在 Prometheum Ether 調查中，SEC 面臨澄清加密貨幣託管立場的壓力

眾議院金融服務和農業委員會已致函 SEC 主席 Gary Gensler，要求澄清 SEC 對 Prometheum 計劃提供以太坊 (ETH) 託管服務的立場。這項請求源於對 SEC 和商品期貨交易委員會 (CFTC) 在 ETH 分類方面潛在監管差異的擔憂。

Is the SEC Ready for Crypto Custody?

SEC 準備好進行加密貨幣託管了嗎？

The House Financial Services Committee and House Agriculture Committee have penned a letter to Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Chairman Gary Gensler, seeking clarity on the agency's stance towards Prometheum's plans to offer custody services for Ether (ETH).

眾議院金融服務委員會和眾議院農業委員會已致函美國證券交易委員會 (SEC) 主席加里·詹斯勒 (Gary Gensler)，要求澄清該機構對 Prometheum 提供以太坊 (ETH) 託管服務計劃的立場。

The Ether Classification Conundrum

以太分類難題

The debate stems from Prometheum's announcement to provide custody services for ETH, raising questions about the asset's regulatory classification. The lawmakers' letter highlights the potential confusion between the SEC, which may view ETH as a security, and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), which treats it as a commodity.

這場爭論源於 Prometheum 宣佈為 ETH 提供託管服務，引發了對該資產監管分類的質疑。立法者的信件強調了美國證券交易委員會（SEC）和商品期貨交易委員會（CFTC）之間可能存在的混淆，美國證券交易委員會可能將ETH 視為一種證券，而商品期貨交易委員會（CFTC）則將其視為一種商品。

SEC vs. CFTC: A Regulatory Divide

SEC 與 CFTC：監管分歧

The SEC has hinted at classifying ETH as a security, a significant factor in approving spot Ether Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) and other ETH-related investment products. Conversely, the CFTC has consistently classified cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ether as commodities, asserting its authority over these digital assets. This divergence in perspectives has left Ether's classification uncertain.

美國證券交易委員會暗示將 ETH 歸類為證券，這是批准現貨以太幣交易所交易基金 (ETF) 和其他與 ETH 相關的投資產品的一個重要因素。相反，美國商品期貨交易委員會一直將比特幣和以太幣等加密貨幣歸類為商品，以維護其對這些數位資產的權威。這種觀點的分歧使得以太幣的分類變得不確定。

Lawmakers Demand Clarity

立法者要求明確

The lawmakers' letter emphasizes the importance of the SEC's impending decision, warning that the lack of clear guidance could "irreparably harm" digital asset markets. They seek clarification on whether special purpose broker-dealers (SPBDs) like Prometheum can hold non-security digital assets and the regulatory implications of such actions.

議員們的信件強調了美國證券交易委員會即將做出的決定的重要性，並警告稱，缺乏明確的指導可能會「不可挽回地損害」數位資產市場。他們尋求澄清 Prometheum 等特殊目的經紀交易商 (SPBD) 是否可以持有非證券數位資產以及此類行為的監管影響。

Beyond Prometheum: A General Need for Consistency

超越 Prometheum：對一致性的普遍需求

The SEC's request for clarity extends beyond Prometheum's case, highlighting the need for consistent and transparent regulatory frameworks for all digital assets. The uncertainty surrounding Ether's classification demonstrates the pressing need for a coherent policy that reflects the evolving digital asset landscape.

SEC 的澄清要求超出了 Prometheum 的案例，強調了所有數位資產需要一致且透明的監管框架。圍繞以太坊分類的不確定性表明，迫切需要製定反映不斷變化的數位資產格局的連貫政策。

Market Participants Call for Guidance

市場參與者呼籲指導

The House Committees' letter echoes a growing sentiment among market participants and regulators for practical and implementable guidance that can foster the development and innovation of digital asset markets. The SEC's response will be closely watched, as it has the potential to shape the regulatory framework for this burgeoning industry.

眾議院委員會的信件反映了市場參與者和監管機構對能夠促進數位資產市場發展和創新的實用且可實施的指導意見日益增長的情緒。美國證券交易委員會的反應將受到密切關注，因為它有可能為這個新興產業塑造監管框架。

Read Also:

另請閱讀：

• CFTC Classifies Ethereum and Litecoin as Commodities in KuCoin Case

CFTC 在庫幣案例中將以太坊和萊特幣歸類為商品