后提交的，剥夺了他们正确盘问和反驳 Fox 会计分析的机会，Ripple 认为这些分析超出了单纯数据汇总和分析的范围。构成需要提前披露的专家证词。

Ripple Fires Back at SEC's Ambush Tactics: A Battle for Procedural Fairness and Crypto Regulation

Ripple 回击 SEC 的伏击策略：程序公平和加密货币监管之战

In a decisive move, Ripple Labs Inc. has launched a scathing attack on the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), accusing the regulatory agency of employing unfair surprise tactics in their ongoing legal battle over the sale of XRP. At the heart of Ripple's challenge lies the timing and deceptive nature of the SEC's expert witness submission, a move that Ripple alleges could irreversibly sway the outcome of the case.

Ripple Labs Inc. 采取了果断行动，对美国证券交易委员会 (SEC) 发起严厉攻击，指责该监管机构在针对 XRP 销售的持续法律战中采用了不公平的突击策略。 Ripple 挑战的核心在于 SEC 提交专家证人的时机和欺骗性，Ripple 声称此举可能会不可逆转地影响案件的结果。

Untimely and Prejudicial: The Contested Timing of the SEC's Submission

不合时宜且有偏见：美国证券交易委员会提交文件的有争议的时机

Ripple's legal team vehemently contends that the SEC's introduction of expert materials prepared by Andrea Fox, an Assistant Chief Accountant in the SEC's Division of Enforcement, came well after the agreed-upon remedies discovery deadline. This eleventh-hour submission, Ripple argues, constitutes a blatant violation of procedural fairness and ethical legal conduct.

Ripple 的法律团队强烈主张，SEC 引入由 SEC 执法部门助理总会计师 Andrea Fox 准备的专家材料，是在商定的补救措施发现截止日期之后很久才提供的。瑞波认为，这份在最后一刻提交的文件构成了对程序公平性和道德法律行为的公然违反。

Fox's expert declaration, bolstered by intricate accounting analyses, endeavors to quantify the alleged net profits that Ripple accrued from the sale of XRP. However, Ripple maintains that Fox's involvement extends far beyond mere data summarization, delving into the realm of substantive accounting judgments that should have been disclosed at an earlier stage as an expert witness.

福克斯的专家声明在复杂的会计分析的支持下，努力量化 Ripple 从销售 XRP 中获得的所谓净利润。然而，Ripple 坚持认为，福克斯的参与远远超出了单纯的数据汇总，深入研究了本应作为专家证人在早期阶段披露的实质性会计判断领域。

Sandbagging and the Erosion of Procedural Fairness

沙袋和程序公平性的侵蚀

Ripple's attorneys vigorously assert that the SEC's belated submission amounts to "sandbagging," a pejorative term used to describe underhanded tactics in legal proceedings where one party blindsides the other with unexpected evidence or information. Citing established legal precedent, Ripple emphasizes the fundamental need to prevent such procedural disadvantages, as outlined in Rule 37(c)(1).

Ripple 的律师极力声称，美国证券交易委员会迟来的提交相当于“沙袋”，这是一个贬义词，用于描述法律诉讼中的不正当手段，其中一方用意想不到的证据或信息让另一方措手不及。 Ripple 援引既定的法律先例，强调了防止此类程序缺陷的根本必要性，如规则 37(c)(1) 中所述。

In contrast, the SEC maintains that Fox should not be classified as an expert witness but rather as a "summary witness." This distinction carries significant weight, as it determines the timing and scope of disclosure required under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a).

相比之下，美国证券交易委员会认为福克斯不应被归类为专家证人，而应被归类为“简易证人”。这种区别具有重要意义，因为它决定了联邦民事诉讼规则 26(a) 所要求的披露时间和范围。

Expert Witness or Summary Witness: Unmasking Fox's True Role

专家证人或总结证人：揭露福克斯的真实角色

Ripple counters this argument, asserting that Fox's comprehensive examination of financial records and application of specialized accounting principles unequivocally place her in the category of an expert witness. This designation, Ripple argues, warranted earlier disclosure, providing Ripple's legal team ample opportunity for thorough cross-examination and rebuttal.

里普尔反驳了这一论点，声称福克斯对财务记录的全面检查和专业会计原则的应用明确地将她归入了专家证人的范畴。 Ripple 认为，这一指定有必要提前披露，为 Ripple 的法律团队提供了充分的机会进行彻底的盘问和反驳。

The late submission, Ripple contends, deprived them of this essential process, potentially prejudicing their defense and undermining the integrity of the legal process. By introducing Fox's expert declaration at such a late stage, Ripple alleges that the SEC has sought to gain an unfair advantage, skewing the playing field in their favor.

Ripple 认为，迟到的提交剥夺了他们这一重要程序的权利，可能会损害他们的辩护并破坏法律程序的完整性。 Ripple 声称，通过在如此晚的阶段引入福克斯的专家声明，SEC 试图获得不公平的优势，使竞争环境向有利于他们的方向倾斜。

Implications for Ripple's Defense and Crypto Regulation

对瑞波币防御和加密货币监管的影响

Ripple's legal team maintains that the SEC's untimely submission has far-reaching implications that transcend procedural fairness. They argue that it could potentially prejudice their ability to present a robust defense, eroding the integrity of the judicial process. By requesting the striking of the late disclosure, Ripple seeks to level the playing field and ensure a fair and impartial trial.

Ripple 的法律团队认为，SEC 的不及时提交具有超越程序公平性的深远影响。他们认为，这可能会损害他们提出强有力辩护的能力，损害司法程序的公正性。通过要求停止迟到的披露，Ripple 寻求公平竞争并确保公平公正的审判。

The outcome of this case carries significant weight not only for Ripple but also for the entire cryptocurrency industry. A verdict against Ripple could set a dangerous precedent, strengthening the SEC's regulatory authority over digital assets and stifling innovation in the blockchain space. Conversely, a victory for Ripple could provide much-needed clarity in the regulatory landscape surrounding cryptocurrencies, fostering growth and development in the industry.

此案的结果不仅对瑞波币而且对整个加密货币行业都具有重大意义。针对 Ripple 的判决可能会开创一个危险的先例，加强 SEC 对数字资产的监管权力，并扼杀区块链领域的创新。相反，Ripple 的胜利可能会为加密货币的监管环境带来急需的清晰度，从而促进该行业的增长和发展。

A Legal Saga with Far-Reaching Consequences

具有深远影响的法律传奇

As the Ripple vs. SEC saga unfolds, the legal maneuvering and strategic jockeying have captivated the attention of investors and industry stakeholders alike. With billions of dollars at stake and the future of cryptocurrency regulation hanging in the balance, the outcome of this case will undoubtedly have a profound impact on the industry's evolution.

随着 Ripple 与 SEC 事件的展开，法律操作和战略博弈吸引了投资者和行业利益相关者的关注。由于涉及数十亿美元以及加密货币监管的未来悬而未决，此案的结果无疑将对行业的演变产生深远的影响。

In the constantly evolving realm of crypto regulation, the Ripple vs. SEC case presents a pivotal moment, testing the boundaries between innovation and oversight. As observers eagerly await the next chapter in this legal saga, one thing remains certain: the ripple effects of this courtroom battle will be felt throughout the cryptocurrency ecosystem and beyond.

在不断发展的加密货币监管领域，Ripple 与 SEC 案件呈现出一个关键时刻，考验着创新与监管之间的界限。当观察家们热切地等待这一法律传奇的下一章时，有一件事仍然是确定的：这场法庭之争的连锁反应将波及整个加密货币生态系统及其他地区。